How much money is HDB making or losing from the sale of new flats?
From our Correspondent
The rising disgruntlement on the ground over exorbitantly priced HDB flats had to another round of “damage control” by the HDB through the state-controlled media.
Days after days, HDB officers wrote to the Straits Times Forum explaining painstakingly why HDB flats are still affordable and how the prices are being computed.
After yet another merry-go-round, we are none the wiser about HDB’s pricing policies and strategies as the key question on the minds of many Singaporeans remained unanswered – how much profit is HDB making out of the sale of new flats?
Finance Consultant Mr Leong Sze Hian made a crude estimate based on available figures:
“Since there will be 864 HDB flats, the average cost per flat, inclusive of communal amenities, site works and contingency works, is about $120,602 ($104.2 million divided by 864 flats).
With the latest HDB new 4-room flats at Punggol (Punggol Residences BTO) selling at an average price of $293,000 (price range of $264,000 to $322,000 divided by 2), does it mean that the HDB stands to make a profit of about $172,398 per flat, or a profit margin of about 143 per cent?”
[Source: Hardwarezone]
Is HDB making a profit of more than 100 per cent from Singaporeans for each new flat the sold?
The reluctance of HDB to come clean with the public will only fuel undesired rampant speculations on the ground.
HDB should reveal the following figures to Singaporeans and let them judge for themselves if HDB flats are affordable instead of repeating the same mantra without substantiating them:
1. What is the land cost, construction cost and miscellaneous cost of each unit of flat built?
2. How much does it cost HDB to build one unit of flat?
As HDB is a government agency, it should be accountable and transparent to the public by revealing the above figures on its website or annual report for otherwise Singaporeans will not be in a position to understand its pricing mechanisms.
HDB flats are supposed to be low-cost public housing easily affordable to the masses. Is it morally correct for HDB to make a profit out of it? If HDB thinks so, then it should at least have the basic courtesy to explain to the buyers why they should be over-paying for HDB flats when they are supposed to be entitlements to them as citizens of Singapore.
Furthermore, it has to account to the public where the excess profits are going to. Are Singaporeans indirectly helping to finance the government’s risky investments overseas? To withold the truth from Singaporeans is tantamount to deceiving them.
In the past when the prices are pegged to the construction costs, the flats are easily affordable and the price fluctuations minimal.
By pegging the prices of new flats to that of resale flats in the vicinity, the prices have rise astronomically over the last few years. While they may still remain affordable by HDB standards, they are no longer “easily” affordable.
The onus is on the National Development Minister to come clean with the public instead of hiding his head in the sand like an ostrich with the usual exhortations that HDB flats are affordable when they are obviously not.
Buying a flat is an expensive investment which entails a buyer to commit part of his/her monthly salaries to finance the mortage loan for the rest of his/her life.
At today’s prices, will Singaporeans still have sufficient savings in their CPF to retire comfortably in old age or do they have to work till they drop head to pay for a roof over their heads?
Home ownership accounts for nothing if Singaporeans are plunged into deeper and deeper debts just to pay for public housing.
In the first place, the government should not be involved in building public housing in the first place.
HDB has obviously outlived its usefulness as an agency to provide cheap and affordable housing for the people. Its current position will be untenable if it turns out to be true, as many Singaporeans suspect, that it is profiteering from the sale of new flats.
The government should open the public housing sector to private property developers with HDB being an overall regulatory authority instead. Allowing a few competitors in the market is the surest way of bringing down the prices and give Singaporeans more choices to choose from.
Related articles:
>> Drawbacks of using STIR as a bench mark to assess housing affordability
>> Part 1: Singaporeans do not own their HDB flats
>> Part 2: HDB flats are unaffordable to most Singaporeans
>> Part 3: Rising prices of HDB flats does not create wealth
EDITORS’ NOTE:
If you like our work and would like to support us, please transfer your donations via paypal to our account ([email protected]). Any amount will be greatly appreciated! Alternatively, you can also help boost our advertising revenue by clicking on the ads displayed. Thank you!
Join our tweet at: http://www.twitter.com/temasekreview and facebook at www.facebook.com (search for “Temasek Review”)





















Since SLA and HDB are essentially the state, apart from the cost of the public infrastructure linking the housing estate, land cost can be regarded as zero.
Construction cost is approximately S$100-150 psf of sellable area.
The rest is pure profit.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Sorry guys, don’t talk about the past any more.
TH lost billions and all other govt agencies will need to squeeze you people to pump more fund into them.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
HDB, like what NTUC was start up to control price to ensure goods and housing pricing are kept low, regulate inflation.
Now NTUC is completing with businesses and many areas, going after the same market as many businesses. HBD, on the other hand, instead of keeping housing price low, now tagged selling price of new flats to market rate, shouldn’t they be keeping selling price of new flats low such that resale market price will not balloon?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I find that the calculation by Mr Leong Sze Hian, whilst crude as it excludes the opportunity cost of land, is valid.
The present calculation by HDB implies it’s dependence on fixing new home prices on the “market price” of existing resale homes. Sadly, this resale home price is not created by natural market forces but artificial ones – which are created by themselves in by building lesser and using BTO schemes.
Insufficient supply + crazy demand from PRs fueled the hyperinflation of HDB prices. So how can HDB base the pricing of new flats on inflated prices that they created in the first place!
The fact is a taxi driver with a factory-working used to be able to afford a 3-room HDB comfortably. What can a taxi driver buy today?
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Is HDB making a profit of more than 100 per cent from Singaporeans for each new flat the sold?
Sorry, still got mortgages interests.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
尔俸尔禄,民脂民膏,下民易虐,上天难欺
Like or Dislike:
0
0
HDB said they are providing subsidised housing, if that is the case why the need to tag to market rate since they are subsidised flats?
Shouldn’t HDB be selling flats based on building cost with subsidised rate? Having a markup of over 100% and “subsidising” 30% is not subsidising at all.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
It is shocking that HDB is using taxpayers money to make exorbitant profit out of us through our CPF Funds and bankrupt the citizens permanently which explains why Annual life income is forced on the citizenry. The profits are than splurged by the Jinx who almost bankrupt the coffer of our nation and now she wants retalier to chip in the funding for her to spend further. These are all very gross of the govt unpopular behaviour and they wanted us to swallowed the bitterness whole with warped logic!!!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Well simple, HDB makes profit. It is a fact.
It could argue that there is no profit to be made or blah this or blah that in comparision to using the land for commercial purposes……
With the introduction of PR being able to own HDB flats.
Singapore HDB flats no longer is a flat for singaporeans only.
Singapore for singaporeans is no longer an ideal promoted.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I don’t think the HDB will ever reveal the actual land cost used in the computation…
If they did, we may find that they are selling us ulu land at Orchard Road prices…
And if we can’t calculate from bottom up, we can try doing it from top down – since HDB claims they don’t make any money, any leftover amount after deducting the construction cost and other amendities costs from the sale price must be land cost…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Had a brainwave. I am not sure if any of the following could be true?
Conspiracy theory #1 : HDB builds flats for a profit – control supply, control price and control who is eligible to buy, equates prices always higher than cost. Profit goes to GIC and Temasek for investment?
Conspiracy theory #2 : HDB flat prices are high as part of national policy to ensure citizens are perpetually asset-rich and cash-poor?
So that most citizens do not have ready means to “abandon ship” and migrate.
By the time you pay off mortgage (30 years), the citizen would be 1) too old to migrate, 2) have little savings and 3) reverse-mortgaged flat back to HDB and maybe 4) solely dependent on CPF to survive.
side-note: Actually, according to Rich Dad, Poor Dad, HDB flat is not an asset. CSince you cannot generate income from it and continue to pay for it. If rentals were cheaper, I suspect many will not even consider buying.
Lifeislikethis
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@Lifeislikethis on Wed, 23rd Sep 2009 3:56 pm :
I believe actual reality = consiracy theories 1 + 2 + 3 combined.
This means that we are sinking very deep. hope it will be a quick death, but it doesn’t look like we’ll be getting off that easy.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
The Total Breakeven Cost of a new flat comprise Construction Cost (CC), Land Cost (LC) and Other Related Cost (ORC).
The HDB Pinnacle @ Duxton project has 1,848 units cramped into 50-storey blocks occupying a small plot of land.
From available public tender information, the actual CC component is $150,000 per unit. The onus is now on HDB to publicly disclose the remaining LC and ORC components.
A quick estimate of LC plus ORC is around $80,000, leading to an estimated Total Breakeven Cost of $230,000 per flat.
When launched in 2004, average Selling Price was $370,000 (actual range: $288,000 to $450,000), which translates to an average profit of $140,000 per unit sold.
428 unsold units were relaunched in 2008 at average Selling Price of $550,000 (actual range: $450,000 to $645,000), which is $180,000 higher than initial launch prices. This arose from the HDB “market-based” pricing approach, as prevailing market prices of similar resale flats nearby were between $593,000 to $670,000.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
How come HDB needs to lease the land from Sing land?
How come the price at which the Sing land leases to HDB is at a pre-determined price?
If HDB wants its books to look good, just reduce the price at which singland leases the land to hdb.
That price is not bidded? how come?
Your answer is as good as mine.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
HDB is monopolizing, they won’t bend, i can bet on it.
stop buying, and start renting
Like or Dislike:
0
0