Public housing affordability: HDB versus Singaporeans

By Khalil Adis, Social Correspondent

[Khalil Adis a former editor of Property Report. He now writes for Property Report, Property Guru and Temasek Review]

The rising number of cash rich immigrants to Singapore is pricing out first time Singaporean homeowners from the HDB resale market. Meanwhile, the HDB has been slow to react in releasing new supply in the market.

Can the average Singaporean really afford public housing in Singapore? Has the Housing Development Board (HDB) lost sight of its purpose? A recent news report that the cash-over-valuation (COV) for a three-room HDB flat in Toa Payoh which was transacted for a record S$70, 000, has had Singapore’s online community debating just that, with some concluding that HDB flats have indeed become far too expensive for the first time home buyers.

Although figures on the median COVs on the resale market for the third quarter of 2009 are not yet available on HDB’s website, this $70, 000 COV is the highest so far (for a three-room flat) since the HDB started tracking median COVs in the resale market since the second quarter of 2007.

However, that is just the tip of the iceberg. Property analysts are expecting COVs for the rest of 2009 to continue increasing due to strong demand and a lack of supply.

“Increasing cash-over-valuation is a reflection of greater demand than supply. The recovering economy and the fact that private properties are also on the rise, has resulted in this greater demand,” says PropNex chief executive officer, Mohamed Ismail.

The rising COVs are a cause of concern among Singaporeans, especially since the prices for HDB resale prices are now at a new peak.

Data from real estate firm PropNex shows that the HDB’s resale price index (RPI) for the second quarter of 2009 has climbed by 1.4 percent to an all-time high of 140.2 points.

Compared to the first quarter of 2007, the index has now risen by 35.3 percent.

The HDB’s flash estimate for the Resale Price Index (RPI) for the third quarter of this year confirmed Mohamed Ismail’s prediction.

It is now at 144.7 percent and an increase of 3.2 percent from the previous quarter – the highest level of the index since its conception in 1998. Mohamed Ismail now expects the RPI to rise by 4–5 points over the next two quarters to reach about 145 by the year’s end.

So on top of a record in resale prices, Singaporeans now have to deal with rising COV which has to be paid upfront in cash. According to recent reports, COVs for three and four-room HDB flats have doubled over the last two months averaging more than $20, 000.

 

Causes of rising COVs

According to government data, Singapore’s population has grown to almost 5 million. Of this, approximately a quarter of that is foreign workers. The number of foreigners getting permanent residency status also surged more than 11 percent in 2009.

It is no rocket science that the reasons COVs are rising are due partly to the influx of foreigners to our shores. PropNex notes that permanent residents in Singapore were taking advantage of the initially low COV to buy flats which has now escalated.

In fact, property agents acting on behalf of permanent residents have been busy dropping flyers in the heartlands promising high COVs. Even in far-flung areas like Jurong West, COVs are between $20, 000 to $35, 000.

Whilst foreigners and permanent residents are eligible to buy private properties, the HDB resale market is only open to permanent residents and Singaporeans.

Data from real estate firm ERA shows that about 40 percent of the buyers in the resale market are permanent residents.

The increase in demand for HDB resale flats versus the lack of supply is also helping to fuel the high COVs with the highest bidder having a distinct advantage.

Usually when the COV is higher, first time homebuyers would look instead to Build to Order (BTO) and Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS) projects. However, buyers will have to wait three to four years before they can move in.

For the cash strapped singles or young couples who cannot wait for three years for a new flat, they will have no choice but to defer their purchase, resulting in deferred marriage for couples. Could this perhaps explain the nation’s low fertility rate?

Otherwise, as Minister for National Development Mah Bow Tan had advised, their other option is to look for HDB flats that offer no COVs in far-flung areas like Woodlands.

But how realistic is this?

 

Case study one: Singles buying from the resale market

Dean Shams, a first time homebuyer, recently found out that it wasn’t as easy as Minister Mah had suggested.

The 37-year-old publicist started house hunting early this year. As he is a bachelor, Shams is only eligible to buy resale flats from the HDB. He looked at four resale three-room flats in the Bedok area. Being a mature estate, all the prospective sellers were asking for COVs.

In July, Shams was lucky enough to land his dream home for $221, 000 just at a time when the resale price index was on its record rise.

The seller had initially asked for $9, 000 but agreed to lower it to $3, 000 as they were desperate to offload their property as they were no longer able to afford their monthly mortgage.

The trade off, however, is a run down flat in which Shams had to spend a further $20, 000 on for a basic renovation. The total upfront cost came up to $23, 000.

In another scenario, Bob Boon, a 36-year-old human resource officer in a bank, bought his three-room flat in Serangoon for $255, 000 with a COV of $25, 000. On top of taking a housing loan, Boon also had to take a bank loan to cover the COV as well as a $30,000 renovation loan.

Despite the hefty loan amounting to $55,000, Boon says a resale HDB flat is still affordable by his standards.

 

Case study 2: Young couples buying from the resale and/or direct from HDB

Luqman Hakim Abdul Khir and his wife have been trying to get a flat this year. Being a sole breadwinner with a gross salary of $1, 488, he is eligible for an HDB loan of $120, 300 with $482 in monthly installments.

He has two options: Buying from a resale market or buying direct from the HDB via a balloting system.

 

Option 1: Buying from a resale market.

As Minister Mah had suggested, Abdul Khir had looked at over 30 three-room flats in Woodlands, Sembawang, Yishun, Ang Mo Kio, Toa Payoh, Hougang, Serangoon, Ubi and Bukit Batok. He could not afford option one as agents were asking for $2, 000 in agent fees with $5,000 COV minimum.

 

OPTION 2: Buying direct from HDB by balloting

Abdul Khir found this option cheaper than the resale market price as it depends on the queue system. The first time he went for balloting, his queue was the last two numbers at 148. This means he will be given cheaper priced flats. However, the only available three-room flat left was one in Queenstown priced at $250,000 – way beyond his HDB loan eligibility.

He tried the second time where the subsequent queue numbers were higher than the number of allocated flats. His queue was 632 during the second ballot, pricing him out from the primary market.

“I grew fed up and decided to give up on buying a new flat. I am now applying for a rental flat in Bedok and Tampines area,” says the 27-year-old technical specialist.

 

Profit before public service?

The HDB has served the nation well when it first started by providing affordable homes for all. This has generated wealth for Singaporean homeowners to upgrade to bigger houses as their properties increased in value.

Malaysian urban planners and authorities recently cited this wealth creation system as a role model for public housing which has enabled low-income families to move up the wealth ladder.

However, the system in the current climate, has shown that it does have its limitations. For the first time genuine homeowner trying to move up the wealth ladder, the barriers to entry are now higher. One cannot help but feel that the HDB is now acting like a private developer by offering flats at market prices.

HDB has defended itself by saying this is the fairest way of pricing new HDB flats while ensuring equitable distribution of subsidies. But the fact remains.

HDB flats have become too correlated to the private property market with the highest bidder having a distinct advantage.

The price gap between an HDB flat and private home prices have now narrowed. Currently, a five-room HDB flat in a mature estate fetches between $500, 000 to $600, 000, while some two to three bedroom condo units in the heartlands are going for $600,000 to $700,000.

In a recent reply to the Straits Times Forum, HDB also said a five-room resale flat in a non-mature estate is priced at an average of $364,000. (read letter here)

However, statistics from HDB’s website show that the only areas having a price close to what it mentioned are Woodlands ($340, 000), Sembawang ($362, 000) Choa Chu Kang ($360, 000), and Yishun ($365, 000). Even five-room flats in non-mature estate like Jurong West are priced at $372, 000.

The HDB has also defended its track record saying public housing is still “affordable” by spewing data on “affordability”. However, these data mean nothing for the average man on the streets, who feels that HDB flats are no longer affordable.

If the current trend were to continue, would our future generation then be able to afford a roof over their head? If HDB flats are indeed affordable, why do Singaporeans feel the pinch?

In addition, the HDB has failed to increase supply to keep up with the influx of foreigners, pushing property prices upwards.

Perhaps, in their bid to soothe frayed nerves and improve public opinion, Minister Mah recently announced that more flats would be built to keep up with increased demand. However, this measure has come a tad bit too late as COVs are set to continue rising.

Did the HDB not envisage this problem in the beginning? The fact that COVs for HDB resale flats has doubled in a month amid the most severe recession in Singapore suggests that there are anomalies in our public housing system that needs to be fixed.

Minister Mah had also said that Singaporeans are choosey by wanting to live in certain places that are near to their parents’. But isn’t this in line with the government’s pro family public housing policy?

Perhaps the real issue runs deeper.

“Maybe what Singaporeans are telling the government is that they are unhappy that permanent residents are pushing the COV prices beyond the affordability range, not because HDB prices have become less affordable per se,” says Shams.

What say you?

Note: Attempts have been made to contact the HDB on the average cost on building a unit of HDB flat. HDB responded asking for the reasons for this request which we subsequently replied. Since then, we have not heard from them.

 

About the Author:

Khalil Adis was a former editor for Property Report magazine covering Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia. During his course of work he has travelled to all three countries to cover their property markets extensively. He has also interviewed politicians like Singapore’s Minister for National Development Mah Bow Tan, Kuala Lumpur’s Mayor Dato’ Ahmad Fuad Ismail and Malaysia’s Energy, Green Technology and Water Minister Datuk Peter Chin. He now writes for Property Report, Property Guru and Temasek Review.

You can read more of Khalil’s articles on:

www.property-report.com and www.propertyguru.com.sg

 

Related articles:

>> Number of applicants exceed number of flats

>> HDB to increase supply of flats

>> Mah: don’t compare with prices in the past

>> ERA: 40 per cent of HDB flat buyers are PRs

 

Related Posts

32 Responses to “Public housing affordability: HDB versus Singaporeans”

  • Grim Reaver:

    New PRs, when buying public housing, should only be allowed to select flats that Singaporeans dont want to stay in.

    Those leftover flats that even after a few years remain unoccupied.

  • Bong Tiok Tsai:

    The property market in Singapore, even Public Housing, is like a hot air baloon now.

    Very soon, only the PRs and the better off Singaporeans will be able to buy re-sale HDB apartments.

    It defeats the purpose of Public Housing.

  • D:

    I remember at 1 stage of time, HDB did says that they cannot allow ppl to make use of HDB to make money. The HDB flats are mean for singapore citizens to have a home to stay and not using it to making a profit by doing buying and selling of the flats. I would want to ask why the Gov allows it to happen now?????????? Because the so call FT got money to invest in it so the they can get a PR???????? Then followed by citizenship and then make use of it to migrate elsewhere. And all this is in the expense of the native local S’porean.

  • Jeremy A Y:

    The REAL problem is the People Accept.
    If they accept as they have always accepted, what is the need to bother voicing up for singaporeans?

    Its really the people rather than the system.

  • ocean:

    “Attempts have been made to contact the HDB on the average cost on building a unit of HDB flat. HDB responded asking for the reasons for this request which we subsequently replied. Since then, we have not heard from them.”
    HDB’s stone-wall attitude is predictable. They asked for reasons for request but actually no reason is good enough for them. With PAP backing them, their arrogance has grown over the years. What do you expect from someone like Malboro Tan as snakehead? Only by throwing out the pappies can Singaporeans see improvement.

  • Teh:

    Since most of the PRs have no intention to sink their roots in Singapore (by taking up citizenship) why should Singapore government allow them to buy HDB flats???? Why not restrict such flats, new and resale, to Singaporeans only??? As you can see for yourself in the property ads, agents blatantly court the PR buyers by stating “PR can.”

    Let the PRs cough up more money to buy private property. After all, they are taking jobs from Singaporeans already.

  • kingrant:

    “Did the HDB not envisage this problem in the beginning? The fact that COVs for HDB resale flats has doubled in a month amid the most severe recession in Singapore suggests that there are anomalies in our public housing system that needs to be fixed.”

    I daresay the govt has been caught napping. On one hand, it is giving away PRs like crazy, but on the other hand, HDB has not kept up with a potential swell in demand from these new entrants. Credit this to a far-sighted govt.

  • Time for Change:

    Residents of Hougang in Aljunied GRC will soon get better sports facilities under the Neighbourhood Renewal Programme.
    ================================================================
    Residents of Aljunied have been neglected since the 2006 GE. It appears that elections are around the corner.

    However, since most Aljunied resident have probably lost their jobs to foreigners, a lot of good these facilties will do for them. I believe it will be the foreigners who will be utilizing these facilties while Singaporeans struggle to put food on the table for themselves and their children.

    What Singaporeans want are jobs paying decent salaries.

  • silenceisgolden:

    Those who own properties are smiling while those who don’t fawn. The government does not need to be apologetic as they have actually help to up your net worth. You should thank them.

  • sgpolitico:

    Well said “Time for Change” this is the same old story with PAP, just when elections are around the corner they start their wayang , LUP, new facilities, GST credits etc…
    I hope most Singaporeans will not be swayed by this

    We want jobs thats what we want paying a decent salary !!

    Get this in your heads PAP !!

    I appeal to all Singaporeans instead of talking and writing about your unhappiness , pls vote the opposition so that you can make your voices be heard. and teach the gahmen a lesson for neglecting to protect BORN IN SINGAPORE singaporeans who all these years worked hard to grow this country, served NS, paid taxes and CPF etc…

  • cy:

    china has 3 huge mountains, education,medical care and housing.

    looks like we are also facing these mountains, with the ever increasing cost of education,medical care and housing

  • Liang:

    Do you think there will be a election at this point of time?…No way

  • Grim Reaver:

    As earlier posted, I’m also for the idea that FT / PR, should not be allowed to buy new / resale HDB flats. They should be in the private market. With that, I think COV will be reduced substantially w/o the need of any laws watsoever.

    If COV is banned, it will just end up under table. So by doing the above, it will reduce the demand for HDB flats ( price & COV if any go down) & the price of private property will go up. ( This is ok coz private property is a luxury, not a need. )

    So please, ban the FT/PR from buying new/resale HDB flats. Local born Singaporeans should always come first. Dont let Singaporeans become Sinkaporeans & experience that sinking & depressed feeling every day. I will vote for change.

  • Someone ran a poll on HWZ on this topic as well…

    Totally Unaffordable 53 39.26%
    Slightly Unaffordable 34 25.19%
    Barely Affordable 41 30.37%
    Comfortably Affordable 7 5.19%
    Voters: 135.

    http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/showthread.php?t=2526061&page=7

  • csl:

    PR-PR couples cannot get new flats. Neither are they getting any grant. Only applies when PR-Citizen get flats, this one not so much of a problem.

    Barring them from HDB flats altogether may or may not alleviate the problem. They will have to rent which might reduce their willingness to settle down while waiting to be eligible for citizenship. I am unsettled over this as the effect could be adverse on existing home owners of the PR-PR couple variety. Do they sell back to HDB?

    What happens to their loans? All sorts of things to consider. Yeah deep down we might go “orbeequak who ask u go and price out true-blue singaporeans” but then they are people too….

  • COV:

    i just turned 35 and i am looking for a 3 room flat. I am not a high income earner, just earning what most average grads would earn. Every seller is asking for cov and some even as high as 50k.

    If i were to buy a $600k private property, i will only need to pay 5% ($30k) of the initial downpayment in cash + stamp duty that is 3% of selling price – $5.4k ($12.6k)or if i choose to pay from my cpf i can pay an admin fee of not more than a few hundred and legal fees (of $2.5-3k) part of which can be recovered from the bank. so i will only need $32,700-$45,300 upfront in cash which is still less than the cov flat sellers are asking.

    In order for me to buy a unit in the gettos with football marks on the walls, danger of getting robbed in the lifts, easy public access to my properties and with no private facilities, I have to set aside more cash than it is needed for a private property with security and facilities that is double the price. Now where is the logic?

    Every time i make an offer with whatever little cash i have in my savings (after taking out the 5% in cash needed for bank loan and the couple of thousands for furniture), my offer gets rejected. If I have that kind of money wouldnt I be buying something more luxurious?

    I am a grad who earn an average wage but i have since been relegated to the likes of the lower income group who cannot even afford a decent home in the gettos.

    I guess such is life in singapore, very soon many people in my generation and after will be waiting for our parents to kick the bucket so that we can have a roof over our heads. meanwhile we can continue living with our siblings and parents in cramp conditions. perhaps someday in the not too distance future, my siblings and i can pool our resources together and time share a hdb flat and use it as a weekend getaway from each other.

  • Actually wonder if anybody thought of this…

    we all ready know of PRC so called talented students who came to singapore on given study scholarships from PAP gov’t…we know quite a number after completing their studies…disappear and end up in china again…”free education all right for them but not for local students”…

    Will some of these PRC PRs do the same with the HDB property if they can’t service/pay the loans…

    So who get the fall out…

    Is it us again directly and in-directly? Or the PAP and its approved PAP policy makers?

  • angry_one:

    I wonder how many sinkees will vote against the PAP because of this. I mean, there are many locals who actually make big money by selling off their old flats by big margins. There are others to make money by renting out to foreigners, or manage foreigners’ housing. The PAP has benefited them, in their opinion.

  • 2nd class citizen:

    Govt not protecting their own citizens, just like parents not protecting their children. The principle is there.

  • Aiyoyo:

    How will the ordinarily Singaporeans be able to contribute to their parents, raise their kids, save for a rainy day and budget for their retirement if the standard response and reply is simply ‘Affordable’. Maybe MBT and the ‘Rest’ should all forgo the bonuses and take only half of the salaries becos it is also affordable!

  • Mainstreet Citizen:

    If hdb flats are limited in mature estates, then Why allow PRs to buy Hdb flats in mature estates? Afterall, even Singaporean singles, was only allowed to buy Hdb resale flats in mature estates in the 20th century!

  • Mainstreet Citizen:

    How will the ordinarily Singaporeans be able to contribute to their parents, raise their kids, save for a rainy day and budget for their retirement if the standard response and reply is simply ‘Affordable’. Maybe MBT and the ‘Rest’ should all forgo the bonuses and take only half of the salaries becos it is also affordable!

  • BuiTaHan:

    The economics growth is no longer irrelevant to ordinary citizen because the price of the good raise much faster than wages. PAP think that locals are “Kia See” and do not dare to vote against them.

  • Ah Gong:

    Singaporean have too much money locked into house, CPF as well as too much is being indirectly taxed to feed GOV cofer, feeding GIC, TMS, are left with no cash. Who would dare to venture our on business and new ideas where CPF itself is not a safe safety net….

  • A P:

    Public housing becomes Pubic Housing. Only those of huge bank account need apply

  • BuiTaHan:

    The current government is driven by GDP figure and care less about the well being of it’s citizen. Those who bought the property recently will spend the rest of life paying the loan. The only thing we can do is to vote against them or we will have to bite the bullet and suffer in silence!!!!

  • whatdemocracy:

    I say Mah Bow Tan is AN IDIOT! HDB is no longer for the people! IT’s just pro-profit!! $10 per application for the flats??? With each release of flats, how much do they make? Just look at their website now…17907 applications for a miserly 2131 flats…that’s $179,070 just to process applications? What Bullshit!

    And HDB will NEVER reveal the costs of building a flat… it will be murder. IT doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that it doesn’t cost much to build one! They are making TONS of MONEY!

    Mah Bow Tan is an IDIOT. In fact, all PAP ministers are!

    I mean what the hell do they do? I don’t even see them in my neighborhood at all! Except for some lousy festive banners or when election is due. You call that leaders? Stop counting your disgracefully huge and undeserved salary and get your asses down to the ground and do some work!

  • Tololen:

    Ask not what the gahment can do for you.
    Ask what can you do for yourself.
    Ren bu wei ji, tian zhu di mie.

  • BuiTaHan:

    The only way out is not to vote for the current government who had not been performing satisfactory since the last election!!! Otherwise, we will continue to be victimized by them !!!!

  • I love my country:

    “WhatDemocracy” You just highlighted we do indeed have our smartest the brightest as Ministers!

  • Tony Lee:

    To Grim Reaver on Mon, 12th Oct 2009 9:09 am

    New PRs, when buying public housing, should only be allowed to select flats that Singaporeans dont want to stay in.

    Those leftover flats that even after a few years remain unoccupied.

    Hi, it would be unfair

    fairer proposal or suggestion would be to impose a capital gain tax if they sell later but if they take up citizenship then they get to keep the profits.

  • SingaporeanInNz:

    Great article! I think Govt need to step in and address the current situation. The property market and steep housing prices are certainly not helping those who are first time buyers.

Search Our Site
Sponsored Advertisement
Your Banner Here For US$200
Donation 1Your Ad Here from US$100 a monthDonation 3
Sponsored Advertisement
MBA Program
Most Recent Comments
  • New Citizen: 猴子会做工,也会被政 精英引入新加坡劳动 场. If one day we can find a...
  • whatever: Yet another fool who praises maoism and defends the great leap forward/ cultural revolution. You...
  • Political Wizard: Aljunied supporters have stand tall with Hougang supporters the last G.E. They are likely...
  • eaglefly: PRAY THAT THE NATION IS BEHIND YOU EVERY INCH OF THE WAY.
  • Born a British Subject: Thank You Mr. Yaw Shin Leong, you happened to be caught in the flow of...
  • Bird: Singapore should follow Mao’s 1950 idea and start another round of campaign 人多好办事 to...
  • Houganese: With due respect to Mr Png and WP, even if it is any other party and a dog were to stand in this...
  • Farc: Mao had to push the reset button when wealth was in the hands of just a few. Sounds pretty much like...
  • eaglefly: HELLO, EVERYONE KNOWS BUYING ARMS IS ONE METHOD OF CHANNELING MONEY, DIRTY OR STOLEN FROM ONE...
  • regime change: After reading 5,000 years of history in less than 5 minutes, my understanding of the author...
  • Not a local election: Hougang voters should understand that there is no such thing as a local election....
  • oxygen: HOUGANG VOTER TELLS MY MIND OF THIS COMICAL COMEDY he does not understand – they received 3...
  • ah lian: Ok lah… Since he’s no longer an MP or a WP member, apology “for the whole...
  • 西北杜南: 叫职总的Lim Sia Suay (林丢脸) 去收拾碗碟, 看他怎样提高生产力...
  • eaglefly: You may justifiably question which idiot will buy a company that is worth $1.5b and overpay by...
  • China Kia: Oh dear…
  • Ontheroad.: Very boring reading all this. By now don’t need this type of article infact local should...
  • Soon shock and cry: The sharp rise in expenditure by SMRT will soon be passed on to the public. When they...
  • Thanks to TAX PAYERS: tax payers over the last 50 years provide the money NS boys provide the cheap labour...
  • john loh: Uncanny resemblance to Harold Shaw, especially those ET eyes.
  • eaglefly: Maybe some competent journalist from SPH can do a piece on this topic to refute the arguments of...
  • Sperm: If not for PAP losing and almost opposition wards being contested , you thing they will change
  • To the Editor: To the Editor of the Straits Times, It is simple, there has always been 2 routes in front of...
  • parachute into politics: 3 star crap: 3 star or 5 star crap, i dont give a fug about SAF...
  • AngryLocal: pit bull: let’s see if there are bus loads of uncle and aunties from the grass roots org...
  • eaglefly: THAT IS WHY MM SAID LOCALS ARE DAFT……….. THEY CANNOT THINK OF WHAT IS HAPPENING...
  • amdew: I will be going tonight to lend support to WP.
  • PRC citizen: I agree that most of the Sporean drivers are strictly trained and law abiding. However,from...
  • Apolitical: Wow! Mao sounded like such a nice person every mother would wish her daughter could marry. Have...
  • slave society: The regime has almost filled up more than 70 percent of the bus companies with PRC drivers....
  • oxygen: M C HAMMER, it is the BY-ELECTION SEASON! The irony of near perfect coincidence of these events is...
  • Good Going: Very very good. SDP is getting more and more credible. Come next election 2016 I will again...
  • "early" by election: TAKE BICYCLE &amp& #59; NOT THE M ;TRAIN: what exactly is...
  • eaglefly: NO BODY IN THE RIGHT MIND WOULD CARE OR GET INVOLVED, ALL SIMPLY BECAUSE, THEY ARE OVER PAID...
  • Ma Chi the Dead Investor: @Wolverine did ask a good question. If Salverin have renounced his US Citizenship...
  • Bus Captain: MC Hammer The inescapable Law of Economics must apply right? Where is the Santa Claus? Nothing...
  • 如猴子会做工!: 我们知道,价格应是由 场的供给和需求来...
Sponsored Advertisement
Donations Received
$5157 USD of $50,000 USD
Site Announcement
Stats wef 7 April 2012

Visitors

  • Last 24 hours: 15,185
  • Last 7 days: 150,536
  • Last 30 days: 939,640
  • Online Now: 4334
Official FaceBook
Advertisement
Enter Google Analytics Code Here