Extra ballot for children of Singapore citizens to apply for places in primary schools

Written by Our Correspondent

In another sign that elections will be called anytime soon next year, the ruling party has allocated one additional ballot for Singaporeans to apply for places in primary schools for their children to “sweeten” the ground.

The new rule will take effect from 2010. As of now, Signaporeans and PRs both have one chance to ballot which had caused considerable unhappiness among some Singapore citizens whose children are unable to get into the primary school of their choice.

Balloting is done when the number of applications is more than the available vacancies. In popular schools, Singapore citizens often have to compete with PRs for a place which led many to vent their frustration on the government for not looking after the interests of citizens first.

The issue sparked an outcry in August this year when a Mr Eduard Tay wrote in to the Straits Times Forum complaining about his son’s unsuccessful application for a place in a neighborhood school as he has to vie with children registered under Phase 1A, 2A1, 2A2, 2B and first-generation permanent residents’ (PRs) children under Phase 2C.

His letter prompted an almost immediate response from an Indian PR Mrs Sweta Agarwal who justified the equal chance given to PRs because they “pay taxes and abide by Singapore’s laws”.  She also issued a veiled threat that PRs may consider leaving Singapore if their children cannot get into the schools of their choice.

Mrs Agarwal’s insensitive letter triggered a massive furore among Singaporeans. Mr Jimmy Loke replied a day letter castigating Mrs Agarwal for not taking up citizenship after a lengthy six years as a PR.

“Mrs Agarwal has the option of returning to her country to find a good school for her daughter. Mr Tay’s child does not enjoy that luxury. As a Singaporean, Mr Tay served national service for 21/2 years and spent 13 more years as a reservist. Should any government not take care of its citizens first?”, he added.

The deluge of letters published in the Straits Times Forum showed that the equal chance enjoyed by PRs in primary school application is becoming a point of contention among Singaporeans, especially those from the middle class.

Besides having two chances to ballot, school fees for PRs and foreign students will also be increased by between $36.50 and $73 per month and between $100 and $400 per month respectively from 2011, while school fees for Singaporeans will remain unchanged.

According to the state media, “these changes were announced by Minister of Education Ng Eng Hen on Sunday during a community visit and is part of the Government’s move to sharpen differentiation between Singaporeans and non-citizens.”

With more and more foreigners and PRs working and living in Singapore, the additional ballot does not increase the chances of Singaporeans getting their children into a preferred school since they now have to compete with a larger pool of applicants.

Furthermore, the token increase in school fees is of scant consolation to Singaporeans since foreigners and PRs who are able to enrol their children in Singapore schools should be pretty well to do in the first place.

Despite widespread resentment and anger at the ruling party’s pro-foreigner policy, it continues to insist that immigration is “essential” for Singapore.

In a recent speech, MM Lee Kuan Yew ticked off Japanese leaders publicly for not “adopting” Singapore’s open-door policy to replenish its declining population via immigration.

Unless the ruling party makes wholesale changes to its current policy and limit the influx of foreigners into Singapore, even two or three ballots may not be sufficient for Singaporeans in the future.

 

Related articles:

>> Sweta Agarwal proud to be Indian citizen and Singapore PR at the same time 

>> PRs get equal chance in Primary 1 registration

>> MM Lee defends need for foreign talent

>> PRC student supports government’s plan for more foreign scholars

 

Related Posts

22 Responses to “Extra ballot for children of Singapore citizens to apply for places in primary schools”

  • wat?:

    another candy! woohoo!

  • stan:

    this is what we call the carrot hanging from the tree that lures you into voting for them……. it’s been so many years.. now then shove out this deal ah… a little too late lar… see ur red underwear until dont want to see already…

  • rabblerouser:

    I am just wondering if that carrot had to be dangled in the 1st place. A reaction to a failed policy perhaps?

  • THE BIG EYE:

    oo… PAP finally realizing the young S’poreans are fucking pissed with the foreigners and might just kick them out of power within the next decade. But by doing this, they’re just plainly insulting our intelligence.

    Money happens to be the least of their problems. Raising the bar by a few bucks ain’t gonna stop em from coming. You wanna make a real deal?

    Until all S’poreans get their places, foreigners can’t enter. Applies across the board from primary to university. Else we don’t see any need to keep a government that does not work for the people’s benefit, contrary to the name “Peoples Action Party”–one that takes action AGAINST the people.

  • dt:

    Mr Jimmy Loke replied a day letter castigating Mrs Agarwal for not taking up citizenship after a lengthy six years as a PR.
    i think it should be “a day later”. just fyi for admin.

  • songsonggaojurong:

    You guys are looking the wrong way. With these sweeteners, always look at it from the other side. Rather than protect the citizens which they will claim, it is used to entice more PRs to take on citizenship.

  • janetnt:

    since foreigners and PRs who are able to enrol their children in Singapore schools should be pretty well to do in the first place.

    this statement is false and misleading, i remember in my sec sch days, i had classmate who won torn clothing and father is a carpenter. He was at that point of time a PR. He finished top of the school and is now a singaporean citizen.

    Not all PR are rich.

  • Yamasam:

    First they screw you hoping that you don’t realise it.

    When it finally dawn on you that you are being screwed big time, they throw in some KY just to make it less painful. But you are still getting screwed.

    If they are serious in giving priority to Singaporean, cap the number of places for PRs and foreigners to say 10%. If there are more applicants than number of places available, then PRs/foreigners will ballot for the 10% places among themselves while Singaporean will ballot for the 90% among Singaporeans.

    We can still achieve the goal of having foreigners among our student population for whatever benefits as touted by the govt.

  • James:

    Is this really the best our (PAP) government can provide for Singaporeans? I don’t think so.

    How big is this “P1 registration” problem to the every-other Singaporean?

    The every-other Singaporean in his 40s is probably jobless because unregulated cheap labour have stolen his job or made him cheaper (and working harder to die FASTER, BETTER for govt can import more cheap labour), barely surviving every month but not enough to save up for retirement. Nevermind retirement; when he is worked to death there is no need for retirement. These ministers need to share their wealth with the people. The every-other Singaporean cannot be suffering at the expense of making millionaire ministers!

    On the other hand there are the ones who have just come out to work or just got married. Straight away they get into a 300-400k debt. The last thing on their minds is having a baby – even more costs to take care of! Why not calculate the money benefit derived from importing cheap labour and use it to really take care of the next generation of Singaporeans (like a monthly payout, paying for all the costs of pregancy care all the way to giving birth… or something!)? Then people would be more willing to procreate and the population growth can recover using true blue Singaporeans? If this goes on and locals are not willing to have babies, this P1 registration thingy is a joke just like the baby bonus scheme. Taking care of a child is a 20+ year (or lifetime) commitment – a single payout won’t help a lot. And the ones that are single are more likely to be single because getting married and having children becomes such a big money headache.

    Hello LKY and MBT. If you release one BTO project every month and open the floodgates at the same time, Singaporeans still suffer because the housing price will never come down. And doing it suddenly is very fake; people can see you are trying to save your asses. It should have been done earlier! Affordable housing? 100k 3-room flats open to every single Singaporean regardless of single/married & income is a good start to being affordable. Let people get a small house first and if they think it is good to have a larger family then naturally they’ll get a larger house. No need to tie them down with a 300k debt at the start.

    If this PAP government does not want really to share the wealth spinned by the slogging of true blue Singaporeans. It is ok, Singaporeans can leave. You know – just uproot and leave! Our forefathers are immigrants to start off with. They moved here to provide their next generation with a better place because conditions at home were screwed up. Now if we are unable to vote in a government that can make things right for Singaporeans, then it is time to leave. It is nothing wrong. Don’t bother “stayers” that look down on you and say you are “giving up”, you are merely seeking a better life just like what all our forefathers did before.

  • Chiiies:

    Instead of dealing issues that really concern Singaporean i.e. high cost of living and congested living place due to large influx of foreigner, the government just wayang on the primary school registration which is definitely not a concern to many Singaporean. This type of turn deaf attitude toward real issues really piss Singaporean off ! LHL is really an incompetent PM who only knows how to burn onion and chillies from prevent the rain from coming down.

  • cat:

    Also, how do we know if one more ballot is enough?

  • ideaquest:

    There is nothing preventing them from revising the fees again after the elections … citing comparable and competitive market rates.

  • The Big Eye:

    To PAP, if you think the young generation poses little threat to you, try this — my parents won’t vote for PAP, cause I’ll kick them outta the tiny overpriced HDB if they do. Everyone should do the same.

  • MenInBlue:

    Let me learn to ‘predict’ as like the old ‘Great One’….

    “Increase of fees for citizens after GE” (to match that of PR)

    Lets see if this prediction comes true in 2011 then…

  • blackfeline:

    as usual…moron singaporeans will bite the bait…mark my word!

  • jolly:

    it is very unfortunate that local singaporeans have to bear with all the distress causd by the bad management of the minister in charge. after taken and still taking hefty salaries, can he not realise the grievance that he is dishing out to his fellow citizen. it must be stressed that they are put in place by the people to look after the welfare of the people and not foreigners first. this Pri 1 registration exercise is all cosmetic in nature. and is the govt oblivious to the fact that the foreign talented families are very rich . this is based on the fact found on the ground. they can afford luxeries that many locals could not afford. time for change.

  • Wizard of Id:

    Here they go again…. the MIW spin doctors… coming up with a novel world class solution to a problem that they created in the first place. I watched the patronizing attitude of the Minister on television last night and it reminded me of an Emperor throwing scraps of stale bread to his starving subjects. Even after announcing this Great Concession, he was quick to point out that it didn’t mean that PRs are no longer at the same level as citizens in other policy areas. They continue to be favored as much as or even more than citizens. This said of course to appease the potential anger of the PRs who will leave the country if they are so much as as placed lower than citizens. PRs have a way to go about this problem, become citizens! What is so difficult about it?
    A ballot is still a ballot. Tell me, how are they going to ensure an even distribution takes place. Why do citizens have to ballot against PRs? Shouldn’t the needs of citizens be met first? What value is there in citizenship?
    The Minister and this policy is not really trying to appease and placate the citizens. This policy is designed to attract more PRs to apply for citizenship because the PRs are smarter than you think. They know that there is no value in citizenship because as PRs they have all the benefits without the liabilities of citizenship. Wake up Singaporeans, don’t listen to the hen who talks cock.

  • Is it me or is it really that election are coming soon? I got that feeling yesterday watching the news…Dr Ng Hen Heng commenting on the extra ballot, and then Ms Lim Hwee Hua talking about Singaporean 1st…

    Pardon me..if I say elections is within the horizon.

  • MenInBlue:

    Let me do another ‘prediction’ as like the old ‘Great One’….

    “GE would take place in 2010” (perhaps soon after Budget Day)

    Lets see if this prediction comes true in 2010 then…

  • cy:

    i won’t say that the jack up in fees are token, but they reported that subsidies are still given to PR’s children except that it is smaller from 2011 onwards.

    this shows that pressure on pap is working, but for them to truly reform, we still need real check and balances.

    Afterall, pap is like microsoft windows, always crashing but ppl still has to use it, we need linux,chrome (opposition) to counter-balance it.

  • MenInBlue:

    @cy
    u forgot the mac OSX :)

    Not only to counter-balance it, but to ensure the quality of policies and bills being passed in parliament. Raise GST to help the poor? They must be joking…

  • Singapolung:

    Whatttttttttttttt !!!!! The increase only starts in year 2011 !!!!!!!!!! the increase in the fee must be NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!! NOw ! Now ! Now !

Search Our Site
Sponsored Advertisement
Your Banner Here For US$200
Donation 1Your Ad Here from US$100 a monthDonation 3
Sponsored Advertisement
MBA Program
Most Recent Comments
  • Emeritus Singaporean: It seems that either the name “Temasek Review” is not the exclusive to...
  • virgo49: concerned sporean: Hello Singaporeans, let me relate to you about the costs of health care....
  • guan ah: The BE in Hougang is not just another local by election. This BE is timely, come one year after...
  • old lady: WP did the most honourable thing. Sack its own MP becasue of his transgression. Can’t say...
  • truedirect: What’s new with our media and they are PAP mouthpiece.. so don’t bother to read...
  • van: singapore will lose its cultural identity and security with the influx of pinoys, we will be at the...
  • juy: So you mean TRE is a forum where quality of evidence is not impt (or not even required) and you can...
  • boh liao: Oh I believed him. Cos I was only born yesterday.
  • Sw: Look like idiot.
  • Sengsoon: Another Potong Pasir: Hougang residents may think otherwise! After 20 yrs suffering for...
  • Funny: So worker party supporters nv play Diablo 3?
  • Heartlander: DPM,quit telling us what to think and what to do. We are not children, zombies or robots. We...
  • awakening: ai yoh ! what kind of mentality for a MP hopeful? tsk, tsk ! Nobody turns up most probably...
  • Androporean: Even US military flooded with Chinese fake parts! http://www.channelnewsasia....
  • guan ah: By the same logic, why don’t PAP sends their best candidate, i.e LHL or one of the 2 DPMs to...
  • My Father Said: In life, ones got to learn to walk straight with your nose up, don’t look left, right...
  • Keith Low: DPM Teo keeps saying WP is taking the voters of HG for granted and whether they are putting the...
  • grammar teacher: It’s so not funny
  • 龙的传人: 根据从本地读者调查报 告,本地报章ST不论销 ,可信度,凖切度...
  • Justice Pow: Sorry, the State Times is pwned lock stock and barrel by the PAP. It is only allowed to play...
  • Son of Braddell Heights: Vote for WP!!! During GE 2011, I convinced my family, my relatives, my friends, my...
  • claude: If TRE can censor and delete readers views, why can’t ST?
  • virgo49: huat ah: never respect this “slept in parliament” guy. you guys just never stop talking...
  • Hang: Dear “Independent Observer”, Your latest post reveals the following weakness of 5,000...
  • Snog dog: Massive turn out today in WP’s rally . I can’t believe it. At least 15 thousand...
  • 民怨之韾: MSM should conduct an interview with us ( old timer) .First of all ,since the constitution...
  • Sg boy: Gay guy in not happy about Singapore shocker! Gay voice, no credibility
  • Azenable: really interesting how many TRE see the article but never really read it…
  • Concerned about Singapore: WP Rally at Hougang just ended. It is absolutely pouring but most of the...
  • ralph nader: Yes it is a referendum on the PAP 1 Year record. I am not a resident from Hougang but the past...
  • news watcher: U dunno the real reason meh. These few days everyone staying home read newspaper and internet...
  • BillyMa: About 950 at desmond choo’s rally. About 650 were there becos they’re told to. 200...
  • What: DPM Teo is the head of civil service. BEfore he calls WP foul, he should exercise a core value of the...
  • ROFL: LOL. the intelligence of TRE readers is astounding. The joke is on you guys.
  • Ain't got boss: Not only terrify, he ain’t got boss to shake.
  • guan ah: PAP cocked this up, the reason is probably the SBS buses allocated to pick up D C supporters broke...
  • NTUC worker: Voters of Hougang make sure to make Papee Desmond lose his deposit and citizens of Hougang,...
  • Is this true?: Is this true story?
Sponsored Advertisement
Donations Received
$6517 USD of $50,000 USD
Site Announcement
Stats wef 7 April 2012

Visitors

  • Last 24 hours: 18,674
  • Last 7 days: 128,260
  • Last 30 days: 853,372
  • Online Now: 5731
Official FaceBook
Advertisement
Enter Google Analytics Code Here