Opposition should emulate Pakatan and adopt a common policy platform for next GE

OPINION

The Malaysian opposition Pakatan Rakyat coalition held its first convention last Saturday where it unveiled a common policy platform which promise sweeping reforms to the nation on three fronts: democracy, economy and social justice.

Pakatan aims to overhaul to race-based policies of the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition and replace it with one which is more fair and equitable to all the races in Malaysia. It also advocates reforms in the political system, judiciary and the media.

Malaysia’s opposition won an unprecedented 82 out of 222 seats during the 2008 general elections which saw them denying Barisan its traditional two-thirds majority in parliament for the first time in Malaysia’s history.

It comprises of three ideologically different parties – the liberal Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), the Chinese-based Democratic Action Party (DAP) and the Islamist Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS).

Despite the wide gulf between the three, especially between DAP and PAS, they manage to put their differences aside and hammer out a common platform to stand on in order to mount a credible challenge to Barisan Nasional.

Despite occasional hiccups, Pakatan’s dramatic transformation from a loose “marriage of convenience” to a structured coalition will surely put it in a strong position to offer Malaysians an alternative to the incumbent.

All the three major opposition parties realize that they have no choice but to work together. If they fight the battle separately on their own, they will never stand a chance of defeating the formidable Barisan Nasional.

What does the Singapore opposition hope to achieve in the next general election? Are the parties there just to make up the numbers or to give the PAP a run for its money?

In order for the opposition to punch well above its weight and tap on the widespread anger on the ground against the PAP, they have to come together and adopt a common policy platform.

It is simply not enough to defeat the PAP based on protest votes alone. The opposition needs to spell out an alternative vision for Singapore – what changes will they make if they should come to power one day so as to win the support, trust and allegiance of Singaporeans.

They already have their work cut short. The ground sentiment is in favor of them. A rising number of Singaporeans are getting peeved at the PAP’ for its ill-conceived immigration policies, high prices of HDB flats and the lack of accountability in the system.

All the opposition needs to do now is to convince at least half of the fence-sitters who make up about 40 per cent of the electorate to vote for them and it is not impossible to have a repeat of Malaysia’s political tsunami here.

On paper, many of the reforms proposed by Pakatan Rakyat are applicable in Singapore too – for example, separation of powers to ensure checks and balances among the branches of the executive, judicial and legislative, a clean, free and fair electoral system as well as a free and independent media.

The opposition’s common manifesto must cater to all strata of Singapore society from the very poor to the very rich across all levels of education and qualification.

Without coming together as one single coalition like Malaysia’s opposition, none of the opposition parties in Singapore can take on the PAP on their own.

If DAP and PAS can work together, why can’t SDP, WP, NSP, SPP and RP set aside their petty and superficial differences and start strategizing for the next general election?

Singaporeans are sick and tired with the PAP’s “grow at all cost” policy which has caused tremendous hardships to many people, especially those from the lower income group.

The relentless influx of foreigners over the last few years has changed the demographics of our little island to beyond recognition, whose result is omnipresent for all to see and it will not dissipate by the time the next election comes.

The opposition should campaign under a single platform so that a vote for any opposition party is both a vote for the entire opposition and a vote for a new Singapore which is radically different from the PAP’s version.

Instead of having different electoral messages which is confusing to the average voter, the opposition should just “strike when the iron is hot” and harp constantly on only one single major issue on the minds of most Singaporeans: foreigners and immigration.

The Singapore Democratic Alliance is a suitable vehicle to house all the opposition parties, be it WP, SDP or NSP and its slogan – “Singapore for Singaporeans” will surely resonate well with ordinary Singaporeans.

There is no more time for childish squabbling or fighting among the opposition for the “spoils” of the election. Each party has to sacrifice a bit for the common good.

So long as the opposition continues to fight the electoral battle individually and separately on their own like in the past, they will continue to remain as punching bags for the PAP.

With public disaffection and disgruntlement against the PAP reaching an all-time high, the next general election is a “do or die” for the opposition.

They have to win at least one GRC and a few more single seats on top of winning more than 40 per cent of the national votes in order to send a strong deterrent message to the PAP that Singaporeans will no longer give it a “blank cheque” to govern and it better start looking after the interests of the people or be prepared to be booted out of office.

Once the opposition is able to secure a breakthrough, more young and qualified Singaporeans will step forward to join them which will herald in a new era in Singapore politics.

It is time we replace this archaic political system meant to entrench one single dominant party in power forever with a competitive multi-party system which will promote good practices, accountability and transparency in the government.

If the opposition continues to falter in the next election, they may not have that many true blue Singaporeans to count on for support in subsequent elections.

Singapore citizens now make up only 64 per cent of the population out of which a significant proportion are new citizens who tend to support the ruling party.

At this rate the PAP is “mass importing” foreigners from elsewhere to become Singapore citizens, native Singaporeans may soon find themselves in the minority one day.

The opposition does not have to look too far for examples to learn from. When the Malaysian opposition is fighting individual battles like they are now in the past, they have never managed to win more than 20 per cent of the seats in the federal parliament.

Now united, albeit loosely under the umbrella of the Pakatan Rakyat coalition, they not only occupy nearly 40 per cent of the seats, but are well poised to win the next general election.

The Singapore Democratic Alliance has the potential to become the Pakatan Rakyat of Singapore if all parties can set aside their differences and work together for the sake of Singaporeans.

The opposition should not think of themselves as separate entities, but as mere representatives of the people to bring out real change in the status quo which has eluded us for far too long.

Only then will they realize that it matters little if they are standing for the elections under the banner of WP, SPP or SDP. What is more important is that they are fighting to reclaim the natural rights of Singaporeans as citizens in their land of birth.

Related Posts

14 Responses to “Opposition should emulate Pakatan and adopt a common policy platform for next GE”

  • lalaland:

    My main beef with Opposition in Spore is that they have big egos that prevents them from working together. Too many Opposition parties for too small an electorate. Why do we need so many Opposition parties for?

    As proposed in yr article, a common manifesto would do if they can get to do this, it would probably be a huge monumental obstacle to them to even think about doing that.

    Opposition unite on these common bugbears among Sporeans wanting a change:

    1) Setting up of minimum wage for lower skilled workers to benefit Spore citizens. Minimum wage to be applied across the board to foreign workers too. This way, Spore citizens will not be eliminated whenever there is a choice between foreigners & Spore citizens.

    2) Revive CPF payout by employers to foreigners on workers permit & employment passes. Foreigners too have to contribute from their paycheck to CPF in addition to employers. This was done way back in the past but was scrapped in the 1990s. Unfair advantage to foreigners. Makes it so cheap to hire foreigners only even for professionals in highly skilled jobs like engineers, bankers, IT profession. CPF claimed it was an admin hassle so it removed this requirement years ago.

    3) Restrict criteria of PRs to highly skilled workers, giving PRs to foreign spouses of Spore citizens is way too lax. PRCs from China seem to enjoy unfair advantage regardless of their skills set.

    4) Restrict PRs to a minimum staying period in Spore to about 3 consecutive years Before they can purchase resale HDB flats. PRs cannot purchase resale HDB flats immediately upon receiving their PR status. They must show commitment to staying put in Spore first. PRs cannot sell their HDB flat until they have stayed in it for at least 5 consecutive years to prevent them from profiteering easily should they decide to return to their homeland. During the 5 consecutive years, they are Not allowed to rent their flats to anyone, they must be resident there.

    Now, can Temasek Review compile one list with recommendations from posters here & post it as one article on yr site & sent it to each Opposition party?

  • lalaland:

    Oh, to clarify point no 4 above. PRs can only rent HDB flats before they reach their 3 year minimum period to purchase flats. However, they can purchase from the private market for condos, private apartments & houses Without any restrictions.

  • cat:

    why can’t they just rent?

    Bermuda has that rule.

  • btan:

    TR, you should sent a copy each to every sec-gens of all the opposition parties.

  • Singaporean:

    The Singapore Democratic Alliance is a suitable vehicle to house all the opposition parties and support “Singapore for Singaporeans!Singapura Untuk Rakyat Singapura!新加坡人的新加坡!

    Let’s join the SDA facebook supporter club and spread the idea across each and every Singaporean. The link http://www.facebook.com/pages/Singapore-Democratic-Alliance-SDA-Supporter/202603113516?ref=ts” or search for Singapore Demoncratic Alliance.

  • cy:

    goh meng seng said in SBF that the opposition are still not ready to form an alliance due to different agendas of each party.

    although i hope they can come together, but no point forcing them when they are not ready. it’s 揠苗助长, in the end you will just see them fighting just like the opposition alliance in malaysia.

    looks like we just need the parties to avoid three-cornered fight.

    New citizen increase will indeed tilt vote to pap but don’t forget that PAP will be losing lot of hardcore supporters as the older generation dies.

  • Singapolung:

    The United States such a big country only have two party :

    Current major parties in America

    * Democratic Party (1792 historic, 1828 modern)
    * Republican Party (1854)

    If singapore, such a small country having at least five political party, is forever not capable to take on the PAP at any level !!!

    In the event, if each opposition party continues to fight among themselves and again in the next General Election still shows very poor results ( just two seats or less than 10% of the overall seats for opposition party )

    It imply that the oppositions are :

    1) not the right calibre to oppose the PAP, in reality, they are constantly helping PAP to rule singapore forever,

    2) not keen to rule singapore at all,

    3) just having the capacity to talk the walk and not walk the talk,

    4) dreaming of hoping to be elected as MP so that they can earn themselves high salary from their present job or career.

    5) always ready to be PAP training punching targets.

    It is time, they put real singaporean as top priority before their party.

    Show the people that all the opposition party(s) can together as ONE party to rule Singapore.

    And the people will empower you !!!!!!!

  • jiangbao:

    Actually within the America 2 main parties, there are many sub groups who would be more than happy to work with the other side. but..

    for our case, it does seem like our opposition work against each other more than the govt. Pretty certain Chiam will never work with CSJ. WP seems fine on their own, will RP work with WP?

  • Singapolung:

    Every opposition party candidates should ask themselves what is their ultimate motive in the political arena ?

    AA) If it is just to make some voices heard, they should make themselves disappeared from now because the ruling party have more than enough “ears & eyes “. Needless for the opposition to spell out any problems in the parliament.

    BB) For anyone, if their intention is dreaming to be MP and collection good pay for next five years, these are the people assisting the ruling party in win again in the next election. The past Election History has proven it. They must be eliminated right now to curb such bad impression to the public.

    ***One of the main reasons why the ruling party is constantly winning the election is because they are always ready to fight and win the election, and not fight and hope to see miracles.

    Very sorry, miracles do not happened in the political stage only ” Political Strength & Strategy Moves ”

    CC) If none of the opposition party members calculated the winning percentage is unlikely. They should join the ruling party thus avoiding making a fool out of themselves!

    And of course the citizens should respect the ruling party the way they wanted it to rule without any complaints.

  • wat?:

    it is not correct to say that US has only 2 parties. it only seems that they have 2, because you don’t hear about the other parties, which are actually quite alot.

  • small hum:

    I wonder if its ever possible that the PAP intentionally created a job market crisis for Singaporeans which spilled into propery, transport and health.

    Thinking as a dictator would, should he not get the favorable responses from his people, he would intentionally create a difficult situation for which the people would be left in a bind? I know from army that is how my CSM creates ‘order’ from the chaos he created himself…. on the pretext that we are not ‘united’ enough.

    On the other hand, maybe PAP has given up on the mess of winning Singaporean hearts and is desperately trying to patch things up by getting as many foreigners to be citizens as much as possible.

    While all the above is purely speculative, the bottom line is we dont really know what is going on in PAP… like whether LHL really did punch someone from the speech GCT gave. If PAP is in a state of flux, we dont know until uncoordinated things happen. I know that the health, transport and housing are having problems. Youth Olympics sports facilities not completed on time, IR having problems too.

    Dare i say… worker facilities in Serangoon was intentional as was the intention to prevent HDB from upgrading flats in Potong Pasir. Could it ever be as personal as maybe LKY getting back at some developer building a condo in front of his house at Oxley Road? I’m just speculating here on the idea on what would the consequence be if ministers of a one-party system here is tired and just about had enough with the dissent because they feel unappreciated.

  • newdawn:

    If the opposition in Singapore wants to win this coming election, it must quickly unite and unveiled a common policy platform just like the Pakatan in Malaysia.
    I would propose a 10 point manifesto that is unambiguous and addresses to the broad spectrum of our society so that when the election comes people would clearly know what they will be voting for.I hope that all you readers could contribute to this manifesto as well.

    My contribution would be
    1. A free press and without press monopoly.
    2. An independent Judiciary.
    3. A proportional representation system in parliament.
    4. No more detention without trial.(ISA)
    5. Free primary and secondary education for citizens.
    6. Nationalization of the public transport system.
    7. A minimum wage system
    8. Anti-discrimination laws (race,age & gender)
    9. Singaporeans first policies
    10. More subsidies and affirmative actions towards the bottom 10% of Singaporeans.

  • BarelyAlive:

    Hmmm… SDP & SDA similar ideologies but I don’t see the two working together.
    WP, RP & NSP are all left-centre parties isn’t it?
    Will KJ & RP work with JBJ’s former comrades?
    NSP is Pro-business & WP have been pushing for workers rights & for depoliticization of unions, universities & civil svc. How do we reconcile the two?

    I think at the moment, it is best for each political parties to go on their own but avoid a 3-way fight. Have a loose-coalition, Fight under a ‘Singapore for Singaporeans’ slogan and support each other’s candidates in order to achieve a multi-party state would be good instead of killing each others’ chances. Then again, I’m not sure if a party wants to be associated with another… Complex problem we have here.

  • PeterL:

    BarelyAlive_

    Very good assessment of the current oppositions and it will take sometime and doing before they become a formidable coalition.

    Going into th GE avoiding a three way fight is the best strategy,will they agree??

    A loose coalition is best to have more oppositions in parliament to see how they will perform and unite as a front after more exposure to parliament’s trial by fire,thus separating the chaff from the husk.

Search Our Site
Sponsored Advertisement
Your Banner Here For US$200
Donation 1Your Ad Here from US$100 a monthDonation 3
Sponsored Advertisement
MBA Program
Most Recent Comments
  • Emeritus Singaporean: It seems that either the name “Temasek Review” is not the exclusive to...
  • virgo49: concerned sporean: Hello Singaporeans, let me relate to you about the costs of health care....
  • guan ah: The BE in Hougang is not just another local by election. This BE is timely, come one year after...
  • old lady: WP did the most honourable thing. Sack its own MP becasue of his transgression. Can’t say...
  • truedirect: What’s new with our media and they are PAP mouthpiece.. so don’t bother to read...
  • van: singapore will lose its cultural identity and security with the influx of pinoys, we will be at the...
  • juy: So you mean TRE is a forum where quality of evidence is not impt (or not even required) and you can...
  • boh liao: Oh I believed him. Cos I was only born yesterday.
  • Sw: Look like idiot.
  • Sengsoon: Another Potong Pasir: Hougang residents may think otherwise! After 20 yrs suffering for...
  • Funny: So worker party supporters nv play Diablo 3?
  • Heartlander: DPM,quit telling us what to think and what to do. We are not children, zombies or robots. We...
  • awakening: ai yoh ! what kind of mentality for a MP hopeful? tsk, tsk ! Nobody turns up most probably...
  • Androporean: Even US military flooded with Chinese fake parts! http://www.channelnewsasia....
  • guan ah: By the same logic, why don’t PAP sends their best candidate, i.e LHL or one of the 2 DPMs to...
  • My Father Said: In life, ones got to learn to walk straight with your nose up, don’t look left, right...
  • Keith Low: DPM Teo keeps saying WP is taking the voters of HG for granted and whether they are putting the...
  • grammar teacher: It’s so not funny
  • 龙的传人: 根据从本地读者调查报 告,本地报章ST不论销 ,可信度,凖切度...
  • Justice Pow: Sorry, the State Times is pwned lock stock and barrel by the PAP. It is only allowed to play...
  • Son of Braddell Heights: Vote for WP!!! During GE 2011, I convinced my family, my relatives, my friends, my...
  • claude: If TRE can censor and delete readers views, why can’t ST?
  • virgo49: huat ah: never respect this “slept in parliament” guy. you guys just never stop talking...
  • Hang: Dear “Independent Observer”, Your latest post reveals the following weakness of 5,000...
  • Snog dog: Massive turn out today in WP’s rally . I can’t believe it. At least 15 thousand...
  • 民怨之韾: MSM should conduct an interview with us ( old timer) .First of all ,since the constitution...
  • Sg boy: Gay guy in not happy about Singapore shocker! Gay voice, no credibility
  • Azenable: really interesting how many TRE see the article but never really read it…
  • Concerned about Singapore: WP Rally at Hougang just ended. It is absolutely pouring but most of the...
  • ralph nader: Yes it is a referendum on the PAP 1 Year record. I am not a resident from Hougang but the past...
  • news watcher: U dunno the real reason meh. These few days everyone staying home read newspaper and internet...
  • BillyMa: About 950 at desmond choo’s rally. About 650 were there becos they’re told to. 200...
  • What: DPM Teo is the head of civil service. BEfore he calls WP foul, he should exercise a core value of the...
  • ROFL: LOL. the intelligence of TRE readers is astounding. The joke is on you guys.
  • Ain't got boss: Not only terrify, he ain’t got boss to shake.
  • guan ah: PAP cocked this up, the reason is probably the SBS buses allocated to pick up D C supporters broke...
  • NTUC worker: Voters of Hougang make sure to make Papee Desmond lose his deposit and citizens of Hougang,...
  • Is this true?: Is this true story?
Sponsored Advertisement
Donations Received
$6517 USD of $50,000 USD
Site Announcement
Stats wef 7 April 2012

Visitors

  • Last 24 hours: 18,722
  • Last 7 days: 128,226
  • Last 30 days: 853,301
  • Online Now: 5764
Official FaceBook
Advertisement
Enter Google Analytics Code Here