True gender equality benefits men and women
Corinna Lim’s assertion that “Singaporean fathers are not rising to the task of child rearing, and state support for equal parenting roles is not adequate” is an accurate description of the causes of Singapore’s woeful birth-rates.
Singapore has seen an increasing number of women joining the workforce, but gender roles have been persistent, and continues to perpetuate. The acceptance of women into the workforce have not seen a reciprocity of the acceptance of men in equal parenting responsibilities, and the paternalistic power structure continues to dominate because of inadequate national policy to encourage a more equal society.
In the last 30 years, women have entered the workplace in droves. More girls graduate from our universities than boys. However, these changes are asymmetrical. Men have not moved into the domestic sphere at the same rate.
This asymmetry makes child rearing much less attractive for women. The woman who derives satisfaction from her work will not be keen to have any, or many, children if she has to bear the bulk of the childcare burden. In the meantime, her husband does not lose sleep about balancing work and family life.
Traditional gender roles not only deprive men of the opportunity to play an active role in their children’s lives but also create an unbalanced environment where women are discouraged from having more children.
It is telling that you can, for the most part, switch the words around and the situation applies to men just as much as to women. While it may be true that Singaporean men have yet to embrace their parenting responsibility as readily as women do (or are expected to do), for some of us the same factors weigh heavily in our decision to start our own families.
This is especially true in my circle of friends and co-workers. I have decided to give up a job offer that would pay more, but would not allow me to spend the time I want to spend with my newborn child who is due in August. A friend packs his shifts tightly so he can accumulate stretches of off-time in order for him to fly back to his wife and two kids in Thailand. Another co-worker sacrifices every single day of paid leave without complaint in order to spend time with, and take care of, his two-year-old son. I appreciate the expanded maternity leave benefits that my wife gets, but this just reinforces the gender roles that I want done away with conclusively.
The sacrifices for men are just as real as those demanded from women. Even taking into account asymmetrical gender roles that seem ingrained in our society, parenting is just as stressful, and as physically and psychologically draining, for men as it is for women. If anything, the persistence of this asymmetry, and the enforcement of inherent gender roles, make men less likely to admit their difficulties, and result in their stubborn refusal to accept their parental responsibilities, or worse, not want to have children at all.
I’m confident that at least some of us men want changes to help us play the role of fathers more fruitfully, and our efforts to do so can be constructively assisted with fair national policies. I have the flexibility of combining annual leave with off-days so I can spend more time with my family, but for fathers working the typical 9am-to-6pm, 5-days-a-week jobs, that flexibility is out of the question. Don’t even get me started on jobs that require longer hours.
Without adequate employment practices and policies to help fathers get there, our attempts to do so on our own is easily stymied, and gets us nothing but frustration in return for our efforts. It’s not unlike trying to swim against the current with one hand tied behind your back. And some employers would also blindfold you while you’re at it.
So Corinna is absolutely correct when she said Singapore is still a long way from accomplishing true gender equality; true gender equality is more than just adequate rights and protection for women, it is also adequate rights and protection for both men and women. Only when this balance is achieved will we be able to say we have an equal society where both men and women are expected to contribute to society and their families in every way they can, and not just restricted to long obsolete pigeonholes of neatly packaged responsibilities dictated by gender.
One more thing: I may be nit-picking, but I take issue with the statement that husbands do not “lose sleep about balancing work and family life”. As a father-to-be, I lose a lot more sleep than my wife does, and foresee losing even more in the future; and my kid isn’t even born yet!





















http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joxo71T5YfY
Dear, do you had any idea how much it cost to raise a child from a kid to a man with degree
Ideally, the replacement rates is 2 child policy. If possible, those could afford should had 3 child. In reality, most had only 1 child, those that can’t afford rather had none, prefer to had pets
Like or Dislike:
1
0
This article is too generalisedand does not really address “true” gender equality!
I still think that unless woman are also liable for national service as well as reservist duties till age 40, and that the government make amendments to the Woman Charters which is clearly bliased against man, there’ll be no “true” gender equality!
If AWARE, Corinna and Callan Tham is truly concerned about “true” gender equality, they should actively petition Singapore government to make it compulsory for woman to be inducted for NS and reservists duties, as well as campaign for a change to the Womans’ Charter in favor of a fairer terms for both sexes.
Otherwise, please stop selectively talk or write about “true” gender equality!
Like or Dislike:
1
0
I hope her hubby or male partner is practicising what she is preaching.
If she is single or is different, “Shut up and sit down.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
When corrina spoke she spoke for equal rights for women.. whereas you are saying that fathers are not doing enough…. asking the STATE for help in more flexible policies; flexible time to spent at home looking after your child. No STATE can afford to support such a policy.
Try this.. start a business based at home. You can do both. make money doing what you like best and at same time provides the supervisory role at home.. best you leaves the household chores to a helper so you can still run around your business. You will sure to enjoy every min of it.
The STATE does hear you becos their hands are too full.. Self-help is the best and you establish your business while watching your child grow up. In a sense your business grew while your child took baby steps.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
since it is fairly easy to hire maids, “woman who derives satisfaction from her work” would be able to go back to work after maternity leave without having “to bear the bulk of the childcare burden”; the husband/wife burdens seem reasonably equal to me
maybe the article “Graduate Feeling Pessimistic About Her Future” provides a better explanation of the problem
Like or Dislike:
0
0
honestly,it is the guys rather the gals who are facing ‘gender inequality’ AT WORKPLACE in this modern world.
Female workers,especially pretty ones tend to attract the big BOSSES’ attention and as of now,these big bosses still happen to be MALES more often than not!
those who have seen how their bosses favour their lady colleagues over them know what i mean.Further more,it is human nature too to be attracted to beautiful looking people and especially so,from the male’s point of view.So,not surprising to see more and more females excel in sales like in REAL ESTATE and in INSURANCE or financial planning,besides others.This is not o slight our women workforce but just to HIGHLIGHT that this myth of gender inequality is really just a myth in this modern world.
In fact,the common looking ‘AH BENGS’ and ‘ah kows’ are sufferring from more ‘GENDER INEQUALITY’ than the ‘AH CHEOs’ and ‘ah lians”,don;t you all guys out there agree?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
As to why there is such a low birth rate in Singapore, the questions should be “What is the expense per child in modern Singapore?”
The message from Corinna Lim would be more effective if she could address the above question and link the causes directly to how “Singaporean fathers are not rising to the task of child rearing, and state support for equal parenting roles is not adequate”
Way I see it, fathers in Singapore have already risen to the occasion time and time again. We see this in the many days growing up as kids ourselves; almost never seeing our fathers in the daytime, only to spend fleeting minutes with him after he comes home before being whisked away at bedtime. Fathers provided and children lived another day with food on the table and a roof over their heads.
Can modern day families afford lifestyles of today on a single spouse income any more? Expenses from they day a child is born (basic medical fees, speciality paediatrics, diapers, baby food…) and throughout the child’s development (school fees, tuition fees, CCA expenses, extracurricular class expenses, holiday expenses, entertainment expenses, more miscellaneous expenses.) And even if we were to have more stay home dads, soon enough they will be forced to re-enter the workforce simply because the income of a single spouse cannot meet the financial demands of raising a child in this day and age.
How ironic. In this day and age, couples either can’t afford to have kids or they can’t afford the time to have kids…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Any stance (beleif) that reinforces gender is divisive and till that is transcended one can go on whining, complaining, crowing, espousing … and nothing is ever going to really be seen as equitable.
When one can see the other as a human being then who needs Aware or what have you. Perhaps we are still evolving or still split on the inside!
Self-serving and the will to power is the reality lah!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Damn bloody bullshit, Men and Women can never ever be egual. To those SG gals that think that they support equal standing with the genders go fuck yourselves…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
For gender equality, we should also look into Woman’s charter, and how it is applied in our courts.
Before the last election, I remember Prime Minister LHL mentioned about reviewing the charter. Nothing heard after election. Ho Ching must have pulled his ear.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Why compare apple and orange which have different taste? We should first compare good apple and bad apple first.
Do you see a beauty pageant competition for transsexual against natural born female? Or why not reduce all Olympic games to open category and mix all games competition?
Why not English soccer game have female goal keeper?
The comparison is against nature. Try to mutate all DNA and form single sex before starting this kind of debate.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Since NS is already an issue of inequality for guys, let me elaborate further… When we say maternal leave for female singaporean is detrimental to her career, Corinna Lim failed to mentioned that guys are required to spend some 30 days per year of their career until all the ICTs are completed. Note that all these ICTs plus 2~2.5 years of national service during their productive years can be induce a significant impact in their careers too. (I was tempted to compare this to the time equivalent to the duration of maternity leave need to raise two child, but I realised it is more complicated than that)
Now she suggested that guys should be given more paternal leave in order to share the responsiblities of child raising. This may seemed like a great suggestion, however I feel that it is a “dead weight” thrown into the guys’ court. What better way to save a sinking ship by dragging another ship down, in reality both ships will sink together. Is this the equality we are seeking for?
http://www.temasekreview.com/2010/05/27/is-goh-keng-swee-truly-the-hero-of-singapore%e2%80%99s-success/
Like or Dislike:
0
0