Opposition parties invited to PKMS’s ‘Unity’ event
February 27th, 2011 | 
Author: 
The Singapore Malay National Organization (PKMS) has extended an invitation to all opposition parties to attend its “Unity” event which will be held on 5th March 2011 @ 1500 hours at PKMS building.
In an email reply to queries from the Temasek Review (TR), Mr Mohd Nazem bin Suki the Secretary-General said that it is the tradition from past election to meet up with representatives from opposition parties to discuss the strategies applicable and any issues which may arise in the coming General Election (GE).
Of importance would be the need to avoid three-cornered fights which without doubt, would deplete the opposition’s resources.
The previous time the electorate witnessed a multi-party contest was in the 1997 GE and signs so far indicate that such a scenario could be on the cards in the coming GE.
The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) and the Socialist Front (SF) had staked fresh claims on the new Whampoa Single-Member Constituency (SMC), while the former is also targeting Yuhua SMC, which the Reform Party (RP) is eyeing.
Punggol East and Radin Mas were reportedly two other new SMCs where there could potentially be three-cornered fights – in addition to established GRCs such as Tampines and Jurong.
It is learnt that SDP, SF, NSP, SDA and WP have confirmed attendance while SPP and RP are pending.
.
Pamela
Posted in Editorial
Stay together to win the battle.
The People has one enemy. It is now or never.
And dear fellow Singaporeans….
Before we are washed out by the Elites and FTs.
Before our olds are dying.
Before our sons become beggars.
Before our daughters have to sell their bodies.
DO NOT BETRAY OUR ANCESTORS WHO FOUGHT THIS LAND FOR YOU WITH THEIR LIFES. SINGAPORE DO NOT BELONG TO ONE FAMILY.
Like or Dislike:
28 
0
Well done !
Like or Dislike:
13 
0
why no party context tanjong pagar grc. i am starving here.
Like or Dislike:
11 
0
“In an email addressed to the Temasek Review (TR), Mr Mohd Nazem bin Suki the Secretary-General said that it is the tradition from past election to meet up with representatives from opposition parties to discuss the strategies applicable and any issues which may arise.”
If anything in Singapore’s GE were to keep up with traditions, it will be the “easy victory for the incumbent”! This good tradition haven’t change since 1968! LOL
Like or Dislike:
4 
8
SINGAPOREANS MUST LEARN TO UNITE just like those sectoral FTs are ‘enclaved’.
look at how singaporean managers ‘KICK OUT’ their own colleagues.
see how this contrasts with the INDIAN FT prmoted to manager after he kicks out that singaporean manager – the indian ft-made manager now RECUITS ALL HIS VILLAGERS despite there are better singaporean candidates.
how ‘daft’ do we intend to aspire to even if SM LKY ascribe us so?
Like or Dislike:
9 
0
Last nite received a call from an old friend who had migrated overseas. She said she was shocked to hear that all her dozen or so Singaporean cousins are now very much against the PAP. They were once strong supporters of the PAP. They have made up their minds to vote for any opposition this time. They are so sick and tired of being pushed around with policies that do not benefit them. They felt they are being cheated. They say should the PAP win, they will be making serious plans to migrate elsewhere. Told her that generally people here are now disillusioned with the government who have lost touch with the people.
Like or Dislike:
9 
0
MSM will use dirty tactics to defame All Oppositions this GE.
TR/ Netizens let’s do the same and DIG SOME SHITS OF PAP CANDIDATES to counter MSM in TR and other social political blogs.
Like or Dislike:
5 
0
I think its the strategy of the ruling party to divert the opposition into targeting the SMC while most GRC’s are uncontested for.
Which will make them the majority again.
This i think is the stratergy taken as they find the mass of singaporeans not happy with their policies in recent times which has greatly disadvatnaged us Singaporeans.
So long story short if they cant avoid the opposition in parliament then it is abvious they want to minimise the number of them in Parliament.
Like or Dislike:
5 
0
Together get rid of pap once and for all.
Like or Dislike:
5 
0
The dirty PAP use ISD, GRC, electorial boundaries, kangaroo judicary to snap power from the people.
Now the PAP is using thier moles to disrupt opposition unity and cast doubt of opposition candidates crediability.
Beware of the PAP moles, they want strike a last minutes surprise to enable the PAP to once again immorally grap power from the people.
Like or Dislike:
5 
0
Dear leaders of the opposition parties,
I would like to offer the following thoughts and points for your consideration as you begin to plan mapping out your candidates to the various constituencies in the upcoming general election.
A lot of what I am saying below is common sense, and I am sure you would have thought about them. I am hoping that this will bring out other good thoughts and suggestions/reflections which hopefully will be useful as you go through the exercise.
I am sure we all want to see a united picture and good co-operation from the opposition parties in this very crucial election, to see the dawn of a new era and significant changes. 50 years of nonsense has been far too long already. Time for a big change.
I believe there are a few key principles and objectives you want to remember/follow as you work out the allocation. The key objective is to maximize the strength of opposition, and hence achieve the best electoral results for the opposition as a group( and individual parties).
The following should be achieved where possible:
1. avoid the internal fights(like 3-cornered flights) and split the opposition votes. To the extent that there are known independents who might come to any of the constituencies, you should approach them and get them to join you. Be prepared for the cronies used by PAP as “independents” to divide up the votes for opposition. They have money and will resort to all the dirty tricks and tactics. This election is no-win for them, so they will pull all the stops.
2. Fill candidates in all SMCs: this arethe easy ones and there should not be any walkovers in these sSMCs. Psychologically this will create a backlash in the people it this were to happen.
3. Maximize the strength of opposition parties:
a. let the parties who are the incumbents contest the two seats they are now holding.
b. let the parties who have contested in the previous GRC/SMC go back to those areas—this is to capitalize on their strengths and minimize the effort to rebuild the support for a new party.
c. Avoid the government walk over with enough seats to form the government on the nomination day: this should not happen , as psychologically this will turn the opposition supporters off and reduce their turnout on election day.To this end, it is all the more important for the opposition to join hands, form groups to go into certain GRCS where possible(in so doing, remember to tap on the strengths of the constituent parties).
Sun Zi Strategy says you have to attack the opponent at its weakest point. I am sure you would have a least of GRCs with ranking according to their ranks and your chances of making the breakthroughs. While this would be subjective,this should be used to the fullest extent possible. There are some weak ministers you would have to go after, like Mah Bow Tan(HDB and housing issue), Vivien (overexpenditure in YOG), Ibrahim (his weakness in dealing the hard truth controversy), Lee Bee Wah( fiasco in table tennis association), and the Minister involved in the Mas Selamat Fiasco, Lim HNG Kiang( lack of results in resolving old age Security issue, etc.
I can support that LHL should not be left unchallenged(also given the impressive results last round).
If you can, you should not let the old man have a easy time, let him work and drive him nuts. He may say something really stupid and help you—even the cooling off day wont save PAP.
Look at the old constituencies where the opposition have had success and done well(e.g. Dr Chia Thye Poh,who was the MP under Barisan Sosialis in the Jurong constituency then– during the early 1960s and was detained under ISD for 23 years without trial followed by 9 years of house arrest). While people has changed and moved on, there are still older folks around who remember history—don’t discount this factor.
Do not play into the strength of PAP. If man power is an issue, avoid ministers who have track record—like the finance minister who is now giving away election goodies(I know this is subjective but is a factor you need to consider).
PAP has huge war chest given the friends in the business world(Those with BPM, what I called the cap for bottled soft drinks) and connection/vested interest in the continuation of this regime , their huge salaries, and their years in power, not to mention the compliant media.
So you would have to be prepared financially. Start a fresh round of fund raising asap!
At the end of all this, there will be some give and take. I sincerely hope that in the interest of Singaporeans, you folks can forge a strong alliance and go against this formidable and cruel force. They will be at the end of the election. I think LHL /old man/ Goh(who?) will not be stupid enough to do anything before the final vote.
I wish you all the luck and good discussion and work out on the very important exercise for the future of Singapore—What you will achieve will go into the history book for Singapore, and future generations of Singaporeans will thank you for this!!!
Like or Dislike:
12 
0
Say there’s a 3 corner contest, (eg only) PAP, WP, RP.
PAP – 36%
WP – 32%
RP – 32%
Does that mean PAP wins even there there was a 64% vote against them and only 36% for?
Like or Dislike:
5 
0
Would any of the opposition leaders challenge the Pinky prince to a live telecast debate? American TV style.Party leader against party leader.
If he does accept; he will be seen as the coward that he is.
If he accept, his lack of leadership and debating skill will be exposed once and for all.You have nothing to lose.KJ? Dr. Chee?
Like or Dislike:
8 
0
If this negotiation by some Party to over stomach more seat, Which they are not able to represent more candidate to contest. At the end during the Nomination day, resulting in the number of uncontested constituency, which is very detrimental to the other opposition losses. This is a likely scenario, because one or two Party may B too greedy, resulting in other Party ,who have genuine candidate being left out, Because of this un-principle Party to reserve more then what they can stomach.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Great Job by PKMS and certainly this is good for all Singaporeans whom have a chance to cast their vote for long times.
Please SPP and RP should response to PKMS call sooner. Any three corner fights will be a waste of all opposition’s resources, voter’s chance and not to mention that whole world is watching us in Singapore.
God Bless all good peoples!
Like or Dislike:
7 
0
Dear Opposition Parties & Singaporeans,
Please remember how LKY_PAP has broken many of it own rules and laws. And since that GE 2011 goodies will be distributed on May 1 which is Labour Day. it’ll most appropriate to be emember that PAP government does have a 44 hours work week law.
And that for years now, many bargainable or unionized Singaporeans and foreigners here have been working 12 hour days for 6 days a week. That’s 12 x 6 = 72 hours a week. And it breaches the 44 hours by 28 hours. As if that’s not enough. the majority of don’t even get paid overtime for the extra 28 hours of work! Worse is they don’t get medical benefits too nor paid leave. Fall sick and for 1 day off on Certified Sick Leave and their boss will ALSO deduct 2 day’s pay!
Yet NTUC Labour Chief Lim Swee Say CHAMPIONS NO Minimum Wage! WHY???????????????????????????????????????
Labour Chief indeed????????????????????????????????????????
Like or Dislike:
21 
0
RDB:U’re right-Many people don’t know about this!!Our clock has been shifted to half hours earlier plus the work they work for 72hours a weeks,has cause very stressful for everyone here.Adult in working class & School Children racing agaist time in dawn hours. They still don’t know.Blur-Blur-Blur. PAP created this.
Like or Dislike:
15 
0
Wise words:
The Jakarta Post
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Page 2
SBY warns against setting up casino in Bintan
………………..He is also scheduled to inaugurate
the new Treasure Bay holiday resort Lagoi, Bintan
on Saturday. ……….President Yudhoyono reminded the Riau Islands administration to not legalize gambling projects in Bintan, saying it would damage the social unity as many would object to the presence of gambling sites.
” I remind you to not establish a gambling project here. There are many other businesses blessed by God that we can run in Bintan”
How true. That’s leadership at it’s best.
Not like our money-mad crazy rulers who does not care at all about the repercussions and social impact. Serious problems are cropping up one after another. Despite the strong objections by so many groups and individuals, they didnt care a damn and proceeded set up those evil joints, two at one go. They ignored all advices. Any nation can built a casino. But the wiser ones are more careful. For a small country it is suicidal to endorse and encourage gambling. Use your common sense. They have failed miserably.
They must be voted out.
Like or Dislike: 0 0
by Stubborn and greedy on Feb 28, 2011 at 8:35 pm (Quote)
Like or Dislike: 0 0
by They don’t listen to you. Vote them out. on Feb 28, 2011 at 8:54 pm (Quote)
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
Unfortunately the answer is YES! Exactly why the opposition must avoid a 3-corner fight.
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
Great Job by PKMS:
I think PKMS are truly sincere and open to discusion and unity.
To all Opposition
The future of Singapore regardless of all race and religion will now depend very much on the Opposition.
Fight a one and defeat the Lee Dynasty and PAP
We have enough of slavery in a first class country.
Like or Dislike:
5 
0
Come come NSP. Come To Jurong GRC. Finally you all have confirmed coming to Jurong. Can’t wait to vote for you. My vote is definitely yours.
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
Here’s how to avoid 3-cornered fight:
Negotiate. If negotiations fail, mediate using a mediator.
Really the opposition party who has worked the ground hardest and longest should prevail over the other opposition party which has not put in as much time and resources, and be the one who stands whilst the other withdraws.
Part of the deal between the 2 could be something along the lines that if the prevailing party can only muster less than 30% of the actually vote in the 2011 GE, then come the following GE (2016?), that party which lost the contest must voluntarily give way in that constituency to the other opposition party and not contest that seat again in the 2016 GE nor in the 2021 GE. But if the prevailing party gets 30% or more, it can keep trying there though it must give way in one other constituency in the subsequent GE: perhaps in the one that it has done most poorly, so the party which did not prevail at least has that consolation for withdrawing.
Like or Dislike:
0 
2
If there were some form of Proportional Representation system, then there is no need to avoid a 3-cornered fight.
In reality there should be a 3-cornered fight since each party has a different outlook.
If e.g. there is a constitutional change favouring PR system, there could be a 5-member GRC and if the vote is 36-32-32 as in the example given, then probably the result might be something like 3 seats PAP, 1 seat WP, 1 seat RP, rather than winner takes all. Even if that return is not exact, it is far better than the current first past the post winner takes all system. Is that not fairer? If we must have Malay candidates then we should have a list system where either the first or second name on each party list must be a Malay. If that is the case, then 100% sure that one of the 5 MPs will be a Malay; probably the parties will put a Malay as No.2 on its list (but no stopping if they want to put as No. 1). If all put Malays as No.1, there could even be 3 Malay MPs (of different parties) returned. We might even have an addiitonal rule that if No.1 is a Malay, No. 2 or 3 on the list must be a woman; and if No. 2 is a Malay, No. 1 or No. 3 on the list must be a woman.
Really, the point in NOT lack of Malay representation. The point is lack of opposition representation when in each GE, about 30-40% vote opposition and the numbers returned to Parliament under the FPTP system don’t reflect that. PAP attempted to solve that by having NCMP. This is laughable. There should be 20+ opposition MPs under a PR system and not one NCMP.
Like or Dislike:
1 
2
If this is true, then Opposition please work out something. I’ve seen a “GE 2011 Battle lines” jpg on facebook and it shows some over contested wards (Moulmein-Kallang for example) which only favors the PAP. They’ve got the Main Stream Media and a lot of brainwashed people on their side.
Like or Dislike:
13 
0
For this coming General Electon
We want to see More oppositions taking up the seat in Parliament.
If Oppositions want to go into 3corner fight then it is disaster.We are already shortage of candidates to stand for opposition to represent us Singapore in all the seat and yet wasting human resources in 3 corner fight ?
Please set priorities right. Get into Parliament first. You can fight in 2016.
NB :If ever in my constituency happens to be a 3 corner fight.
My family vote goes to PAP…..Period.
Like or Dislike:
1 
2
But first PKMS must have it’s own internal “unity” event?
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1002621/1/.html
http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_563434.html
Like or Dislike:
0 
2
Poem from the PKMS website:
http://www.pkms.org/
At least as they say, recognition that there is a problem is the first step towards recovery.
What I personally find funny is that the PKMS are the ones who are preaching unity in this case.
http://sgforums.com/forums/3317/topics/374284?page=1
UNITY
O’Muslim Let’s Unite!
We argue and we fight, When we are supposed to unite, So many disputes amongst us, Instead of peace, we make a fuss.
So many different reasons we have found, For us to break the bonds of brotherhood, Our unity has been pushed underground, For we don’t treat each other as we should.
We all have the same belief, yet somehow we still bring each other down, can’t we see that unity will bring relief, if only all our differences we can drown.
Allah has willed for us to be one entity, Standing together, with unrivalled unity, Yet we choose to ignore this, as we succumb to outside pressures, our unity goes amiss.
Of a strong brotherhood there is no trace, so many different groups in one small place, and weaker we become each day, because together we cannot stay.
Unity is the only answer, One brotherhood, stronger than them all, Only then will we not fall, the courage to unite, we have to muster!
O’Muslims, let’s unite, Striving together to do what’s right, O’Muslim, let’s not wait, For it might just be too late.
Like or Dislike:
1 
2
you were refering to the past. Waaaay past the period of anarchy in PKMS. I attended the PKMS 50 anniversary, it is united. So please do get the facts. I am being a non malay, impressed by them and at current stage, they are leading.
Like or Dislike:
5 
0
So please get the latest updates from the PKMS, not from hearsay or the historical facts especially refering to media reports that many deem classified as facts. The facts are, what I gather from many previous news, it was manipulated. Once I was with the media, and i know what is media sensationalisation. Upon my personal visits and freindship for past 5mth, the reality is hardly or none what was described by the people who is outside pkms. I wonder, if only I was a malay, i would have been an active member. Dear freinds, experince it before judgement, as far it is projected, the facts doenst come from media report, it could be half truths. Get the facts from the reality nor reading or hearsay. Maybe you may read the ISLAM section of their website. It is about slander of fitnah. I had my muslim freinds to explain to me. It is beyond and so far the best to explain to the outside world.
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
pkms unity call to all party player is timely. nothing special about it, but because it was called by a malay organization, many perceptions evolve. what happen if it was called by the PAP? same thing will surface of negative perceptions. Do not distinct one race to another, unity is humanity. Even a chinese or indians or other races are eligible to participate in unity. What is wrong with the call by the malay to unite evry singaporean? Prejudise and bias towards anybody is never correct, until proven by facts.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
@hard reality A political event that happened just over a year ago (sep 09) is waaaay past? Over financial improprieties, amongst others? I am puzzled by this statement. The case was only heard in court just under 4 mths ago (Oct 2010) and the defendants were cited as having been ousted by the current leadership. As at Dec last year (2 mths ago) there were still 2 camps fighting for control of the party.
http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?t=54379
Get your facts right lah bro.
Like or Dislike:
0 
2
Your facts was history… So many of us were correct. I assume you are a Malay by race, shame on you. You are those who trigger Malay disunity, your facts were from hearsay, even it was correct in time, it was never correct in the whole storyline. Nothing was what you have mentioned and you deem to be facts. So that is why I said, get the real facts, not the fitnah or hearsay.
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
Nevertherless, the stereotype judgement and prejudise of PKMS will live on. I affirm your position to be the Malay betrayer, just what I know of some Chinese betrayer so to say. We live and move on, a united humanity is tough, with the person like you who do not preach it but judge it, so to say how perfect you are. Why dont you improve it, instead of condeming it? Words are empty, action speaks alot. So bro, we I rest my case against those who speak cleverly empty except full of perfection just in their dreams. I am just ashame of a unity call to questioned out of context. It shows how you have been disillusioned by the unrealiTY AND SADIST THOAGHT.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
You all come all so strong about the Opposition Parties contesting in all wards with no 3-cornered fights too.
HEY guys! ARE YOU SERIOUS??? IT TAKE AT LEAST A MILLION DOLLARS YOU KNOW RIGHT!!!??? As NO one ABSOLUTELY NONE has responded just to second me DONATE TO SUPPORT them FINANCIALLY!!! WHY? Have I been asking for you to individually to declare you are donating and perhaps in your mindsets the amount too!!!
If we the majority are not able for personal reason to even give physical support to the oppostion, can’t we at least lend encouragments to my way of calls here for financial supports?
ARE YOU SERIOUS or just keyboard warriars??? Anyone now will respiond to my renewed and many previous calls? Or are you still feeding LKY-PAP egos that we ARE weak and truly uselss dafts as LKY called us all???
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Dear “Elections here”,
There will be a real 3-corner fight at Joo Chiat.
If the independent candidate wins, it means the 2 political parties’ votes are split. Voters who may not want to give their votes to PAP as well as WP may end up voting for the 3rd person.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Come to AMK again please….a 2 corner fight is enough for me and my family to vote.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
I will vote for any opposition parties who wants to contest AMK GRC. I think if Chiam See Tong or some opposition big wig come to AMK GRC and manage to unseat LHL, that will be headline news and make political history in Singapore…
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
Any GRCs, and any SMc, all opposition need to deny the PAP. The only competitor is the PAP. So go with the inter party conference, deny the PAP the majority!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
(Rhetorical question here) How come till today we don’t have a weightage system for elections?
Eg. If 3 way contest, we check a 1st and 2nd choice. If 4 ways, 1st, 2nd and 3rd choice.
Assign 3 points for 1st choice, 2 points for 2nd and 1 points for 3rd. Do a tally at the end. The party that gathered the most points wins the ward.
That’ll avoid situations where a party wins even with most voted against them like this.
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
Price of cigarette, food & drink has increased again. Siow liao la.. Budget money havent take yet..
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I never for a moment doubt the united opposition parties can change the lives of Singaporean. Indeed, it is the thing that ever will. What else could possibly cause that change otherwise?
Unity is strength, great virtues of governance are pure and universal: freedom, justice, duty, mercy, honesty and hope, for the people and for the system we want our children and grand children to have. Mind you, if we can succeed in doing that, it will be better than leaving them many more Temasek Corporation!
A government who does not respect these virtues is living in a world of its own at the expense of its people. Relentless pursuit of profits for the State seems to be the thing that matters most in the way our government formulate their economic policies.
A country or a society cannot be governed by the principle of more and more money being channelled to and controlled by the government. It is against free market principle and that is why we do not have home grown industries and brand name products like they have in South Korea and Taiwan. What home grown entrepreneurs do we expect when our economic system and fiscal policies are designed to prevent us from being able to hold on to too much cash? Let alone any genuine attempt at enterprising, it is suicidal for an individual to start out in an environment of unlevel playing field.
One of our greatest bankers has said many years ago, much to the annoyance of our ruling establishment, that our economic policies and structure would result in a situation where if one were to survive in the private business environment in Singapore, one has to be either very, very big or very, very small. That situation has arrived.
I like to quote some famous phrases said by some very famous people, to me these are words of wisdom:
No man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent.
The love of liberty is the love for others. The love of power is the love for ourselves.
He who is of the opinion money will do everything may well be suspected of doing everything for money.
To sit back hoping that someday, someway, someone will make things right is to go on feeding the crocodile hoping he will not eat you, or at least eat you last – BUT EAT YOU HE WILL !
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
Elections here:
February 28, 2011 at 2:48 pm Elections here(Quote)
Say there’s a 3 corner contest, (eg only) PAP, WP, RP.
PAP – 36%
WP – 32%
RP – 32%
Of course the PAP wins.
You can go around the world and ask anyone you meet on this.
If not who wins ? WP wins ? RP wins ? or nobody wins ?
Then how many election we need to take ? 1 or 2 or 3 or …endless ?
You not agree PAP wins because you are biased to sum up the 2 WP and RP votes. Or you need to make them to work out to have only 1 candidate out of WP and RP to have one on one fight with PAP.
Are you primary school educated ?
Like or Dislike:
0 
4
If the opposition parties cannot come to an agreement to avoid three corner fights, then the public would have no sympathy for them because of the selfishness, and we hope that in such a suicidal fiasco they would all lose their deposit.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Are you retarded, oxygen deprived or just plain stupid?
In the example, it’s not tallying the number of people who voted for WP and RP, it’s counting the number of people who voted AGAINST the PAP.
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
Hey dumb ass. When you can only count to 10 don’t think people who can count to billions are dumber than you just cause you can’t understand them.
Ask anyone in the world your lampah! There are fairer election tallying systems out there that your pea brain isn’t aware of.
Instant Run-Off Voting for one. You vote for as many candidates as you want listing them in preferential order. The 1st choices are tallied and if no party has an outright majority of 51% (some countries set it at higher levels) at least, then the 2nd choices are also tallied, then the 3rd if need be.
This way you get a better represented candidate than one who in reality more people voted against than for “winning”.
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
See “Instant Run-off Voting”.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
so workers’ party contesting AMK again right? just sent a bunch of newbies again. doesnt matter lose, but i’ll bet lhl will get lesser than the 66.1% he gt the last time round. though a ltk-sylvia-eric-rahizan combo will be mouth watering to kick lhl n his supporting acts out.
SDP really gonna give sembawang a miss? we all know SDP screwed up badly last GE. but this time is different. there’s a growing unhappiness with PAP n SDP’s image has improve. the irrational tantrums throwing antics has greatly lessened. ppl r more willing to take sdp seriously.
Which is the constituency that reputedly has 5 parties eyeing it? if its a grc, then each party send 1 rep lor.
Why is RP not sending a team to tanjong pagar? c’mon now KJ. You’ve got a stack of applications with with! not one. not two. A STACK! more than the number of ppl that walked out, isnt tt what he claims?
SJP used to love contesting Marine parade, SDA not interested to send a team there?
NSP is probably the most centrist of all the parties but is walking a dangerously on a this rope with the malay bureau they formed. they risked playing the race cards so i hope NSP will take extra care with the issues they’re going to raise.
SF too new, too small. is SF joining SDA? DPP sent a representative but what else do we know abt DPP? Maybe TR might want to write a line or two so we know something abt DPP. And USD, what is it’s purpose?
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
What it so difficult? It all voice down if all the oppo want to unite or not? Or to have selfish agenda??
As easy as internal voting.
Example: if 3 oppo like the same place.
Just get this 3 oppo to cast a vote each.
They cannot vote their own party, can only vote which of the other 2 parties got the highest chance to win.
The party that gets 2 votes shall emerge!!!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Dr John is a true genuine blue-blooded aborigine Malaysian. Not Hindu Indian or Chinese but a Dayak. A native of Sarawak (East malaysian).
He says it all in his blog about the phony 1Malaysia slogan under Muslim majority Malaysia where legislated and government instituted racism is the order of the day.
Check this out -
http://dayakbaru.com/weblog08/2009/11/03/racial-discrimination-in-malaysia-what-1-malaysia/
Like or Dislike:
1 
0