The GRC Scheme is not according to democractic principles
June 28th, 2011 | 
Author: 
It is a gross distortion to assist newer MPs or less popular ones to come under the umbrella of a Minister.
Singapore’s system of Government is modelled on the British system – the Westminster.
The GRC scheme is begining to show cracks with the victory of the WP in Aljunied – with Marine Parade GRC, Bishan-Toa Payoh and Tampines to fall successively in the next GE.
The MPs did not heed the writing on the wall during the 2006 Ge where the WP secured a significant percentage of voter patronage under the old Team. It was the consensus of the WP to present a more credible Team rthis time around that swept the PAP MPs (some Ministers and Minister-to-be from their ‘thrones’.
Tan Chuan JIn and Tin Pei Ling should be channeled as a compensatory gesture to the country’s other businesses like Temasek, GIC, etc.
There’s nuch talk about Tan Chuan Jin delineating Eunos under his command to fellow MP – Assoc. Prof Fatimah Lateef.
Truly, truly, a Code of conduct and Governance should be implemented for MPs as a compass to guiode them in issues.
There is no fool-proof ’scanner’ to check on their backgrounds fully.
PAP MPs should present a monthly report to their Anchor MPs and SMCs to the Party Chairman or PM. Only then can the PM be better informed of the performance and work of his MPs regularly – instead of making them to stand-down after 2 terms where they can do it after the 1st term.
This is essentially necessary for the PAP leadership to be constantly updates and not get caught with their ‘pants down’ e.g. in the case of former MP for Marine Parade Dr.Ong who had irked a sizeable number of Eunos residents with his snide and cutting remarks during the MPS sessions and did not touch-base with his Eunos residents – in particular. In November 2010 when Dr Ong made a series of Block visits with his successor, many Residents refused to welcome him and his delegation.
Now he gets to enjoy the MP pension for eternity ( I stand corrected) for eternity.
Tan Chuan Jin was quick to analyse his support base after the recent GE when apartment blocks come under different polling centres. Besides, most of them were Malay voters and a big sum came after the en-block scheme in Geylang Serai who were resettled in Eunos.
Within a month, he sent out an open letter to Eunos residents informing them about the change in internal boundaries – a copy of which I will gladly give to Nicole Seah and all Opposition members to use it as an issue for the next GE. Put clearly, Tin Pei Ling and Tan Chuan Jin should be replaced in the next GE – or risk losing more crucial votes in Marine Parade GRC even to the point of losing the entire GRC just as Aljunied.
The wave of change is rapidly sweeping MPs in their ‘comfort zones’ – the GRC.
If the WP enlists Nicole Seah to be fielded in Marine parade GRC – they will win decisively. This is the reality of a failed GRC scheme when involving picked-up politicians with lack-lustre performance.
ESM should take this opportunity to train and guise MPs under his command before it is too late and risk losing his dignity as 2PM by losing the GRC to the WP.
ESM Goh as Team leader should have monitored his MPs like Dr. Ong on their performance before letting him to serve 2 terms and come out with a new Team.
The PAP should do more introspection to value advice given by their stalwart Volunteers and grassroots. Tan Chuan Jin did not consult his constituents and residents when he decided to ‘farm-out’ Eunos from his command. This strategy was done military-style and should raise concerns about his performance when he continues to take a higher profile.
Dear other Comrades of the PAP, take the learning opportunities to improve and be more resilient in your term of office. at the opening of the new Parliament around September, please prepare yourselves to face 9 opposing voices who will works towards mileage with the people. You have adequate time to prepare to ‘face-off’.
Tan Chuan Jin and Tin Pei ling – prepare to work even harder as the 9 Opposition Mps are all geared-up for their ‘mother of all battles’.
Pm Lee should aggressively cajole and induct more people from the commercial world and the grassroots. PM Lee is doing his extreme best for Singapore. Let us support him as he works tirelessly for the greater good of Singapore.
.
Parliamentary Democracy
Posted in 
Of course, it is not! Are you dreaming? SG was never a democracy in the first place, never will, until perhaps the demise of the senile old man. Then we may see some people power in action. Else, it will never happen because the citizens are daft and emasculated!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
114 
4
the title does not make sense, like incomplete sentence.
Like or Dislike:
32 
14
Are these things are done without the knowledge of the people do? Is there respect for human rights where people’s rights?
Like or Dislike:
58 
1
Are these things are done without the knowledge of the people do? Is there respect for human rights where people’s rights?
http://www.dhgate.com/wholesale+mens+clothing.html
Like or Dislike:
54 
1
There are definitely more, other than these 2 PAP MPs, that should not even stand for election at all.
Majority of these PAP MPs came in for many good reasons & to serve the people is clearly not one of them.
We really don’t need more evidence to know their real characters.
We just need to listen to a few of their speeches & comments & you’ll get the full picture.
Anyway, it’ll be these PAP-anointed MPs that will bring about the downfall of the regime… eventually.
Like or Dislike:
57 
2
We need more Aljunieds in order to abolish GRCs.
Like or Dislike:
51 
2
“. PM Lee is doing his extreme best for Singapore. Let us support him as he works tirelessly for the greater good of Singapore.”
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Haaah???!??! Brother you ok onot?? He is the highest paid person in the world! He should be supporting us instead dont you think?!?!? There are lots of homeless ppl waaaay before GE. Still no change for those ppl. Brother you O effin K OR NOT?!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Like or Dislike:
55 
2
@Parliamentary Democracy
Who says that Singapore is democratic? It never was and never has been.
The GRC scheme is another attempt by the PAP to perpetuate their stay in office. The scheme has nothing to do with democracy.
Please look at our National Pledge. The Pledge that S Rajaratanam thought of is just a figment of his imagination. The reality is that Lee Kuan Yew had other ideas. LKY just wanted to build a nation “to achieve happiness, prosperity and progress”. He did not want to “build a democratic society based on justice and equality”.
Look at the catalogue of things that LKY did after sINGAPORE became independent – ISA, NPPA; Legal Professions Act, GRC, Elected president etc. Do any of these have any democratic connotations?
Justice and equality – they are even more remote. LKY appoints his people to the judiciary and with the elitist policies how do we get equality?
NO DEMOCRACY TO TALK ABOUT IN SINGAPORE IN THE FIRST PLACE!
Like or Dislike:
63 
2
GRC was used as a dirty tactic bt the PAP to thwart any attempt by the Alternative Parties to make inroads in GE. Cheng San GRC would have been lost by the PAP if not for the rigging. The loss of Aljunied GRC was the best thing to happen. The PAP can no longer depend on the GRC to ensure victory.
PS: Pinky must abolish the failed GRC scheme which has made the PAP the laughing stock of the world.
Like or Dislike:
38 
2
please stop thinking pap as naive and unaware of things happening around them. in fact, pap knows from top down, and thus, plan, execute, manipulate according to times of change or requirements, in ensuring power holding will not be eroded in whatsoevermanner.
in short, believe still lky is behind everything, and he is master of political genius, in which no one in the world politics could even imagine coming with many form of political tactics prior to staying on power throughout.
fine examples are introduction of grc system, whereby even real monkeys or donkeys could be guaranteed a win with a single heavyweight minister in charge. introduction of pension scheme for ex-ministers and MPs, making politics as a career, rather than being known as elected. a first in the world in fact. bulldozing of policies without much debates. inciting fear tactics to all citizens using isa. elected president seems to be always ex-pap guys, rather than truly being an independent candidates without imposing much criterias, and so on.
Therefore, in summary, as long as MM is alive, no one can turn any stones except lky. this is the fact and faith of singapore, and we shall all agree.
Like or Dislike:
26 
13
Yes its undemocratic but oppo can beat them at their own game. Now its turning to become advantage if oppo can field good candidates. PAP scared the shit out because they will lose big in 2016.
Like or Dislike:
33 
1
Yes support PM Lee before all of us are doomed. The system must not changed at all. It is a GOOD stable sytem that has served Singapore very well. Everyone in the PAP can work together. We must not rock the very foundation of Singapore. Keep this system for many years to come and we will be Rich and happy. Singapore is already a 1st world A class democracy. We don’t need 3rd world opposition bullshits here. What opposition? They are bunch of sore loser. With no plans at all. Just want to cause mayhem in Singapore. Don’t listen to their bullshitting. Full of lies. Only the PAP can run Singapore well and they have been doing that. keep supporting for the PAP and we will have many good years to come.
Like or Dislike:
5 
76
The above writer is speaking through his/her ass hole.
GRC is a cheating system by LKY to “chope” all the lawmakers seats in Parliament since 1988, when he sensed from the 1984 election that PAP may lose in the next election.
If you said Singapore follows the UK’s Westminister System, then ONE PERSON STAND IN CONTEST IN ONE WARD IS BEST AND FAIR.
And one man had one vote to vote for one MP lawmaker.
Example : LKY stands in Tanjong Pagah and JB Jeyaratham stands in Anson, with Chiam See Tong stands in Potong Pasir, while Low TK stands in Huaugkang. THIS IS THE SMC SYSTEM of the UK’s Westminister systems.
Now with the GRC system, those “good for nothing” MPs just walked in through the bak door. They have NO ABILITY to be MP.
Too many ex-BGs in the Parliament….all YES MAN !!!
When LKY die shortly of “KURU DISEASE” , Pink Pussycat is done !!!
Like or Dislike:
43 
3
1) Why shall ESM train them, he himself kanna drag out of his pay & comfort zone by ‘you know who’
2) Opposition MP will not waste any bullets/arti on TPL. In battle, you shoot your enemy (human) and not dogs or ants that are at his side.
Like or Dislike:
21 
0
http://bbs.sgchinese.net/thread-4453383-1-1.html
Like or Dislike:
0 
4
GRC – NOT IN LINE WITH DEMOCRACY?
MUCH MORE! IT IS OUT OF LINE WITH the PAP’s MERITOCRACY philosophy???
Like or Dislike:
10 
0
“Tan Chuan Jin was quick to analyse his support base after the recent GE when apartment blocks come under different polling centres. Besides, most of them were Malay voters and a big sum came after the en-block scheme in Geylang Serai who were RESETTLED in Eunos.”
A lesson to any aspiring politician – There are laws and customs that we must all respect. Treat every citizen fairly and equally. For some prefer to dig their own graves.
We don’t need to open the history books to know the people who once lived from the Kallang River all the way to Changi.
If WP can make inroads in attracting Malay voters – TAMPINES, EAST COAST, JOO CHIAT AND MARINE PARADE will be under their leadership in 2016. (Pasir Ris-Punggol abit tough because of newbie Singaporeans like Janil Puthucheary)
One Straits Times opinion writer asked why more easterners voted for opposition. The simple reason that those living in the west are recent immigrants. Those living in the east have lived through all the gerrymandering for decades. There is no other way for the ruling party to remain in power other than giving citizenship to obedient workers who were born elsewhere.
Like or Dislike:
16 
0
The GRC scheme was originally claimed to give more representations to the minorities but in actual it was meant to ’shoo in’ a lot of their favorite ones. It was actually been used as an additional barrier to prevent oppositions from entering the parliament after PAP did not feel safe enough even after it more than doubled the number of constituencies from 42 to 87. Obviously this is no longer working given the general improvement in the quality of the opposition candidates.
As for the suggestion that WP enlists Nicole to capture Marine Parade GRC, I don’t quite understand what was meant here. You mean getting Nicole to ‘hop’ to WP? I don’t think Nicole will be suitable for WP. The culture in WP is very different from that of NSP and WP does not have this habit of really co-operating much with other opposition parties given that it is now the big brother among the oppositions and WP feels that it has enough capable people on its own to see the need to use Nicole’s charisma.
The ruling party to me is more and more like a party of nepotism and cronyism. It only trusts its ‘own people’. I don’t think they can attract the real smart ones to join them, only the opportunistic ones! To me, this looks like the beginning of their decline! If they don’t come up with their own ‘cultural revolution’, their decline will be irreversible! I won’t cry for them, neither will I send a coffin for them. http://tinyurl.com/49fjtqm
Like or Dislike:
27 
1
just read the article in the link below and you will know that singapore is not a democratic country, it under the control of the lee dynasty.
http://www.temasekreview.com/2011/06/28/lee-kuan-yew-still-has-private-and-press-secretaries-in-prime-ministers-office/
we want a singaporean first singapore not a pap or fake foreign talent first singapore.
Like or Dislike:
14 
1
Singapore has never been and will never be a democracy while the PAP is in power. LKY does not believe in democracy. For him control is everything. The GRC system was implemented primarily to make it difficult for the opposition to get into Parliament. The PAP thought that having to come up with a candidate belonging to the minority would be an insurmountable hurdle for the opposition. But as shown by the last election the GRC has backfired on the PAP. Their support has dropped so much that even with its gerrymandering it lost 5 seat at a go. Going forward the PAP knows that the GRC will no longer work for them. So what is next? Even more massive vote buying (with taxpayers’ money) is the cards.
Like or Dislike:
14 
0
GRC is good what. Should continue. It’s a weapon of mass destruction. One sweep wipe out three big shots and one prospective leader.
Now PAP don’t dare to put a minister in Aljunied to try to get it back.
If they put a minister it’s a big risk, if don’t put they lose it forever. Put a lousy minister cannot win, put a good one means take big risk of losing him. Lan lan! Hahaha! I like this!
Like or Dislike:
21 
1
hey dnt waste ur time ok
election is over, next PM is our little one coming soon , u know who la, as long country is run ok.. u ppl dont spoil anything can alrdy
Like or Dislike:
0 
13
The word ‘democracy’ does not exist in the PAP vocabulary.
The GRC System is always premeditated to dispirit and deter the opposition from having any significant challenge. 40% of Singaporeans voted for the opposition but PAP takes 81 out of 87 seats. Isn’t this mathematically disproportionate? Any PSLE kids will tell you tell the ratio is incorrect. Do you call this democratic?
This is the dirty tricks of PAP. This is PAP’s born-loser attitude, kiasu, kiasi, kiabo
We shall overcome, my friends, we shall overcome and be freed one day!!!!!! Don’t give up, work on it opposition parties. Recruit more members to join.
Like or Dislike:
12 
0
If I were the opposition, i would not want to change the rules of the game now. not when the tide is moving in opposition favour and more upsets are on the cards at the next election. the PAP has not changed one iota since the last election.
Like or Dislike:
8 
0
we never asked for a GRC system.
we never wanted the GRC system to continue.
in the past, the government could conveniently ignore our request.
they know they cannot now. they will lose another GRC next election at the very least.
they know the People are determined to show them We mean business.
they know that younger people influence the voting of the older folks whom they used to fool in the past.
Like or Dislike:
10 
0
My dear fellow Singaporeans are you still unsure why the GRC system in the GE was implemented?
It was primarily introduced by the men in white to keep away the opposition from gaining access to seats in our parliament. Why? they never want anyone querying their way of governing this country. Our citizens are daft, they have to be lead and ruled by the super intelligent men in white. No question, just abide the laws and rules and keep quiet. They want to be paid in the millions, we have to shut up.
On every GE have you noticed the electoral boundaries are haphazardly drawn? Why this gerrymandering?, Its a ploy to ensure the daft die hard supporters of the men in white are grouped to a sizeable numbers to overcome any encroachment by the opposition.
Well this ploy, by the men in white, will never last. The citizens of Singapore have awaken, they are waiting for the next GE.
Like or Dislike:
14 
0
That is why “oldman” keeps saying you guys are “Daft”.
He knows he has been successfully “twisting” and “gotten” away “scot free”…..and he has the “advantage and gain all these while”
Dafts,will be Dafts!
Like or Dislike:
6 
1
“PM Lee is doing his extreme best for Singapore”
Hey seriously, fellow Singaporean, you believe so. I am very worried for our children future whenever I hear of people like you. If only there were 10% less of the voters like you during GE2011.
Like or Dislike:
6 
0
It is a well known fact that voting thru GRC is actually a disguise to get candidates through the ‘backdoor’ policy. Only those dumb voters can be fooled but not most of us, nowadays.
It surprised me that PM kept stressing that the GRC is to give the minority candiadtes an equal chance to be voted into parliament and that sucks!
And Aljunied voters, I salute you for voting Workers Party !.Remember there is still a score to be settled – Police report on TPL – still OUTSTANDING!
Like or Dislike:
10 
0
Just increase GRC to 10 members. Can opposition find that Super-size ‘A’team. Pasir Ris will cut into Aljunied. Part of Aljunied goes to Tanjong Pagar. Split Aljunied into 3 parts so LTK, SL and CSM cannot be in same GRC. The rebellious East will blended with the decent West.
Win with 55% will be good for PAP in future, but sure win if the above slices are achieved.
You can cry mother, but if Opposition not prepare what PAP can do to the boundaries, 2021 will be another goal.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
The voters give 2/3 of the parliamentary seats to the FAP ruling party….so, to me everything they under the sky is demoncratic
Like or Dislike:
5 
1
No need to worry lah, GRC or not the voters hold the ministers’ fates and with that, their salary and GDP bonuses. What voters have to get rid of is the mindset that Singapore will collapse with the PAP, all that jazz about party track records, who can look after you, who has got better candidates and who gives a damn about the upgrading carrot anymore.
I’m encouraged by what I saw happening at opposition election rallies, so many volunteers helping out and good turnouts too.
Aljunied will be the first of many more to come. The fear of voting against PAP is gone, lots more Gen Y will be eligible to vote in 2016 and the 3 strongest opposition parties will definitely grow in strength.
PAP has still not woken up from its slumber. It was a distant church bell ringing in this election, it will be a beeping alarm clock in the next and a rock concert after that. Even after realigning Aljunied’s boundaries they still lost so even with all their crafty gerrymandering it proves that if people do not want to vote for you it does not matter what the size of the GRC is.
So from now on when PAP talks about renewing its ranks with new blood we citizens can help them out by voting out useless ministers and MPs too! I’m sure you all have your list of people who shouldn’t be in parliament so lets see if they are still there after the next election.
Like or Dislike:
8 
0
IT IS A PARASITIC SCHEME DEVISED BY PARASITE ACTION PARTY.
MEMBERSHIP HAS ITS PRIVILEGES.
A PYRAMID OF PARASITES WITH FAMILEE PARASITE ON TOP TO PULL THE BOOTLICKERS UP TO SERVE LOYALLY THE FAMILEE WITH MILLION DOLLARS SALARY
Like or Dislike:
7 
0
The GRC scheme is just a PAP gerrymandering, pure and simple. However crafty and whatever motivation PAP claimed in using GRC as a protection of minority race interests, it is clear that PAP real objective was in capitlising on the advantages the GRC scheme afforded them.
Our basic rights and democratic principles are furthest from any PAP leaders’ mind.
The GRC scheme must be scrapped. In its place bring back the SMC where the universal one-person-one-vote-for-one-candidate-of-his/her-choice is our basic rights. With this we will minimise the chances of any coat-tail riders like TPL, Kee Chiu, WKS, MBT and some others slipping into our Parliament by the back door.
To ensure the protection of minority rights so that their voices are heard in the Parliament we can have the equivalent of NCMPs and/or NMPs.
A pre-determined of representatives for each minority race can be determined according to the racial make-up of our population (less the PR and FT, of course). Whenever the number of MP, elected during a General Election, for a particular minority race is less than this per-determined number, then the lowest percentage unsuccessful candidates for that race (irrespective of Party in any SMC) will be invited either as NCMP (using the same rules as now). If none is available then qualified individuals of that race shall be invited as NMP to sit in the Parliament.
An additional protection of minority, the Presidential Council of Advisors for Minority Rights (my apologies if the title is wrong) is already in existence for many years.
I am sure there are many other methods to ensure that the voice of the minority races are heard without the GRC. I hope this will rise more suggestions and a plan for PM LHL’s consideration. And PM LHL please show us you really care and dare to change and transform your government for the Singapore’s good.
Like or Dislike:
5 
0
Lets not whinge so much; we can turn the GRC thing against the PAPigs. In fact, I see GRCs as advantageous in 2016 and here’s why:
1) Marine Parade: GCT would have retired. A potentially all-star NSP team vs a new PAP minister-team-leader can be favorable to the opps.
2) Bishan-Kallang-Tempines: WKS, LSS & MBT have all indicated retirement. Newby GRC-team-leaders would weaken all these GRCs.
3) Aljunied: which minister would the PAPigs risk? Whoever, there is a gd chance the opps can again eliminate another high rank PAPig.
4) Strong GRCs: Jurong, WC, EC, AMK etc would become training ground for green opp candidates, thus grounding the PM, 2 DPMs & PAPig resources.
5) Difficult damage control: PAPig screw-ups like Lim Hwee Hua’s Hougang mudsling will affect the other PAPigs in the team. New media will ensure these gaffes are reported.
6) Tanjong Pagar: maybe a 90+ LKY will still be there, even slower and scoring even more own goals than he did this season. That helps.
Overall, the GRC game is not unbeatable. Me thinks we can crack it.
Like or Dislike:
6 
1
“In the 9th and 10th century, Silla was shook from the problems arising from its foundation of the “BONE RANK SYSTEM”, a rigid class system under which only those from an ARISTOCRATIC background could be appointed to HIGH OFFICE. The system was being abused as means for the RULING ROYAL FAMILY to DOMINATE politically and this caused much unrest in the latter days of Silla. The local gentry called hojok (hangul:호족, hanja: 豪族), i.e. mid-level nobility or village chiefs, strengthened their power during this CHAOTIC period by assembling armies of their own and independently centralizing their forces.Dissention deepened more within the nobility after the death of King Hyegong as CONTENTION over royal succession intensified and power struggles were constant among the hojok. Not only was the political atmosphere in shambles, the financial state of Silla was dire. Taxation was difficult without the nobles’ cooperation. As a result, the tax burden fell heavily on the PEASANTS AND FARMERS, who consequently REVOLTED in 889, the third year of Queen Jinseong’s reign. Numerous revolts and uprisings occurred during the following 100 years, breaking Silla down.”
Like or Dislike:
1 
1
flipper:
June 28, 2011 at 3:37 pm
Yes support PM Lee before all of us are doomed. The system must not changed at all. It is a GOOD stable sytem that has served Singapore very well. Everyone in the PAP can work together. We must not rock the very foundation of Singapore. Keep this system for many years to come and we will be Rich and happy. Singapore is already a 1st world A class democracy. We don’t need 3rd world opposition bullshits here. What opposition? They are bunch of sore loser. With no plans at all. Just want to cause mayhem in Singapore. Don’t listen to their bullshitting. Full of lies. Only the PAP can run Singapore well and they have been doing that. keep supporting for the PAP and we will have many good years to come.
———————————————————————
I must say you have been awarded with a PAP PHD.
Good for you if you love it!
Your words simply showed who you are…
Like or Dislike:
1 
5
I am against the GRC because it is not meritocratic or democratic and it allows duds such as Kate Spade, Irene Ng, Jamban Lee, Lim Wee Kiak, Foo Me Har, Janil, Kee Chiu, Vikram Nair and Indejit Singh to get into parliament riding on the tailcoats of the ministers and popular MPs. SMCs is still the most fair way of voting in MPs. However with the fall of PAP’s Berlin Wall, they have a hard time keeping their power with the incompetence of their new MPs. Keeping the current status quo is actually more beneficial to the Alternative Parties than the PAP provided they continue to work hard at their fertile grounds. There will be more gen Y voters and these people will no longer fear or hold PAP with high regards as compared to their parents. The mistakes and controversial remarks made by the PAP MPs will also spread quickly through social media. People won’t be beholden to the PAP ministers and they will dare to vote out the ministers they hate. Real talents who want to reform the system will rather join the Alternative Parties than the PAP. Unless PAP wants to seriously solve the problems facing us and make the media and laws more fair for us, more constituencies will be captured by the Alternative Parties next election.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
Can LKY and his PAP survive if Singapore had been able to enjoy the full benefits of a DEMOCRATIC System ?
LKY had enjoyed the Democratic Political System when the British Colonial Government was here to “ensure” that there was “some degree of a level playing field for all political parties”.
Regretably, when LKY succeeded to be in control of the Internal Self-Government after GE-1959, he went about behind the scene to manipulate the British Colonial authorities – to use their powers to hamper or to arrest his political opponents – while pretending to be defending the democratic rights of his political opponents, and all done so as to ensure his own political survival.
‘GRC’ is another one of LKY’s cunning use of his dark ‘Art of DUPLICITY’ – in which he had used hifalutin ideals to promote the scheme that is supposed to ensure ethnic minority representation in parliamentary politics, but in actual practise the GRC scheme is no more then to serve his own agenda of political survival.
In the first place, what is the use of ensuring that the ethnic minority will have representation in Parliamentary Politics, when every Member of Parliament has no individual rights to exercise their independent vote to represent themselves or their constituents; and has to submit to the PAP Parliamentary Whip that is controlled by LKY and the PAP Central Executive Committee ?
‘DUPLICITY’ is the hallmark of the PAP and the Mentor that depend on it for the past five decades.
Like or Dislike:
6 
1
Do you think GRC will be there in next election? NO.
Like or Dislike:
11 
1
In the next GE I will let my German Shepard K-9 to stand in Marine Parade and I bet you my K-9 wil definately win better than Rin Tin Tin, Kate Spade, I don’t know what to say..my K-9 says WOOF ! WOOF !
Like or Dislike:
5 
2
GRC is the instrument pushed up some without calibre, child-playing candidate(s), to be a MP. Singaporean will never this incident until 2016.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
No, it definitely is not democratic.
PAP-nomics sometimes I think its PAP-comics if only if its not so funny.
PAP-nomics maintains its control in 2 ways
1. POWER – Parliament Majority through the GRC undemocratic system
2. MONEY – Presidential Act – Chapter22B[ii]
With 1 & 2 they rule the land under the Singapore sky.
Watch this Taiwanese talk show on Youtube mocking our undemocratic Election system :
http://papnomics.blogspot.com/2011/06/singapores-parliament.html
&
Singapore Constitution Chapter 22B[ii]
http://papnomics.blogspot.com/2011/06/singapore-presidency-hidden-agenda.html
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
BEWARE!! BEWARE!! GRC IS AN OLD STRATEGY. SURELY THE MEN IN WHITE KNOW ITS RUNNING OUT OF ITS USEFULNESS, JUST WAIT AND SEE- DO NOT BE SURPRISE THEY THEMSELVES WILL SCRAP IT BUT BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION NEW UNDER HANDED SCHEME AND RULES WILL BE INTRODUCED TO PROP UP THE MEN IN WHITE.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Politics is similar to a team sport and not an individual sport. Voters choose both the party and the individual. If GRC is not according to democratic principles, why not ask all candidates to stand as indepenedent canfidate.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Come 2016 – this is wat will happen:
East Coast GRC – falls into WP’s hands
Tampines and Marine Parade GRC – Into NSP’s
Sembawang and Tanjong Pagar GRC – into SDP’s domain.
Like or Dislike:
4 
0