AGC not appealing convicted pedophile Joshua Robinson’s sentence

The Attorney-Generals Chambers (AGC) has announced that it will not be appealing the sentence meted out to pedophile Joshua Robinson.

The American was sentenced to 4-years imprisonment after he pleaded guilty to 9 charges, 3 charges for offences of sexual penetration of minor under 16 punishable under section 376A(2) of the Penal Code, 4 charges of making an obscene film punishable under section 29(1)(a) of the Films Act, 1 charge of possession of obscene films punishable under section 30(1) of the Films Act, and 1 charge of exhibiting an obscene object to a young person punishable under section 293 of the Penal Code.

Another 20 charges were taken into consideration during sentencing.

Responding to the public’s outcry over the light sentence meted out to Joshua Robinson and why he was not charged for “sexual assaults”, rape or statutory rape, the AGC clarified:

  • For the sexual acts committed with the two 15 year-old victims, Robinson was charged with the offence of sexual penetration of a minor under 16 years of age, punishable under section 376A(2) of the Penal Code. This was the most serious charge that the Prosecution could have brought on the facts of this case.
  • As these two victims were above 14 years of age at the time when Robinson committed the sexual acts with them, the offence of statutory rape was not committed.
  • Both these victims had consented to the sexual acts. Therefore, the offences of rape and outrage of modesty were not committed. By the same token, these were not cases of “sexual assault”.
  • While caning is provided for the offence under s 376A(3) of the Penal Code for sexual penetration of a minor under 14 years of age, caning is not provided for any of the offences Robinson was charged with.

AGC added that before the District Court, the Prosecution had sought a total sentence of 4 to 5 years’ imprisonment. The Prosecution’s sentencing position was made known to the defence counsel and to the District Court at a pre-trial conference in September 2016.

The Prosecution’s sentencing position was conveyed to Robinson before he made his decision in December 2016 to plead guilty. In arriving at this sentencing position, the Prosecution took into account, among other things, the fact that by securing a guilty plea, the three young victims would be spared the trauma of having to testify and be cross-examined in a trial.

The sentences imposed in this case were broadly in line with relevant sentencing precedents. In light of the sentencing position which the Prosecution had conveyed to Robinson and the fact that his subsequent plea of guilt had spared the victims from the ordeal of a trial, the Public Prosecutor will not be appealing against the sentence.

AGC reiterates that in discharging its duties, it does not discriminate between Singaporeans and Foreigners and the sentence was in line with other case precedents.

 

 

 

Sponsored Content

32 Responses to “AGC not appealing convicted pedophile Joshua Robinson’s sentence”

  • Fcuk you pappy:

    So many cases involving elites and FTs getting very lenient sentences:-

    I cite 3 examples:-

    1. The PRC millionaire turned new citIzen who tried snatching a gun – 1 year?

    2. Woffles – 1 year?

    3. Yang Yin – big discount 2 years then public anger, raised 3 more?

    Then put Kumar as new AGC?

    Knn la, unless Sinkies have no eyes to see, it’s getting so obvious. Even job stats reflect 99% went to foreigners, no discrimination?

    Are you guys really Singaporeans? You guys have any conscience at all?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • LIONS:

    So Michael Fay’s offence was way more serious to deserve caning?
    Or,the PAP gahmen scared of the wrath of Donald Trump?

    As usual,ang moh tua kee.
    Next time,any other sinilar offender will also be pubished the same manner?
    Expect more ang mohs to screw around with our laws.

    This is proof aliens are treated better than sg. Citizens here.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Lye Khuen Way:

    The burning question was why wasn’t Robinson charged under Section 375 with regards to the two above 14 girls, even if consents were presumably given?
    Or this Mixed Martial Arts exponent do give our Authorities the jitters? Like what those 2 14+ girls felt?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • daft kunts:

    “Are you guys really Singaporeans? You guys have any conscience at all?”

    yes we are!
    but phai seh, we bo lumphar chee, bo pien lay!
    we have stockholm symdrome many years oredi
    tui erm choo hor?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • flabbergasted:

    Bank to manchurian days, white shit can get away with murder!!!

    Anyway, Sarong Party Girls throw themselves at any dog that is white. Timely lesson.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Why no caning?:

    Ang moh getting special treatment from PAP. Again. It bullies Singaporeans but kowtows to kwai lo.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Uncle Lim:

    This in a broader sense is a politically motivated punishment which has enraged many. As this is a PAP SPF, it’s thus not surprising.

    Putting a PAP member in AGC is yet another proof
    we are a de facto police state.

    If that culprit is a WP member, aha AGC will throw the book at him.

    Worse and worse, PAP even wants to have an ally in AGC apart from all the paper generals holding up the Clown’s arse.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    IF I AM NOT MISTAKEN, I recall having read on the internet of MSM publishing one instance of a young pimp who failed to report to the police that his friend – a client of his business – has in possession in his brothel some stolen ammunition. This pimp was NOT part of the crime of stolen ammunition which the thief/felon was convicted.

    The pimp’s failure to report a crime got him convicted of crime as well. He got sentenced to several years of imprisonment and several stroke of the cane

    I thought that was very harsh because there are a lot of witnesses to crime events on the public street but not reporting the same to the police. Why was he harshly convicted and caned thereafter for his mere silence? This pimp had thought, correctly, that it is none of his business. His occupation is neither moral nor divine, so why be a hypocrite and report his client’s offence to the law and also getting himself into jail for his “pimping” business living on the immoral earning of his working girls.

    So the troubling question is this – will the public mind going to ask (logically??) why the AGC not appealing to ask for the 3 counts of convicted penetration of a minor to RUN CONSECUTIVELY instead of concurrently?

    After all, a young boy of maybe 19 years of age got jailed and caned for keeping his mouth shut – having been aware that one of his client brought a personal bag into his brothel with some stolen ammunition – but for which otherwise he (the pimp) has NO COMPLICITY of crime offence?

    I am sure criminal lawyers in Sinkieland must have known of all the other relevant facts of this case.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Bewilded:

    For the first 3 sentences of “24 months imprisonment per charge”, can anyone explain why the judge ordered them to run concurrently, instead of consecutively? That’s a very generous discount of 4 years!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Bapak:

    “sparing the trauma” – is it bargainable? How about using a condom for being considerate therefore a lesser crime? 2 years then? Then send them for counselling, to cure their emotional trauma. For being so caring – no crime. What kind of law is this?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    @Lye Khuen Way,

    Good point there you have raised. “Consent” issue is BEWILDERING – because consents can be extracted via fear of verbal or physical threat & abuse, overwhelming physical domination, naivety even “temporary insanity” of stupidity mind thoughts, and even persistent persuasion in case of sexual crime involving intelligent adult exerting power and influence over a age minor such that REAL CONSENT is unavailable or absent in the circumstances.

    Who has the ONUS of proving REAL CONSENT (not merely consent presumed or secured in circumstances of domination, fear and weakness of mind under pressure) – is that ONUS of the prosecution or the defendant.

    When there is no trial, how is real consent established in fact and in law?

    I AM MYSTIFIED.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • KNN:

    AGC’s reasons for not increasing the XX number of years imprisonment & go fight in court holds no water:

    – minors such as those 2 14+/15+ yr old girls can testify & be cross-examined separate from the court room via tele-conference (can off the video to remain anonymous). In fact the room the girls stay in can be far away from the court itself, so there won’t be any reporters, busybodies etc. Their names can also be withheld in the court proceedings and just be called Primary Witness 1 & 2. The judge can make it crystal clear to the defense lawyer not to engage in salacious questioning or humiliation tactics when cross-examining the girls, and the judge can step in & formally reprimand the lawyer if he does so. Unless the lawyer don’t mind throwing away his legal career in S’pore, he will listen to the judge.

    – it is so obvious that Joshua Robinson & his lawyer made a plea bargain with AGC i.e. plead guilty to lesser offence & lesser punishment. Both sides were bargaining on the punishment and finally negotiated & agreed on 4 years jail. I bet it is Robinson’s lawyer that told AGC if they want more than 4 yrs then they will go to court & tekan the 3 girls including the 6 yr old.

    – becoz it was a plea bargain & legally binding on both AGC and Robinson, hence AGC now cannot change the punishment or the charges.

    – the only way is to change the govt, fire all the current AGC dept, and re-open the case. Probability is 0% therefore Robinson will walk free in 2 YRS 8 MTHS for “good behavior”.

    – Be HAPPY Sinkies!!!! You all voted for it!!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Sillypore Is For Everyone:

    Evil PAP has made this silly speck a New haven for all fools, cheaters, crooks, liars, greeds and rapists.
    This is the kind of FT scum that was fronting the Contact Sillypore.

    Well-done greedy pinky loong for showing your multi billion dollars talent, creating an unprecedented mess of this place.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • sorry about the petition:

    people are saying that the 4 years sentence is too lenient.
    the pp had asked for 4 to 5 years sentences.
    the petition cried out that 4 years was too short.
    the explaination and clarification did it clarified anything at all.

    you all read about minor offenceS all the time in the news in SG. for example – max sentence is 2 years under the law. the offender was given 3 months jail INSTEAD OF 2 YEARS. you get the point !!!!!!

    WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM SENTIENCES ALLOWED IN THE angmo pedo CASE.
    NOTE = pp asked for 4 to 5 years.
    izzit the maximum could be 10 to 15 years allowed by the law?
    anybody know?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • found it:

    sorry about the petition:
    people are saying that the 4 years sentence is too lenient.
    the pp had asked for 4 to 5 years sentences.
    the petition cried out that 4 years was too short.
    the explaination and clarification did it clarified anything at all.

    you all read about minor offenceS all the time in the news in SG. for example – max sentence is 2 years under the law. the offender was given 3 months jail INSTEAD OF 2 YEARS. you get the point !!!!!!

    WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM SENTIENCES ALLOWED IN THE angmo pedo CASE.
    NOTE = pp asked for 4 to 5 years.
    izzit the maximum could be 10 to 15 years allowed by the law?
    anybody know?

    saw this on reuters just now.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-singapore-crime-idUSKBN16G0HD

    Consensual sexual intercourse with minors of 14 and above carries a maximum jail term of 10 years or fine or both in Singapore. The legal age of consent is 16.

    Joshua Robinson, 39, was convicted last week of the sex acts, which he had filmed, and for showing child pornography to a six-year-old.

    Prosecutors had asked for a sentence of four to five years and a S$20,000 ($14,200) fine. They said they were not planning to appeal.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    @ Sorry about the petition

    You asked about “WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM SENTIENCES ALLOWED IN THE angmo pedo CASE”

    I did a quick search of the Australian legal database on the internet. Here is one convicted case which the higher court even REFUSED to grant an appeal against the punishment handed out to the felon. This is an incest case, of a young daughter treated in the court as a child rape case.

    http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/qld/QCA/1997/453.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=LEGAL%20CONSENT%20%20%20RAPE

    Under the caption read – REASONS FOR JUDGMENT – LEE J

    Judgment delivered 19 December 1997

    You find this detail of sentencing imposed on the Applicant (the incestuous father the appellant).

    “The applicant was sentenced to three years imprisonment on each of the six counts of indecent dealing, seven and a half years imprisonment on each of the four counts of incest, and twelve months imprisonment on the count of assault occasioning bodily harm, all sentences to be served concurrently.”

    You will noticed two things – THE SENTENCE IS TO BE SERVED CONCURRENTLY and THE FELON IS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED ON EACH COUNT OF OFFENCE (such that if one count of offence happening is 3 years, 6 counts would earn the convicted felon 18 years) and for 4 counts of indecent assault causing bodily harm each attracting 7.5 years jail term (total of 30 years) etc etc…. the total is still 30 years even though the sentence is ordered to be served concurrently.

    THE MOST BEWILDERING TO ME IS THE LAW ARCHITECTS IN THE AGC, they seems to have constructed a offence punishment that is STRANGELY much LIGHTER of rape of a minor (whose consent is easier to extract by the rapist) than a MORE SEVERE PUNISHMENT awaiting a rapist of an adult informed mind of its victim (where it is much harder for the defendant to prove consent given).

    In other words, easier to rape and get away with crime, lighter sentence, harder to rape more severe punishment – my mind thinks the ORDER SHOULD BE REVERSED. That is a child minor needs a STRONGER PROTECTION of the law than an adult who can defend herself or avail herself to the protection of the law after the fact of unwanted and unwelcomed rape.

    ME THINKS THAT THE AGC URGENTLY NEEDS TO DO SOME HARD RE-THINKING ON ITS LAW DEFINITION AND LAW APPLICATIONS.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Lye Khuen Way:

    Thanks, Oxygen for sharing my view that the ” contents” reported were never tested in Court.
    The AGC was according to their side of the debacle trying to secure ” some punishment ” within subjecting the 2 then 15 years old to an trial.

    Very thoughtful after the Benjamin suicide case, no?

    Why have a Pre trail bargain? Again, my un-substainciated belief that this Mixed Martial Arts exponent must have intimidated someone as he would reasonably have his two underaged victims.

    Actually, I am amused that The Law Minister had sort of agreed with my argument that the correct section of the Penal Code to use was 375.

    oxygen:
    @Lye Khuen Way,

    Good point there you have raised. “Consent” issue is BEWILDERING – because consents can be extracted via fear of verbal or physical threat & abuse, overwhelming physical domination, naivety even “temporary insanity” of stupidity mind thoughts, and even persistent persuasion in case of sexual crime involving intelligent adult exerting power and influence over a age minor such that REAL CONSENT is unavailable or absent in the circumstances.

    Who has the ONUS of proving REAL CONSENT (not merely consent presumed or secured in circumstances of domination, fear and weakness of mind under pressure) – is that ONUS of the prosecution or the defendant.

    When there is no trial, how is real consent established in fact and in law?

    I AM MYSTIFIED.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Rats can't vomit:

    Singapore is the modern Sodom and Gomorrah, it will be purged for its evil existence.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Rats can't vomit:

    Fcuk you pappy:
    So many cases involving elites and FTs getting very lenient sentences:-

    I cite 3 examples:-

    1. The PRC millionaire turned new citIzen who tried snatching a gun – 1 year?

    2. Woffles – 1 year?

    3. Yang Yin – big discount 2 years then public anger, raised 3 more?

    Then put Kumar as new AGC?

    Knn la, unless Sinkies have no eyes to see, it’s getting so obvious. Even job stats reflect 99% went to foreigners, no discrimination?

    Are you guys really Singaporeans? You guys have any conscience at all?

    There was Anton Casey too.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • nizhemoshou:

    Damn pap living up to its nickname , the Pimps and Prostitute Party? Otherwise why mus show mercy to a confirmed incorrigible and dangerous paedophile and child porno sex criminal? Letting his sentence be light despite so many charges against him by letting his sentence in every categories of the charges run concurrently.
    [Btw can w know what were the other 20 charges that was taken into consideration as stated ? Could any of them relates to there actually more than 2 underaged victims that showed up amongst his child porno collection?]

    In today’s civilised countries, the law is harsh to such sex criminal [altho alas not so for pap run Sg]. Regardless such criminal pleads guilty or not. regardless the sex with his underaged young is consensual or not, his punishment mus still not be light as there is overiding need to protect the vulnerable children and immature young in society from such menace and to send a strong message to the criminals and like minded persons as well.

    Moreover, what AGC say about the sex was consensual seem to run contrary with the report of the case in media . Was it not reported the victim who reported to police actually panic and wanted to leave the house.but the paedophile brute forced her into his bathroom despite her protests. She went home to tell her parent and they went to police ; and that was how the bas***d got arrested. Had she choose to keep quiet out of fear , the existence of this foreign devil in our country would not come to light and more immature kids would be lured by him into his den to satisfy his insatiable paedophile appetite and to be filmed by him too..

    The fact he broke his bail condition by boldly approaching a 6 yrs old girl goes to show he dared to do so as he has no fear of the law in papland having been told beforehand he would get a light sentence. He isnt the lone foreign devil to know about pap soft spot for them. Pap can pretend to deny all it wants but the reality speaks for itself.

    Sg has bcome a haven destination for sex trafficking , child sex offenders and even forced child labour only bcos the govt allows it to happen.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • No surprises here:

    Had he not been a Westerner, it would’ve been a very different story.

    We have a different set of laws for locals and foreigners.

    We really do put foreigners before our own people unlike our neighbours.

    What else is new???

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Fark AGC An Indian Court:

    When Singaporean do not report incident, they got jail + cane.
    When Singaporeans reported UNFAIR and UNJUST practices in AGC,
    they said they are RIGHT?
    In Singapore, as long as YOU ARE LOCAL, YOU ARE BEING DISCRIMINATED!
    Fark PAp.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • thebastardPAPparty:

    American smart
    vote for america first

    same as British
    vote for BREXIT

    local Singapore stupid
    vote for PAP that screw them with foreigners

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    @ Lye Khuen Way,

    THAT IS STARTLING DISCLOSURE, if your assertion is correct, that the honorable Law Minister had sort of agreed with your argument that the correct section of the Penal code to apply was s375.

    Could that means it was a BOTCHED JOB in the AGC which have not come out to explain why consent (I mean real consent, not coerced consent or consent extracted via application of power/influence an adult would easily exercised over a naive kid) was established (by whose determination was that??) both in fact and in law?

    I noted that the most learned Law Minister did indicated publicly that appeal was under consideration in the AGC – that is suggestive of disagreement within the prosecution (AGC & the Minister, otherwise the Minister would have excluded this possibility at the outset)

    Lye Khuen Way: Actually, I am amused that The Law Minister had sort of agreed with my argument that the correct section of the Penal Code to use was 375.

    If there is any disagreement – before and after the case conclusion and outcome – between the Minister and the AGC, it is a serious matter of incongruence of how the prosecution was handled and the divided stances post the judgment outcome/sentencing.

    AND IT IS THIS POINT WHICH UNDERLINE WHY I HAVE STRONG OBJECTION TO THE AGC PROSECUTING LEGAL CASES, DRAFT LAWS AND ADVISES THE MINISTER. Why?

    As of now, AGC is the law architect, the Minister’s adviser and also the prosecution. In a screwed-up job like this, who take responsibility and re-set direction.

    Secondly, Ms Indranee Rajah is telling 1% truth of correctness when she compared Singapore to Australia on the politician-AGC role connection. She was DEAD WRONG. In Australia, we have an attorney-general who is a POLITICIAN always and that politician is the LAW MINISTER which is the incumbent party. When the incumbent party is toppled from power in election, we get a NEW POLITICIAN LAW MINISTER from the newly emerging ruling party. BUT THERE IS ANOTHER BIG DIFFERENCE.

    The AG also Law Minister advises the Government and is also the Commonwealth law architect BUT THE LAW MINISTER or AG DOES NOT PROSECUTE ANY CRIME OFFENCE. In other words, the AG/Law Minister is not AN ARCHITECT OF FAULTY LAW and apply injustice in prosecution.

    Any prosecution can only be done through a SEPARATE ORGAN of the law enforcement arm – the OFFICE OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION (OPP). They have strict guidelines on when to and when NOT TO prosecute and when those failed – there is ACCOUNTABILITY.

    The AGC can propose prosecution but OPP can REFUSE and if undertaken, OPP decide what section of law apply and how.

    INDRANEE RAJAH IS…

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    @ Lye Khuen Way,

    My truncated post at 9.38 pm below

    oxygen: INDRANEE RAJAH IS…

    should be read as

    oxygen: INDRANEE RAJAH IS DEAD WRONG

    of comparing Singapore to Australia. In a botched prosecution when there is incongruence between the positional stance of the Law Minister and the AGC, who takes responsibility for the outcome?

    If we have a SEPARATE OFFICE OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION, the OPP can refused to undertake prosecution if the law is deem faulty or full of loopholes or lagoons which may render the prosecution to end in failure or an outcome inconsistent with what Parliament intent of protection of minor from sexual predator – the STUBBORN REFUSAL OF THE OPP will force the Minister and the AGC to redraft is law.

    No point talking about drafting law changes AFTER A BIG SCREW-UP which sparked a nation-wide outcry.

    The existence of an OPP is a good COUNTER CHECK AND BALANCE against any excess of irrelevant or ill-motivated prosecution and also provide a test bed for the rigor of evidence before presenting its prosecution in the courtroom.

    For the AGC to advise the Govt and prosecute the state case against the accused risks blind enthusiasm yo score the performance report card and conveniently walk away from incompetent handling of cases for both the Minister and the AGC (the AGC won’t blame the Minister for stupidity of not blocking the case and the Minister not blaming the AGC of dumb incompetence as law architect and prosecutor).

    After all, law is never a static DUMB rule of do’s or don’t. Law is an evolving social phenomena according to society changing mores and values. Nearly 10 years ago, perhaps, gay sexuality is criminal behavior but in today’s values, WHO CARES WHAT ANOTHER BEING PRACTICES IN HIS/HER BEDROOM SPORTS?

    Neither the AGC or the Law Minister is interested in discovering what goes on under the sheets, right, never mind what the architecture in the statutory law says.

    So why NOT let the prosecution be undertaken of discretion by a SEPARATE OFFICE OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION AND HOLD THEM TO ACCOUNTABILITY BY SOCIETY if they fail at law. The public outcry for failed or frivolous unfair prosecution is enough to “keep the b*stards honest” is the lingo.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Concerned Housewife:

    The two girls are 14+/15+. Even a 30 years old woman would be helpless alone facing a beefy martial art expert, consensual? Must be kidding.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • simple:

    simple reasoning, dun think to far.
    victims, daughters of high profile parents, want to wrap up case as soon as possible.
    so authority give the easy way out.
    lenient sentence, magnet for GLOBAL maniacs gather in Singapore.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • what a joke:

    Just read that a Rolex cheat may get a 10-year sentence and this chap is sentenced to only 4 years for destroying lives of young girls? Which offence is more serious? The law is such a joke!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • apakhabar:

    The gahmen made the Law.
    End story.
    There is no protection for our young and vulnerable children.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Just wondering:

    Just wondering how many of these screaming foul play are just as wayang as the papists and gang of reward seeking plps? How many are actually looking forward to the little red carrots hanging out like the red laterns with a difference that the latter pay and get what they pay for while the former they pay to be badly screwed after they happily put the actors on the stafpge to wayang once again with them.

    Pathetic Sinkies. If what happened to AGC appt happen anywhere even as close by as Malaysia or Indonesia, hell ga te breaks! White and rotten bananas!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Concerned Housewife:

    Watch this video below to feel the suffering of the victims and their families. Please sign the petition on Joshua Robinson’s case:

    https://youtu.be/suySIL2ek5Y

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

 characters available


SPONSORED CONTENT


Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement











Most Recent Comments
  • PAP has the mandate: It is well known the pedophiles are heading to Stinkapore and south east asian, only gong gong,...
  • Bitter Gourd: 70% still believe PAP is a good govt. By next GE,perhaps could pshyco another 15% to 20% to join in to...
  • pakuqaz: guys just ignore those basted ACLS and lawyers. ballless MF.
  • 苏珊: No Means .能成为人民解放军一员,为党效力,尽忠职守,非常光荣。臭小子 不识趣。他的损失。 Cynical Investor: Hehehe. At this rate serving NS would...
  • wownoob: Singapore is included in the list of countries la…2nd page first entry…
  • 苏珊: 你很有空 ? 三叔: 突然间变得好喜欢你!
  • Limbo Rock: Nothing further from the truth. Could be TRump telling LHL to buy their F-35 or they send AY back....
  • RDB: Many a Singaporean adult focused mostly or even only on Amos Yee’s expletive “F…” they...
  • Very free lawyer associations: If Reason is on ur side, be Forgiving. If Justice is on ur side, be Humble. The...
Announcement
Support TR Emeritus
Support TR Emeritus:
Other Amount:
Advertisement
Advertisement
Free Classifieds
  • Sample of a Premium 4 Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Premium 4 Ad (can upl...
    [Read more]

  • [$9 Shareme Headphone or $99 Karaoke Sound Bar] HD 1280x800, 3000 Lumens, Wifi, Bluetooth, Android I

    AFFORDABLE HIGH DEFINITION HOME ENTERTAINMENT PACK...
    [Read more]

Readers Statistic
Latest Statistic