Childcare: Stingy $50m – $5.2b Budget surplus?

I refer to the article “What the new playing field for pre-school offers” (Sunday Times, Mar 19)

It states that “The median monthly fee fell from $900 at end-2015 to $856 in January last year – the first drop in at least a decade – and has stayed at that level since, based on the latest figures.

Also, The Sunday Times reported earlier this year that 15 per cent of childcare centres here planned to raise fees this year – lower than the 20-25 per cent in previous years.”

Compared to the monthly median fee (before GST) of $750 in 2012 and $690 in 2010 – fees have risen by 14 and 24 per cent in the last four and six years, respectively.

In this connection, did childcare subsidies increase in tandem with the fee increases, on a yearly basis?

With the relentless increases in the cost of water, service and conservancy fees, electricity, gas, childcare, parking, rubbish, university, food and drinks (hawkers’ misc fees) in the last nine months or so – many parents with children in childcare may be struggling to make ends meet (“10 price increase last 9 months: Govt keeping close eye on business costs?” (Mar 4).

I would also like to refer to the article “Enjoying economies of scale but more grants needed amid rising costs” (Sunday Times, Mar 19).

It states that “His plea: Give us more government funding, like those received by anchor or partner operators, and we would be able to pay our teachers well and offer good-quality programmes, too.

Govt set aside $250m over 5 years

Anchor and partner operators are government-appointed. They must cap fees at $720 and $800 a month respectively for full-day childcare and have stricter quality criteria, but they get sizeable grants. In 2015, the Government set aside $250 million over five years for the 28 anchor and partner operators. Over 40 per cent of Singaporean children are enrolled in centres run by these operators.”

Only spend $50m a year on childcare centres’ funding?

Does this mean that the average spending a year to help parents pay for childcare is only about $50 million a year ($250 million divided by 5 years)?

$30 monthly per child?

As there are 137,278 childcare places in 2016 – does it mean that the average spending per child per month may only be about $30 ($50 million divided by 137,278 childcare places divided by 12 months)?

$5.2b Budget surplus, but only $50m to childcare centres?

With a Budget surplus of $5.2 billion last year, why didn’t we spend more on the funding support to childcare centres, and why don’t we spend more in the next year and in the future?

 

Leong Sze Hian

 

Sponsored Content

3 Responses to “Childcare: Stingy $50m – $5.2b Budget surplus?”

  • Get What You Voted, Stupid:

    What do dafts want? A meal at hawker centre, food court or restaurant?
    $50M is way too much to pay for nurturing dafts.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Uncle Lim:

    PAP invests in themselves NOT in Sporeans. They treat taxpayers money as if it is their own money.

    Caring for Sporeans in particular the poor has never been their priority, wayang yes.

    The now dead dictator was always a selfish person. Dishonorable Son follows in the footsteps of Father Scrooge.

    Like his Father, Son is never happy if you benefit in any way eg people who go to JB have to pay tolls. Even at Parks or the seaside he makes you pay.

    Familee must go.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Uncle Lim:

    MIW need the Budget surplus in order to Ensure they continue to pay themselves obscene salaries.

    And for them to invest in themselves.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement





Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement



Most Recent Comments
  • flabbergasted: Seow Leow: All the PAP silly billies try to muddy up the issue. The real matter is : LKY has...
  • 亜李爸爸: Let us all put our efforts to get the PM to be accountable to this serious wrong doing, a case just as serious...
  • PAP cocksuker: When we go for our BMT in the army we are made to swear allegiance to the President and the...
  • blueview: Tharman, President Tony Tan is keeping his mouth SHUT and ENJOYING HIS PENSION AND HIS MILLIONS! Can you do...
  • blueview: It is also called KARMA!
  • Amos humiliate L*L and PAP: Cisco Kid: Cabinet needs to explain clearly their reasons for wanting to preserve...
  • LHY vs. LHL: Even an ordinary man can read the simple language in a written will, let alone SG’s great man LKY...
  • Bebe: What kind of a elder brother would not trust his own siblings? Instead of protecting his own siblings and...
  • A Nation Of Dumb Parrots: These are all yes men. All interviewed and recruited the same way, drank the same tea, sang...
  • Who Stole My HDB?: Need more on La wrence Wong: Good idea. Need to know if Lawrence Wong is also...
  • All In The Familee: Someone did say: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his...
  • Oldtimer: Pretty pointless in keeping the house if no one can enter it. Unless of course, a law is passed saying it...
  • Twelve Years NS Deferment: flabbergasted: tony tan, where are you? why and for what are you keeping quiet? everybody...
  • l'ingenieur: There are two camps in SG right now. Those that think that slathering on the makeup can bring on the...
  • Snake-Catcher: Dear Sweet-Talker Indranee Rajah, Very shameful leh, You know or not? Please don’t speak like a...
  • Total Stupidity Inc.®: Indranee Rajah’s analysis of the will is far more subtle and complicated than a...
  • Bapak: It has already happened in Termasick my friend that’s why they are losing money. To the D1 & D2...
  • opposition dude: The house can be demolished, why would there be any law that says a house cannot be demolished? So...
  • BuyMeBakKutTeh: WL n HY… thank you both for speaking up. Be it private or public. Both of u have opened a big...
  • BBC: Its over Folks: China PLA involved in wars in the 21st Century… hahaha. CCP should award you a medal...
  • New Egg Yoke: Even if Christ, Buddha or Allah were to appear in Holy Trinity and backs LWL and LHY, Pinky and...
  • TWL: The use of a ministerial committee is absolutely inappropriate and an abuse of power. trying to resolve a family...
  • Remember: She cleaned up as a daughter in law, but arranged to loan the items as PMO point of contact. Does anyone...
  • Bapak: The second point was that the Oxley Road house is no longer a private matter, as it is closely bound up in the...
Announcement
Support TR Emeritus
Support TR Emeritus:
Other Amount:
Advertisement
Advertisement
Free Classifieds
  • Enjoy stunning views at half the rental rates

    Now Starting at just $3.60 psf per month, we have ...
    [Read more]

  • shree Travels and Transport Company.

    shree Travels and Transport C/o. We are providing ...
    [Read more]

Readers Statistic
Latest Statistic