50% of Singaporeans had less than $18 net pay increase?

$660m wage credit payout to employers

I refer to the article “$660m in payouts for employers by end of March ” (Straits Times, Mar 18).

It states that “More than 85,000 employers will receive a total of about $660 million in Wage Credit Scheme (WCS) payouts by the end of this month

Under the extended WCS, the Government co-funds 20 per cent of wage increases given to Singaporean employees earning a gross monthly wage of $4,000 and below, over 2015 to 2017.”

No mention of the no. of eligible workers?

When I read the above – the first “curious” thought that came to my mind was – why no mention of the number of workers who were eligible for the wage credit?

Since there is no breakdown of the workforce statistics into Singaporeans and permanent residents (PRs), and only Singaporeans can qualify for the wage credit – I estimate that the number earning up to $4000 to be about 900,000 (since the median gross income was $3,823).

Since the 20 per cent co-funding wage credit is computed from the last two years’ wage increase of at least $50 a year – I estimate the average wage increase per eligible worker for 2016 (assuming three quarters of the workers met the criteria) to be about $200 a month ($660 million divided by 0.4 (co-fund 20% for 2 years’ wage increases) divided by 675,000 (75% of workers).

To put this in perspective – $200 is a five per cent wage increase for a worker earning $4,000.

0.7% wage increase last year

Actually, my curiosity was aroused because I remember reading in the news that the median gross income of full-time employed Singaporeans only increased by 0.7 per cent to $3,823 last year.

This works out to a wage increase of about $27 monthly ($3,823 divided by 1.007 – $3,823).

Since this is including employer CPF contribution – the increase excluding employer CPF contribution is about $23 ($27 divided by 1.17).

$18 increase in take-home pay?

If we deduct the typical 20 per cent employee’s CPF contribution – the increase in take-home pay (disposable income) is only about $18 ($23 less 20%).

50% of S’poreans had less than $18 pay increase?

So, since this is the median – does it mean that about half of the full-time employed Singaporeans had a wage increase (take-home pay) of only $18 or less?

Total wage increase of all the workers earning up to $4,000 – $250m?

Hence, I estimate the total wage increase for workers earning less than $4,000 to be about $250 million ($23 x 12 months x 900,000 workers).

Now, let’s get back to the wage credit.

20% co-fund wage increase is $660m, but all workers’ wage increase $250m?

Here’s where it may be puzzling. If the Government paid $660 million to co-fund 20 per cent of the wage increase for those workers earning up to $4,000 who had at least a $50 wage increase – why is the estimated total wage increase for all the full-time employed Singaporeans earning up to $4,000, only about $250 million?

Why? – low or no wage increase or cut, unemployed, self-employed?

Well, some possible reasons may be that a significant number may have had a wage increase of less than $50, no wage increase, a wage cut, became unemployed (estimated to be over 100,000 Singaporeans), free-lance, self-employed, etc.

 

Leong Sze Hian

 

 

Sponsored Content

4 Responses to “50% of Singaporeans had less than $18 net pay increase?”

  • Sperm:

    The 70% deserve this pay increase. This is their country.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • I hope pap won 99%:

    Why i hope for 99%?

    All of them gonna suffer more than ever.
    The more the merrier!

    Hahahahaaaa!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • opposition dude:

    Well I had a zero percent increase in my pay in 2015 and 2016. I don’t expect anything different this year or next either.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • RDB:

    And waiting for the lift, when I mentioned to a neighbour of the now become odd jobs working class types about PAP’s 30% water tariff increase still need to add in 1. Water conservation tax & 2. Water consumption tax AND then ADD 7% GST. She simply replied “It is like that” in simplistic surrender uninterested since she still has a job & is surviving! Oh Blimey! The negative effects of our high level of Fluoride in our tap water was expounded by SDP’s lady speaker at Hong Lim Park lately.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

 characters available


SPONSORED CONTENT


Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement











Most Recent Comments
  • PAP has the mandate: It is well known the pedophiles are heading to Stinkapore and south east asian, only gong gong,...
  • Bitter Gourd: 70% still believe PAP is a good govt. By next GE,perhaps could pshyco another 15% to 20% to join in to...
  • pakuqaz: guys just ignore those basted ACLS and lawyers. ballless MF.
  • 苏珊: No Means .能成为人民解放军一员,为党效力,尽忠职守,非常光荣。臭小子 不识趣。他的损失。 Cynical Investor: Hehehe. At this rate serving NS would...
  • wownoob: Singapore is included in the list of countries la…2nd page first entry…
  • 苏珊: 你很有空 ? 三叔: 突然间变得好喜欢你!
  • Limbo Rock: Nothing further from the truth. Could be TRump telling LHL to buy their F-35 or they send AY back....
  • RDB: Many a Singaporean adult focused mostly or even only on Amos Yee’s expletive “F…” they...
  • Very free lawyer associations: If Reason is on ur side, be Forgiving. If Justice is on ur side, be Humble. The...
Announcement
Support TR Emeritus
Support TR Emeritus:
Other Amount:
Advertisement
Advertisement
Free Classifieds
  • Sample of a Free Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Free Ad (without imag...
    [Read more]

  • Enjoy stunning views at half the rental rates

    Now Starting at just $3.60 psf per month, we have ...
    [Read more]

Readers Statistic
Latest Statistic