$735m surplus – increase uni fees; 41% foreigners?

I refer to the article “government should not keep two set of statistics on foreigners, something amiss” (likedatosocanmeh, May 10).

It states that “has the statistics on foreigners studying at local unis. Years ago, NUS staff statistics even had a breakdown by nationality. [ link ]

Out of 974 research staff, 464 or almost half were from PRC vs only 180 Singaporeans. Singaporeans form only 20% of the total number of research staff.  And why were there only 17 UK and 17 US research staff?

A top ranking NUS only able to attract hundreds of research staff from a communist third-world country?

From the above table, we can see just how embarrassing it must have been for … to shoot itself in the foot. And of course, similar statistics are no longer published.

Statistics on foreign students are being concealed by … local unis even though they are obligated to disclose to the public”.

I clicked on the link in the above article to the NUS annual report 2016.

$735m & $52m surplus in 2015 & 2016?

The surplus for the year in 2015 and 2016 was $734.8 and $52.1 million, respectively.

Fees increase every year since 2010?

In this connection, according to the article “Breaking down Uni tuition fees in Singapore” (The New Paper, Jun 9, 2016) – “Local universities have been increasing their tuition fees for their undergraduate courses every year since 2010”.

Since the surplus for 2015 and 2016 was $734.8 and $52.1 million, respectively – why was there a need to increase fees?

No breakdown for faculty & students?

Like what likedatosocanmeh wrote – I was also unable to find any breakdown of the faculty into nationalities or students into Singaporeans and non-Singaporeans.

NUS has 32% international students?

In this connection, the percentage of international students at NUS is 32 per cent, according to Times Higher Education?

41% non-S’porean students?

Do these international students include PRs?

If not, if we assume that the percentage of PR students is about the same as the about 13.3 per cent of the local population – the percentage of PR students may be about 9 per cent (68 per cent x 0.133)?

So, does it mean that the percentage of non-Singaporean students is about 41 per cent (32 + 9)?


Leong Sze Hian

Sponsored Content

9 Responses to “$735m surplus – increase uni fees; 41% foreigners?”

  • Rabble-rouser:

    Simple arithmetic! Local university students & their parents are generously subsidizing their 41% foreigner cohorts at university. In addition, the govt is cross-subsidizing & funding foreign tertiary students with revenue raised from various local sources eg. HDB (Flat prices), LTA (COE, ERP), SWF (CPF) etc. What else is new?

    GD Star Rating
  • Ho Lee Jing:

    Let’s hope that whoever has hacked NUS & NTU systems recently will reveal the 2 Unis shameless hidden statistics to us.

    What a bunch of traitors! Unless the ones heading these Unis are foreigners, there’s no reasons sporeans should betray sporeans in such manners. Shame on these idiots. They better be prepared to answer to their creator sooner or later.

    GD Star Rating
  • I Am Tony Tan Jiak Liao Bee:

    The Unis have been increasing fees through the years from the Locals to feed and house and provide free tuition for the Foreigners ???

    WTF !!!!

    GD Star Rating
  • Aussie uni grad:

    My uni fees back then for one foreign student supporting five local Aussie students.

    No wonder Aussie uni loves foreign students like me lol

    GD Star Rating
  • Amos was right:

    Amos was right in “attacking” LKY and PAP. They have betrayed Singaporeans with their pro-alien policies.

    GD Star Rating
  • Scholars:

    Mark Zuck, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, Robin Li, Jeff Bezo, Mike Dell all are not scholar.
    In SG, we muz make sure all SCHOLARS have good job and good promotion path.
    Come Uni, you see scholars doing MAINTENANCE work and we muz WORSHIP THEM.
    Believe PAP u better B DEAD.!!

    GD Star Rating

    Talk 3, talk 4, gahmen is simply skirting round the issue, will never ever commit, will never be specific, will refuse to count only true-blues as locals, will always want PRs lumped together as residents/locals. Will in the ultimate analysis, just blatantly say it is not in the public interest to disclose the real figures. So what are you going to do about that? KPKB? Complain to the UN?

    GD Star Rating
  • etc. etc. etc. etc. and etc.:

    Mark Zuck, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, Robin Li, Jeff Bezo, Mike Dell all are not scholar.

    That is why they all will be bypassed for promotion under the PAP reward system in favor of the likes of Lim Swee Say, Grace Fu, Josephine Teo, Desmond Quek, etc. etc. etc. etc. and etc.

    Now you understand why SG is heading for the drain?

    GD Star Rating
  • Taxi Uncle Lim Kopi:

    Of course SG is heading for the drain. You should go and see the nationalities of the PhD students. Less than 5% are Singaporeans.

    Recently there was this scheme for alumni to take free or subsidized courses. But what if the fella graduated from overseas universities? No chance at all?

    Do they know why Singaporeans don’t want to work as researchers? Because there is no prospect! Nowadays the funding is only one or two years. Then after that go where? Ownself eat ownself and you need to look for a job again. I might as well drive Uber which at least gives me a consistent income to feed my family.

    Don’t listen the garment that they don’t look at grades. They are still looking at grades. My brother works in a university and he got to know a 38 year old phd student who got kicked out of university because he failed only one course which affect his gpa grades. he cannot retake. this fello is apparently technically better than most of the inexperienced young peers from china because he had been in the mechanical manufacturing indstry for many years. he even paid for his own tuition fees (while his peers have scholarship).

    That’s that. We are still back to square one. We are still producing young and inexperienced phds for other countries, which does not add much value to Singapore.

    Seriously…I worry for our education system.

    GD Star Rating

Leave a Reply

 characters available


Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement

Most Recent Comments
  • hey not right: wasn’t st reported trump phoned up dead harry sonny and invited to wh just recently or was it a...
  • Harder Truths: Wishing all our Singaporean Muslims Selamat Hari Raya Adilfitri
  • Please go: A good leader is one who truly cares about the organisation he is serving and would be willing to resign...
  • Pink Noise: But the shit times didn’t compare with Jakarta public transport which is nearer to home. A 50 km...
  • KNN: STI gives roughly 3% dividends per annum. If re-invested then the real return will improve to 2.7% p.a. for past...
  • Boh BIAN: Joe Wong: You are mistaken on so many things. Firstly, many Singaporeans are leaving the country and...
  • Elite Singaporean: NS do R&D consider VIP or not?
  • Elite Singaporean: R&D is also very hard life yunnow.
  • reminder to the 70%: wishing someone will steal PM’s lunch . Same goes for most of the other ministar yesmen....
  • Monyet Hitam: PM Lee always use his kakis to do damage control on his behalf, while hiding behind to pull strings....
  • victor: TRE must do a proper check on these numbers. many new Citizen, went back to their home country after renting...
Support TR Emeritus
Support TR Emeritus:
Other Amount:
Free Classifieds
  • Sample of a Free Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Free Ad (without imag...
    [Read more]

  • Sample of a Premium 4 Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Premium 4 Ad (can upl...
    [Read more]

Readers Statistic
Latest Statistic