Chee Hong Tat’s criticism of Dr Paul Tambyah: 3,404 non-S’porean doctors – 8% earning ‘low pay’?

Mr Chee Hong Tat

Chee Hong Tat criticises Paul Tambyah

I refer to the article “Chee Hong Tat criticises Paul Tambyah over allegations” (Straits Times, May 13).

It states that “Senior Minister of State for Health Chee Hong Tat has criticised Professor Paul Tambyah, a senior infectious diseases consultant, for remarks he made about what junior doctors are told when they complain about their work.

Prof Tambyah, who works at the National University Hospital (NUH) and is a member of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party, had said at a May 1 forum that the doctors “say that every time they complain about conditions in the public hospital, they are told, ‘Oh you know, complain lah, you know we can hire somebody from South or South-east Asia who is willing to work for $3,000 a month‘”.

He also said: “Even in my own field, the junior doctors tell me this and I don’t know how true it is.”

Prof Tambyah made the remarks when he was speaking about how the lack of a minimum wage was affecting junior doctors. A minimum wage would level the playing field, he added at the event, which was organised by, a group offering support for the unemployed.

Yesterday, Mr Chee said in a Facebook post that Prof Tambyah, as a senior doctor, should have verified the truth and raised the problem.

Instead of clarifying the facts with the junior doctors or surfacing his concerns to the management, he chose to repeat unsubstantiated allegations at a public conference. I find it disturbing that as a senior doctor, Prof Tambyah does not see anything wrong with this behaviour,” he added.

Mr Chee asked Prof Tambyah for details about who made the remarks and what they said so that the ministry could look into the matter.”

“Get real” – name the allegators?

I was quite amused when I read the above – surely we are not expecting the junior doctor(s) “who made the remarks” to be named?

“What they said so that … “?

As to “what they said so that the ministry could look into the matter” – isn’t what they said already stated – “complain lah, you know we can hire somebody from South or South-east Asia who is willing to work for $3,000 a month”?

Simple answers to the questions?

Perhaps the answer to these questions may simply be to confirm the following:

… are foreign qualified doctors from typically the Philippines, India and Myanmar employed as clinical associates at $3,000 a month?

… do they perform some of the duties that junior doctors do, like seeing local adult patients at the polyclinics?

… what is the starting pay of a junior Singaporean doctor? Is it $4,500? In this connection, according to the NUS Graduate Employment Survey – the median basic salary of a medical graduate is $4,500.

As to “He also addressed the issue of temporary registration, which Prof Tambyah did not mention. But the issue was raised in an article on his speech by socio-political website The Independent, which criticised the Singapore Medical Council for allowing in doctors from medical schools not recognised here, by giving them temporary registration.

How many non-S’porean doctors?

Mr Chee said foreign doctors who are under temporary registration make up less than 4 per cent of the doctor population in public hospitals. He said this is granted for training and for visiting experts, and similar arrangements exist in the United States, Britain and Australia. Mr Chee said: “While these doctors may supplement the hospital’s workforce during their temporary stint in Singapore, they are not here to replace or compete with our local doctors.”” – what is the percentage of doctors (including foreign clinical associates) in the public hospitals who are non-Singaporeans?

3,404 non-S’porean doctors in the public hospitals?

In this connection, according to the Singapore Medical Council’s annual report – there were 3,404 non-Singaporean medical practitioners in Singapore’s public hospitals.

How many “low pay” foreign doctors?

Also, since there were 299 foreign doctors under temporary registration (service) (the 4% cited above which includes as I understand the foreign clinical associates who form the bulk of them) – how many more have eventually become permanent residents (PRs)?

So, is it possible that the actual number may be more than 4 per cent, if we include those who become PRs?

8% of non-S’porean doctors are “low pay”?

Whilst the 299 foreign doctors under temporary registration may apparently form only 4 per cent of the total number of doctors in the public hospitals – they are about 8.8 per cent of the total number of non-Singaporean doctors, which is arguably not an insignificant percentage (of “low pay” ($3,000?) foreign doctors) – which is the primary issue at hand.

My word against yours?

With regard to “When contacted yesterday, Prof Tambyah said his comments “are not untrue” and can be substantiated in several doctor chat groups. He added that he had raised the issue with the administrator in question “dozens of times”, but to no effect.

Mr Chee also criticised Prof Tambyah for saying The Independent had misrepresented him. He said he had heard a recording of Prof Tambyah’s speech and found the report accurate.

Who has erred?

Prof Tambyah said he was misrepresented as he was referring to a hospital – not NUH – and not the entire public healthcare system. The Independent had reported: “Junior doctors had told him that every time they complain about conditions in public hospitals, the administrators don’t seem perturbed by it.”” – does this mean that Prof Tambyah is correct and both The Independent and the Minister may have erred?

“Not see anything wrong”?

In the final analysis, arguably – do you “not see anything wrong with this (who’s) behaviour”?


Leong Sze Hian



Sponsored Content

12 Responses to “Chee Hong Tat’s criticism of Dr Paul Tambyah: 3,404 non-S’porean doctors – 8% earning ‘low pay’?”

  • rukidding:

    To Mr Chee Hon Tat… about allowing TRE to conduct a survey ?

    No names required .

    I guess, you won’t realy want to know the truth to be known to the public right ?

    GD Star Rating
  • DavidLKSee:

    Popular Internet Joke:

    Why do so many of our Million-dollar Ministers have “CHEE” in their names eg Teo CHEE Hean, Heng CHEE How and CHEE Hong Tat ???

    Because they are all clueless/hopeless CHEE B** Politicians !!!

    GD Star Rating
  • Ho Lee Jing:

    Another arrogant and jiak liao bee “yes-man” minister! He wants to know who made the remarks and what they said? So that the ministry could look into the matter? And then? Make them apologise like what happened to Donald Luck?

    Smart sporeans will know we can trust Prof Tambyah but never the wolf in WHITE sheep’s clothing.

    GD Star Rating
  • Never trust PAP:

    Mr Chee can easily find out on his own if what Paul Tambyah said is true. If necessary he can even use ISD (controlled by PAP) to verify what Paul Tambyah said. Instead, he attacks Paul Tambyah. Another case of “do not like the message so kill the messenger”. How pathetic.

    Amos was right about PAP. It cannot be trusted. His victory in US court proves it.

    GD Star Rating
  • opposition dude:

    Well what Dr Tambyah said isn’t untrue what. There are already more than a million non Singaporeans on the island, surely a good percentage of them are in every sector by now, it’s just common sense talking.

    Why is Chee so defensive about something that is an open secret? All we have to do is find out what percentage of doctors are non Singaporean and what the average pay is for them. Let the numbers speak for themselves lah.

    It’s the same when PAP wants to make soemthing sound less severe they say something like “The alien influx only grew by 1.3% last year” with no numbers for comparison at all. Pretty smart way to report right?

    GD Star Rating
  • Sperm whale sperm:

    Did his papa or mama gave him that name?

    GD Star Rating
  • the cost of plp:

    Plp get recommended and get a job. BUT plp no stop and gotvon the wrong side of bas***d threats apology insincere. Promise not to stop plp instead more and plp until bast feels siok. Worth or not no backboned prof. when minus an F what is the diff from a pros at least a pros has integrity pleasure for dols and no string attach.All prof rem lose your ball u should be there. Sin u student remember a balless prof teaching u is not only insult but despicable. U never be anything but will be condemn for life the next plp of scumbags

    GD Star Rating
  • LIONS:

    then again,can SMOS CHEE also deny this?

    i heard ministers,SM,MM N PM say that MINISTERS ARE UNDERPAID even though they are paid more than POTUS,PRESIDENT OF PROC AND EVEN NAJIB(except for 1MDB?) just across the causeway?

    well,what does chee ht say to this?

    GD Star Rating
  • Chee Boy:

    many would rather have 1 Dr Chee than 3 blardy useless white Chee Boys in parliaments!

    GD Star Rating
  • Let's Have A Live Debate?:

    No point critising each other in social media.

    Let the two debate it out on live tv.

    CNA running out of good programmes.

    Just Do It!

    GD Star Rating
  • NotMyProblem:

    This is how PAP works, as long as they dispute you with some excuses, the problem is solved by sweeping it under the carpet.

    It was the same when WP asked about the Elected President in Parliament, PAP challenged WP to go court for the answer.

    In this case, it is like the police asking the victim, “Give me the thief, otherwise you cannot report a theft”.

    GD Star Rating
  • Tatman:

    See? Jason Chua of FAP attacking SDP like a mad dog.

    GD Star Rating
Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement

Most Recent Comments
  • No Worries!: One cannot hide the truth! MS Carlson Turner, the intern at SDP will provide the true story to NY Times!
  • Ah Fah: The Ambassador is correct mah. This is how Mr Low acted as the goalkepper in the Parliament: ‘Mr Lee...
  • Telling Half Truths?: Is this is the standard of our Ambassadors? Shameful indeed!
  • Titiana Ann Xavier: SG Ambassador Ashok to Uncle Sam was telling blatant fibs. By conveniently leaving out the role...
  • Con u eat shit: GIC have openly admitted that their returns for the next decade will be about 2-3 percent.When they...
  • Uncle Lim: Arse Hole!
  • 70% disagree: In the first place why bother to rebut when i raise the fact that 70% disagree. Yeah sure , using...
  • Amos humiliate L*L and PAP: This again confirms that PAP CANNOT BE TRUSTED. Its speciality is telling misleading...
  • Uncle's million dollars dogs: Li Shengwu rightly called them “my uncle’s DOGS” in his FB comments!...
  • Rabble-rouser: To Go Out On a Limb! – the Global markets are beginning to turn down; the buoyant credit cycle...
  • Pink Noise: I don’t think the AG dares to investigate pinky for abuse of power. Its beginning to look like the...
  • Lucien Tao: I, Lucien Tao, want to apply for president. I no Hsien Tao. I Lucien Tao.
  • cobra versus cobra all snakes: Kishore backed by Dr Yap Kwong Weng & Marcus Loh, and Kausikan by K Shanmugam. it...
  • Expose them: If she wants to know sg, show the contrast local news makes with international news medias from China,...
  • opposition dude: Yet another creative accounting report from GIC so what else is new? Will be interesting to see how...
  • Rabble-rouser: - Cont’d - At least Thai people could reflect on their shortcomings, the founder of...
  • shakiness of judiciary Institu: Artful dodger: Hope they make an example of him.No one should get away with...
Support TR Emeritus
Support TR Emeritus:
Other Amount:
Free Classifieds
  • Sample of a Premium 4 Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Premium 4 Ad (can upl...
    [Read more]

  • Sample of a Free Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Free Ad (without imag...
    [Read more]

Readers Statistic
Latest Statistic