Singapore and Guantanamo

The whole world knows about prisoners in Guantanamo. Few however know about a high security prison in Singapore where prisoners suffer the same fate as those in Guantanamo. They are detained indefinitely without trial with many tortured and unknown.

According to Wikipedia there were 779 prisoners in Guantanamo since 2002 (the year it was established). Nearly 200 were released since mid 2004. President Obama promised to close down the prison but failed to do so before he left the presidency. Today there remain 41 prisoners. Several prisoners who were released and returned home have successfully sued their governments for having to undergo inhumane treatment in Guantanamo. A few committed suicide in Guantanamo.

Singapore’s Guantanamo was established in 1948 when the British empowered themselves by enacting the Emergency Regulations soon after World War 2. Interestingly, while enacting such laws in all her colonies, Britain removed similar laws which they enacted just before the war broke out. The government was sued by several detainees during the war and though their causes were lost, it probably resulted in the repeal of those laws shortly before the war ended.

The Emergency Regulations contain draconian powers for the government which inevitably led to abuse. The acting colonial secretary Andrew Gilmour boasted of several thousand houses being searched and people dragged to the police station and thrown into prison. We do not know how many were incarcerated during those days which people (most of them do not speak English) called the days of “white terror”.

The Emergency Regulations morphed into the Preservation of Public Security Ordinance (PPSO) under the Marshall government (1955). This law contained some safeguards. The appeal tribunal which consists of three judges was empowered to order the release of prisoners without the interference of the government.

But in 1959 when the PAP came into power, it swiftly removed the power of the judges. The appeal tribunal was removed and replaced by a toothless board which exists to this day. The brilliant prime minister Lee Kuan Yew ensured that judges will lend credibility to the board. He appointed one high court judge to the board. The colonial office minutes had this interesting note when the amendment bill was read in the legislative assembly:

“So apparently when anyone is picked up under the Ordinance now he is like a prisoner in the Bastille and so far as I can see nobody, not even the Internal Security Council, can get him out again unless the Singapore government chooses.” (If you would like the details, read “The 1960 Operation Coldstore in Singapore, Commemorating 50 Years” edited by Poh Soo Kai, Tan Kok Fang and Hong Lysa.)

The PPSO morphed into the Internal Security Act (ISA) when Singapore joined Malaya to form Malaysia in 1963. When Singapore was ejected from Malaysia, the PAP enacted even more drastic amendments to the ISA. Judges are now dismissed from adjudicating on arrests under the ISA. There is no judicial review in ISA cases. So anyone who believes and brags about Singapore abiding by the Rule of Law is just kidding himself. There is no rule of law in Singapore. This is the reality. And the sooner we get out of this dreamland, the better it is for our country. If we have the rule of law, we wouldn’t have prisoners like Dr Chia Thye Poh and Dr Lim Hock Siew who spent 32 years and 20 years respectively in jail without trial.

While the United States reject detention without trial on her soil and have to use Cuba to cover up her nefarious activities, Singapore announces to the world that its Internal Security Act is the law that ensures national security and that the government believes in the rule of law. It is really a cruel joke.

No one knows how many people the government has imprisoned since 1959. We are told by Minister Teo Chee Hean that 2460 were detained for the period 1959 to 1990. The Ministry of Home Affairs issues occasional press releases advising on the number of people arrested or released. These numbers are unreliable. For example, a person who has been arrested and detained for 30 days are not included in the computation of ISA prisoners.

Singaporeans are trusting of their government and really don’t care about the number of people arrested or imprisoned under the ISA. They labour on the naïve belief that they will never be victims of this law. Those detained in 1987 too did not anticipate that they would be victims under this law. Many don’t even know that such a law exists!

And this is where I strongly recommend all of you to buy a copy of “1987 Singapore’s Marxist Conspiracy, 30 Years On” which contains essays of survivors of the 1987 arrests as well as their families and friends. This book will be launched on Sunday, 21 May 2017 at The Projector. (You can register your attendance here.) 

So while you can hope that you will never be arrested under the ISA, I think it is wise to know and to be prepared for such an eventuality if you are a person who cares about yourself, your family and your fellow citizens!

While there are 41 prisoners in Guantanamo today, Singapore has according to the ministry, 17 prisoners. The table below is what I have tracked. I may be slightly off the mark though.Three of these prisoners have been in prison for 15 to 16 years. Like prisoners of the past who were called communists, pro communists, terrorists and Marxists, these 17 have also been called all sorts of names – lone wolves, ISIS, terrorists, JI etc.

It took the so called “Marxists” 30 years to publish “1987 Singapore’s Marxist Conspiracy”. Who knows if in another 30 years, those imprisoned after the bombing of the Twin Towers in September 2001 will write their books to deny the government’s allegations against them! After all, there was no trial and no one knows who they are and what they did.

So come to the book launch on Sunday, 21 May 2017. Read the book and challenge the editors and writers if you are not convinced of what is in the book.


Teo Soh Lung



Sponsored Content

6 Responses to “Singapore and Guantanamo”

  • Amos: 1 PAP: 0:

    Amos is smart he avoided Singapore’s “Guantanamo” (and NS) by getting asylum in the US. He also embarrassed the Lee family and PAP big-time. There will be even more embarrassment if US DHS does not / loses its appeal to US judge decision granting asylum to Amos.

    GD Star Rating
  • LIONS:

    i believe laws are made to maintaining order not to persecute people.

    GD Star Rating
  • Old Moon:

    Stop crying foul when you have been hoodwinked or unwittingly been made use of by someone to fight someone’s battle and agenda.
    Just too bad that you feel been unfairly treated or persecuted. Blame your own stupidity. The protagonist is untouchable overseas feeling saintly!

    GD Star Rating
  • Singaporean:

    The PM was not invited to Beijing…….Even his counter parts from Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines were there…. was the biggest gathering of head of states in China…….and he was not there.

    The beginning of the end of Singapore/China relationship……Sad.

    What does that mean with relations between Singapore and China.

    GD Star Rating
  • Old Moon:

    The beginning of the End of PAP!

    GD Star Rating
  • Dr Tan Tai Wei:

    LKY/PAP had boasted of being pragmatic and long-term planners, indeed “nation-builders”, ie. building a nation that would “survive” and outlast many generations, necessarily including outlasting leadership changes, etc. Now, pragmatism alone cannot be the basis of a great, humane people we aim to foster. Even so, it isn’t pragmatic to maneuver it such that the power-that-be can wield such absolute, uncheckable power. For a practical leader must know that even he himself isn’t infallible, and so should submit himself to “checks and balances”. In any case, he can’t live forever; so even should he be all-knowing, someone else would have to inherit the powers he had got for himself, and that one cannot be guaranteed to be all-knowing. So how could he, being pragmatic, allow those uncheckable powers he had gotten for himself be bequeathed to even those he appointed to succeed him as leaders?

    Teo Soh Lung and others of the 1987 “operation” are a case-in-point. Even Dhana, Tony Tan and Tharman had had reservations about the justice of their imprisonment under ISA. And, even assuming Chia Thye Poh and others were really “communist insurgents”, it surely hadn’t been necessary to keep them imprisoned so many years, very long after whatever “emergency” they caused had long been resolved, and Singapore, LKY boasted, had become very prosperous. So, we have, in all this, clear cases of abuse of uncheckable powers.

    GD Star Rating
Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement

Most Recent Comments
  • No Worries!: One cannot hide the truth! MS Carlson Turner, the intern at SDP will provide the true story to NY Times!
  • Ah Fah: The Ambassador is correct mah. This is how Mr Low acted as the goalkepper in the Parliament: ‘Mr Lee...
  • Telling Half Truths?: Is this is the standard of our Ambassadors? Shameful indeed!
  • Titiana Ann Xavier: SG Ambassador Ashok to Uncle Sam was telling blatant fibs. By conveniently leaving out the role...
  • Con u eat shit: GIC have openly admitted that their returns for the next decade will be about 2-3 percent.When they...
  • Uncle Lim: Arse Hole!
  • 70% disagree: In the first place why bother to rebut when i raise the fact that 70% disagree. Yeah sure , using...
  • Amos humiliate L*L and PAP: This again confirms that PAP CANNOT BE TRUSTED. Its speciality is telling misleading...
  • Uncle's million dollars dogs: Li Shengwu rightly called them “my uncle’s DOGS” in his FB comments!...
  • Rabble-rouser: To Go Out On a Limb! – the Global markets are beginning to turn down; the buoyant credit cycle...
  • Pink Noise: I don’t think the AG dares to investigate pinky for abuse of power. Its beginning to look like the...
  • Lucien Tao: I, Lucien Tao, want to apply for president. I no Hsien Tao. I Lucien Tao.
  • cobra versus cobra all snakes: Kishore backed by Dr Yap Kwong Weng & Marcus Loh, and Kausikan by K Shanmugam. it...
  • Expose them: If she wants to know sg, show the contrast local news makes with international news medias from China,...
  • opposition dude: Yet another creative accounting report from GIC so what else is new? Will be interesting to see how...
  • Rabble-rouser: - Cont’d - At least Thai people could reflect on their shortcomings, the founder of...
  • shakiness of judiciary Institu: Artful dodger: Hope they make an example of him.No one should get away with...
Support TR Emeritus
Support TR Emeritus:
Other Amount:
Free Classifieds
  • Sample of a Free Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Free Ad (without imag...
    [Read more]

  • Sample of a Premium 4 Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Premium 4 Ad (can upl...
    [Read more]

Readers Statistic
Latest Statistic