Security guards exempted from overtime limit?

I refer to the article “Basic pay for security officers to go up by $300 over next 3 years, limit on overtime hours” (Straits Times, Nov 23).

It states that “Security officers will be paid more while working fewer overtime hours each month in future.

They will see their basic pay go up by around $300 over the next three years, and also receive an annual increment of at least 3 per cent in the three years after that, under recommendations the Government accepted on Thursday (Nov 23).

In respect of “All security officers will be allowed to put in a maximum of only 72 overtime (OT) hours a month” – isn’t this just a marginal improvement from the current 95 hours?

As to “The current practice – in which security companies apply for OT exemptions so their employees can work past this limit – will be discontinued from 2021” – why must it take another three years to discontinue this “slave hours” work routine?

“The higher basic pay and subsequent annual increments are intended to offset the cap on OT hours.

Security agencies must adopt the new recommendations from Jan 1, 2019.

In June 2016, the median basic wage of full-time security officers was $1,300.

With the changes, security officers will see a total increase of $300 to basic monthly wages under the progressive wage model by 2021, and a total increase of $285 for those in senior ranks over the same period.

Wages should rise by $75 a month in 2019 and the same amount in 2020, followed by a $150 raise in monthly wages in 2021.”

As to “The STC said the higher increments are to ensure security officers’ gross wages will not be “adversely affected due to a reduction in overtime hours”” – does it mean that the gross wages may end up being the same as now – with the increment just offsetting the reduction in overtime wages?

With regard to “the security sector has the highest average weekly overtime per worker, according to a 2014 report by the STC, which first mooted removing OT exemptions in 2014. Security officers clock as many as 95 hours of overtime each month” – can you imagine working about 72 hours a week – every week – which I understand may be the norm.

Also, why are security officers in a sense being discriminated – by giving their industry this overtime exemption?

For how many years has this been going on? – And I believe this may never have been reported in the media.

Leong Sze Hian

Sponsored Content

8 Responses to “Security guards exempted from overtime limit?”

  • N.Jungne:

    Loong overdue – Wayang to buy support

    GD Star Rating
  • Focus on "over-paid":

    Instead of focusing on “over-time” it is better to focus on those that are “over-paid”. Top of the heap is the clowns in Cabinet – over-paid, incompetent and no accountability.

    GD Star Rating
  • Lye Khuen Way:

    Imagine doctors doing OT in the range of 90+odd hours per week!

    So, if Security Guards are deemed capable of not sleeping on the jobs and yet delivering the standard expected, I would expect our Members of Parliament and our Ministers and other Office Holders not to miss any Parliamentary Sessions and be seen to participate intelligently in all debates and proceedings.

    No, it’s physically not possible. Let’s get Real. And have a heart. The age of Slavery is supposed to be long over.

    GD Star Rating
  • Crazy hours and underpaid:

    Disappointed that the crazy work hours of 6 x 12 hours week is still allowed in Security Industry.Should practice 3 rotating shifts of 8 hrs to prevent fatigue and emsure SOs are alert to handle terror threat.

    Those in charge should try the long hours and understand the harm it does to the SOs.
    Many of them will have health problem in their later stage of their life from such long working hours week.
    The pay rise should have started in 2018 as SO are underpaid for such long working hours…

    GD Star Rating
  • Harder Truths:

    There will be no raise.

    They will be replaced by CCTV and other electronic gadgets. This is happening all over the world why not here?

    Remember Uber? Where is justice in $G for taci drivers now (even though they don’t deserve it – always voting for pappies KNNCCB)

    Those security guards willing to work will be given lower pay than present for the ‘sacrifice’ of the employer to take then on (out of the kindness of their hearts).

    Or else if they KPKB then can be replaced by a cardboard police man.

    We are all going to be replaced by robots very soon.

    GD Star Rating
  • Sad State:

    The Security Industry sad state of affairs for SOs with excessive overtime (long hours) and underpay is set to continue ….
    Maybe it is time to replace those involved with decision making for the Security Industry …

    GD Star Rating
  • nathan:

    Have Gun Will Travel.

    Paladin, Paladin where do you roam?

    Paladin, Paladin, far far away from home…

    Security Guards are called Ang Pai boh Cheng.

    GD Star Rating
  • Bad deal for SOs:

    The deal work out is not that meaningful.It does not help the sad state of affairs for the SOs here.
    Too little too late…such long hours for miserable pay…

    GD Star Rating

Leave a Reply

 characters available

Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement

Most Recent Comments
  • Dont be so vile: He’s a disgrace. After all the hardwork put in by the good people going out of their way to...
  • Bye bye: No love lost. Go lah, go… Sure to ‘step down due to health reasons’.. actuallt PAP will...
  • 鸟龙的人: 陈大婶: 就是说九九年租期 ? 干嘛要付产业税呢 ? 因为"利光要"样样都要嘛! 在外国是免税的,除了出租才須付所得税。
  • oxygen: DR TAN CHENG BOCK IS NOT WRONG when he said – that Singapore’s political system has created an...
  • Haigen Daiz: The first en-bloc owners are already paid. Money in bank already. So no problem even if Chinese...
  • Purpose of HDB: Purpose of HDB is just to make sure Singaporeans will defend Singapore, so a leased flat is branded...
  • oxygen: @ Ong PC You made en bloc deals like a walk in the park. If the buyer/developer is a top Singapore listed...
  • bgkl: A liar to the grave…call himself a “Singapore watcher”…for whose benefit? May his ashes...
  • doggie: He would retire before next GE. gong gong sinkies will be pleased and continue to vote pee n pee. After next...
  • doggie: Yes. 69.9% daft sinkies will kpkb but they were too afraid of the unknown so they will keep voting for the...
  • TUCK WAN: 69% Dafts will disagree. I am 100% agree.
  • S$8 Bypass Man Blame God: When he runs out of excuses, he unwisely blame God for the lightning striking the MRT train...
  • The Rot Start From The Top: This country is ruled by a regime comprises of politicians that is no different from...
  • C'est la vie: ***** In truth, not only are they daft; do include what further completes, the undeniable dna of all...
  • Smart Nation, Unwise Leaders: What the use of being a smart nation with all the latest IT gadgets and software when...
  • Bystander: IF you wanna get rid of military culture at GLCs, then you have to get rid of those at the Cabinet level...
  • Rabble-rouser: No mistakes, no human failings – no possibility of success! Only by making repeated mistakes...
Support TR Emeritus
Support TR Emeritus:
Other Amount:
TRE Classifieds
  • Sample of a Free Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Free Ad (without imag...
    [Read more]


    Are You In Need Of A Private Or Business Loans At ...
    [Read more]

  • Outdoor Furniture for Balcony Singapore

    Are you waiting for furniture sale in the Singapor...
    [Read more]

  • Sample of a Premium 4 Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Premium 4 Ad (can upl...
    [Read more]

Readers Statistic
Latest Statistic