MOE needs to (unfairly) protect itself from competition?

If even the venerable Ministry Of Education needs unfair competition against the private sector – what kind of message are we sending to the private sector and entrepreneurs in Singapore?

I refer to the article “Private pre-schools worry about new P1 admission policy” (Straits Times, Nov 29).

It states that “Some private pre-school operators are watching the changes in the sector with concern, after the Ministry of Education (MOE) announced on Monday that children in its kindergartens would get priority admission in the Primary 1 registration exercise.

Smaller players are worried about being squeezed out as MOE expands its reach and adds an advantage to attending its kindergartens, though MOE said the move is to better ease children into Primary 1 education.

Under the new rules, children in its 12 kindergartens will be allowed to apply for places in the primary schools whose premises the kindergartens share, under Phase 2A2 of the registration scheme, which now applies to children whose parents or siblings were former pupils but are not in the alumni association.

“This will put private schools which are not affiliated with any primary school at a disadvantage,” said Ms Kelly Chua, principal of Appleland Playhouse, a childcare centre with 170 children.”

This is obvious and blatantly unfair competition, and discrimination against the private sector.

As to “Appleland in Telok Blangah might feel the heat from the MOE kindergarten in Blangah Rise, whose children will get priority admission to Blangah Rise Primary. Parents of children who are eligible for admission in later phases than 2A2 might feel pressured to move them to MOE kindergartens, said Ms Chua” – some children may suffer the trauma of moving to a new school and parting with their schoolmates.

With regard to “MOE entered the pre-school sector in 2014, with the goal of raising the quality of early childhood education here. The kindergartens will charge $160 a month from next year, up from $150 now, and take in 60 to 120 children each. This can go up to 160 if there is demand.

By 2023, MOE hopes to have 50 kindergartens located in primary schools and offering 14,000 places – enough to cater to a fifth of all Singaporeans and permanent residents aged five and six. There are about 450 kindergartens here now, with a median monthly fee of about $170” – by this action of unfairly giving a competitive advantage to itself – the end result may be complacency, and a stifling effect on the growth and quality of the private sector.

Unfair competition is not new, as it used to be that the subsidies could only be used in two public sector-linked childcare groups.

In respect of “Dr T. Chandroo, chief executive of pre-school chain Modern Montessori International, which has two centres in Sengkang, said the new policy would affect all private operators in the long run as more MOE kindergartens come up.

“Instead of being able to play a pivotal role in the child’s life in his formative years from birth till six years of age, there is a likelihood that parents may leave our centre after the nursery programme for the MOE kindergarten,” he said, adding that private operators may become centres for just children aged up to four.

Dr Timothy Chan, director of SIM Global Education’s academic division, noted that early childhood education was a key part of the National Day Rally speech given by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who announced plans to invest in pre-schools and ramp up places for young children.

“The role of the state stepping in is to level the playing field from the beginning and provide an education experience that can be enjoyed by many people without them having to pay hefty fees that some private pre-schools charge,” he said, adding that private pre-schools must find “new value propositions” to keep parents going to them” – what this issue may highlight is the current and historical presence of unfair policies and practices in so many areas in Singapore.

For example, the parachuting of high-ranking military men to the private sector with argubly so many examples of disastrous outcomes.

The protection of our politicians from “real” criticism by a 151st Press Freedom Ranking media.

Well, the joke may be on MOE, because despite all its resources – why does it need to compete unfairly?

In the final analysis – this may be yet another message that we seem to keep sending to the private sector that it may be harder to succeed in Singapore. The general feeling may be that Singaporeans are generally lacking in creativity and entrepreneurship – thanks to unfair competition from the public or quasi-public sector.

Uniquely Singapore!


Leong Sze Hian



Sponsored Content

12 Responses to “MOE needs to (unfairly) protect itself from competition?”

  • Harder Truths:

    Since when did a government body NOT need to (unfairly) ‘protect’ itself from competition? Not that I can recall.

    Make no mistake – MOE is a government body that needs to maximise profit by whatever means necessary.

    GD Star Rating
  • Rats can't vomit:

    As expected from this insidious government, preferring to brainwash kids via their own pro government pre-school nursery and kindergartens, backed by these mercenary pre-school teachers trying to protect their own rice bowl. If only the the majority would see through the facade of this insidious government..

    GD Star Rating
  • LIONS:

    why shud they be afraid of the competition when they boastfully chastise more common sgs to face FT competition?

    why so lousy even with TWO,not one,MINISTER$?

    oh,btw,why shud MOE n its agents be making PROFITS at all?

    our govt agencies are always trying to MAKE MORE PROFIT$ rather than try to improve on PUBLIC SERVICE???


    MEDICAL TOURISM IS KILLING US and the MOH minister SON-OF-A-GAN says they are looking to put up a more transparent fees recommendation list for all medical procedures?




    WTF IS THIS SON-OF-A-GAN talking about???

    where is the sincerity???????????????????????????????????????????????

    GD Star Rating
  • Boo Lee Party:

    The motive is to force parents to send their children to MOE kindergartens so that the white party can continue to brainwash the future generation that WHITE is best.

    How is this move by MOE different from PAP wards getting priority in HDB upgrading programmes?

    This country is doomed unless people wake up to vote out the bullies.

    GD Star Rating
  • qwery:

    Good Ah . . say got mandate ma . .

    running time . . . manifesto quite quite . .

    slogan say > do you good you . ..

    then kenna 70% . . say got mandate liao . .

    can do whatever not said in manifesto ..

    GD Star Rating
  • Boh Kia See:

    This policy of ramping up early childhood education is aimed at the PAP kindergartens.

    It is simply illogical for the PAP to be operating a for-profit kindergarden and also hold the levers of power to supervise that sector. This is only one area where there is a conflict of interest. There are many such instances littered around other aspects in the governance of the island.

    Why should a political party be involved with operating a kindergarden?

    How to make policies that are for the good of the island when they have their own vested interest to look after?

    Singapore is doomed if citizens continue to entrench PAP as the ruling party. You got more freedom and better policies under the British colonial rule than you do under the PAP.

    So what is the purpose of being “independence”–is it to replace on colonial power witl local hoods?

    Time to wake up and question such principles becuase Singapore cannot survive like this for long.

    GD Star Rating
  • C'est la vie:

    Unchecked monopoly and unrestricted power …….. in all of its glory !!!

    GD Star Rating
  • Sickies Deserve It:

    Government linked companies cannot compete overseas, so have to compete with local SME in tiny Sinkieland with unfair advantages. So typical of PAP leadership, fxxking good for nothing leeches, overpaid for under performing.

    GD Star Rating
  • RDB:

    What has happened to PAP’s own Unfair Competition Act by law? They now got cold feet and again operate in communistic style to protect it’s own turf to groom more vulnerable into the their very own non-altruism and non-competition acts! Shame on you for yet again Peeing And Pooing for the whole world to see your kiasu kiasi mentality.

    GD Star Rating
  • just1more:

    With this rule, Kindergarten run by MOE will be fully booked since it is a parachute to good Primary Schools. Like that Chinese says “Win Already”. How not to make money?

    GD Star Rating
  • Ali baba:


    GD Star Rating
  • urgent drive for greedier plps:

    Greed, hunger and agressiveness keypoint in mew missions. Plps aren’t different if not taking the lead. More has to be staked up ready to feed the new hungry,hunger and extra aggressive pls to maintain their increase hunger thus greed.

    The olds lead the pack with the leading jait liao bi leading the pack. 大石头变了一小盤散沙。该到了大㣭的棺材本吧。官加个木吧枯了. 到終也变柴吧
    Yes the nig pulveriser is now rigging at all the coffin $ of the daft pgs.

    GD Star Rating

Leave a Reply

 characters available

Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement

Most Recent Comments
  • Dont be so vile: He’s a disgrace. After all the hardwork put in by the good people going out of their way to...
  • Bye bye: No love lost. Go lah, go… Sure to ‘step down due to health reasons’.. actuallt PAP will...
  • 鸟龙的人: 陈大婶: 就是说九九年租期 ? 干嘛要付产业税呢 ? 因为"利光要"样样都要嘛! 在外国是免税的,除了出租才須付所得税。
  • oxygen: DR TAN CHENG BOCK IS NOT WRONG when he said – that Singapore’s political system has created an...
  • Haigen Daiz: The first en-bloc owners are already paid. Money in bank already. So no problem even if Chinese...
  • Purpose of HDB: Purpose of HDB is just to make sure Singaporeans will defend Singapore, so a leased flat is branded...
  • oxygen: @ Ong PC You made en bloc deals like a walk in the park. If the buyer/developer is a top Singapore listed...
  • bgkl: A liar to the grave…call himself a “Singapore watcher”…for whose benefit? May his ashes...
  • doggie: He would retire before next GE. gong gong sinkies will be pleased and continue to vote pee n pee. After next...
  • doggie: Yes. 69.9% daft sinkies will kpkb but they were too afraid of the unknown so they will keep voting for the...
  • TUCK WAN: 69% Dafts will disagree. I am 100% agree.
  • S$8 Bypass Man Blame God: When he runs out of excuses, he unwisely blame God for the lightning striking the MRT train...
  • The Rot Start From The Top: This country is ruled by a regime comprises of politicians that is no different from...
  • C'est la vie: ***** In truth, not only are they daft; do include what further completes, the undeniable dna of all...
  • Smart Nation, Unwise Leaders: What the use of being a smart nation with all the latest IT gadgets and software when...
  • Bystander: IF you wanna get rid of military culture at GLCs, then you have to get rid of those at the Cabinet level...
  • Rabble-rouser: No mistakes, no human failings – no possibility of success! Only by making repeated mistakes...
Support TR Emeritus
Support TR Emeritus:
Other Amount:
TRE Classifieds

    WE OFFER LOAN AT 3 % APPLY NOW Do you need a Lo...
    [Read more]

  • fish gravy in singapore

    Fish Head Curry is the one of the most popular- Si...
    [Read more]

  • Sample of a Premium 4 Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Premium 4 Ad (can upl...
    [Read more]

  • Buy Outdoor Sofa Sets Sale

    Outdoor furniture also essential compare to indoor...
    [Read more]

Readers Statistic
Latest Statistic