What are the combined surpluses for MediShield Life and ElderShield?

I refer to the article “Why zero co-payments are a bad idea in health insurance” (Straits Times, Feb 1).

It states that “Health insurance requires a fine balance: too little overburdens patients; too much encourages overspending. Good insurance design retains co-payments and focuses on value-based care.”

$2.4b MediShield fund’s assets?

In this connection, according to the report on the “MediShield Fund“ – “As at end-2013, the Fund assets stood at $2.4 billion.

Over the past five years, on average, about two-thirds of the MediShield Fund comprised reserves to fund the expected scheme liabilities.

The remainder is capital which meets the same standards required of other insurers under the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)’s risk-based capital framework”.

What about the accrued % since inception?

In Table 1 – the insurance premiums of $372,132, 385,563. 404,732, 421,297 and $770,039 million, from 2009 to 2013, adds up to a total of $2,353,763 billion shown in the same table.

So, does the “Fund assets of $2.4 billion” include the interest that should normally accrue on the annual surpluses of premiums less claims, every year since the MediShield scheme started?

Surpluses before 2009?

Also, does the “Fund assets of $2.4 billion” include surpluses prior to 2009?

We have calculated from the table, that the claims to premiums ratio is 59 per cent (claims $1,395,382 billion divided by premiums $2,353,763 billion).

Most profitable scheme in the world?

Does this make MediShield the most profitable national health insurance scheme in the world?

Need 80% more?

Why would a national health insurance scheme that will insure 100 per cent of the population (including those not residing in Singapore) which has been made compulsory for every resident, need to have a capital adequacy ratio that is 80 per cent more than the expected minimum for private insurers?

Make actuarial report public?

Can the actuarial report for MediShield Life be made public?

The Government should spend more on healthcare to help Singaporeans.

By the way, are there any countries in the world, whereby the mandatory national health insurance scheme is apparently, making money?

$2.6b in premiums, $100m in claims

According to the article “Gan Kim Yong: $2.6 billion collected in premiums for ElderShield insurance and around $100 million paid out in claims since 2002” (theonlinecitizen, Feb 18, 2017)

– “from 2002 to end-2015, about $2.6 billion have been collected in premiums for ElderShield insurance and around $100 million have been paid out in claims, adding that about $130 million in premium rebates have been given to policyholders so far, the first tranche in 2007 and another in 2012.”

What is the accumulated interest (investment returns) on the excess premiums over the last 15 years? Will it increase the total excess premiums accumulated to over $3 billion?

So, does it mean that the combined surpluses of MediShield Life and ElderShield may be about $6 billion?

As to “Healthcare expenditures are steadily growing worldwide. Between 2004 and 2014, the World Bank reckons that the average share of health expenditures of high-income countries has increased from 10.9 to 12.3 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP). Singapore is no exception as its share of health expenditures has increased from 3.3 to 4.6 per cent between 2011 and 2015” – Singapore’s public healthcare  spending as a percentage of GDP, at just about 2.5 per cent ($9.8 divided by $400 billion), is probably the lowest in the world.


Leong Sze Hian



Sponsored Content

10 Responses to “What are the combined surpluses for MediShield Life and ElderShield?”

  • N.Jungne:

    GREED has no limit, only his Karma will.

    GD Star Rating
  • die:

    MediShake copay,the rest pay $$$
    MediShit go in then use…pay or not pay $$$ to make differences….pigs know only
    ElderSteam @30age
    Your guess….pls…for fiack pay…knnbccb….karma…pls wack those bastards…cPeeF not pupils $$$$ meh

    GD Star Rating
  • Good Q for Mdm President!:

    Singaporeans who did not vote for you need a favor.

    Let’s us know the answer please.

    No one beside you, will ever get an answer.

    Thanks in advance, Madam President.

    GD Star Rating
  • MediSave, MediShield, now E...:

    Now at Age 30, must pay ElderShield?

    What’s next?

    Singaporeans are already paying alot!

    Those RICH faces no problem, those low and middle-income kenna jialat jialat!

    Singaporeans better vote wisely at the next GE or else one day, maybe no CPF payout at Age 65 too!

    GD Star Rating
  • Regime change to get answers:

    The only way to get answers from the Government is to throw out the PAP at the next GE. “Clear the swamp”. VTO.

    GD Star Rating
  • LIONS:

    Medi$hit Lie?

    Yep,that’s *it*!

    GD Star Rating
  • Blgoa:

    There is no way pap would want to compromise their million dollars salaries for affordable public healthcare.

    Their unspoken principle is if you don’t have money when you fall sick that is your problem.

    How the daft 70% couldn’t see this is beyond comprehension.

    GD Star Rating
  • DOOM:



    GD Star Rating
  • Review premiums:

    People who had the good fortune(good health) of never ever having to use medisave or medshield, should receive some kind of rebate or pay lesser premiums.ca
    Im 61 and worked from age 17plus…till today ive never gotten seriously sick enough to have to be hospitalised or to utiluse my medisave/medishield.
    Just imagine the thousands of $$$myself n folks like me had been coughing up till now.
    Im thankful to my maker for my good health. I also do my part in keeping healthy.
    what say others?

    GD Star Rating
  • Change We Must:

    Yes, just show us layman the surpluses. Don’t have to give us round the bush answers.Maybe is their intention to confuse us and they jolly well that it is too “chim” for us to understand those scholastic answers.

    GD Star Rating

Leave a Reply

 characters available

Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Most Recent Comments
  • opposition dude: So this means that the election will be next year or 2020 before GST is upon us in 2021. By then we...
  • they dine at Din Tai Fung: how much nourishment is there: What or how much nourishment is there...
  • Well up to 70% now.: Well , up to 70% now.
  • opposition dude: The handing over has been bungled, just like how the MRT is always giving problems, the HDB lifts...
  • PAP is BEST: PAP best one, increase tax is good means Swiss Standard of Living is coming. Last time, PM Goh GST 3%...
  • N.Jungne: Heng Ah Keat has already said he has no benchmark and too troublesome, so this is a “Gasak Buta” budget....
  • Give more lah: Should give at least $1000 instead of $300 to be meaningful.
  • N.Jungne: HarderTruths: We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. Albert...
  • oxygen: OF COURSE IT IS FARKING WAYANG, 2017 budget gave up to $300 PER HOUSEHOLD as a special one-off relief for...
  • pap selected INDIAN president: The carbon tax will encourage businesses to take measures to reduce carbon...
  • pap selected INDIAN president: pap Ljs and pap Cbs please listen. your MFing group think is truly disastrous. carbon...
  • Nonsensical budget: Increasing rates everywhere , then they cunningly give us rebates n angpows ..for what? Makes no...
Support TR Emeritus
Support TR Emeritus:
Other Amount:
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic