Paul Tambyah: Budget Needs to Take Care of the Have-Nots

Good evening all,

I would like to thank Sze Hian and MARUAH for inviting me to speak at this event. Firstly I would like to clarify that I am speaking in my own personal capacity as an activist and politician and NOT as a representative of the University and the hospital. I hope that the Independent can take note of that as it causes problems for a lot of people when the different roles that we speak in are mixed up. The University has a very clear policy on public communications which recognises that “Academics are regarded by society as scholars and by tertiary students as role models, and should therefore balance freedom of expression with accountability to society. Faculty and staff members are generally free to express their views on a subject matter as long as they behave in a responsible manner, and it is clearly stated that these are their personal opinions, and not the official views of the University. In expressing personal opinions, faculty and staff members should refrain from stating their university affiliation”. I have been reassured by those in authority that I will be treated no different from other academic politicians such as Asst Prof Intan or Assoc Prof Janil Puthucheary and I would ask that you respect that.

Now I would like to get to the most important concerns I have to raise today. I would like to present three wishes for Budget 2018. I know that Finance Minister Heng Swee Kiat said that he is not Robin Hood nor Santa Claus but I am kind of hoping that he will be a genie and grant three wishes.

Healthcare

The first is in the area closest to my heart – healthcare. As I have mentioned on numerous occasions, Singapore has excellent healthcare with some of the finest doctors, nurses and allied health professionals in the world especially in our public hospitals. We have access to the most up to date technologies and drugs and some really modern facilities with state of the art equipment. However, our healthcare financing system is overly complex leading to many people being afraid of falling sick in Singapore. In response, the Medishield Life program was introduced after GE 2011 and soon after the SDP launched our Healthcare Plan in 2012. It is a strong step in the right direction in that it included individuals with pre-existing medical conditions including congenital illnesses who had previously been excluded from Medishield. The problem is that Medishield Life is still primarily a catastrophic health insurance policy but unlike other public catastrophic health insurance policies, it carries an annual cap on how much it will pay out. In countries such as the Netherlands or Taiwan which have state mandated national health insurance schemes, there is a cap on how much an individual has to pay with the state insurance taking care of the rest for those with truly catastrophic expensive illnesses. In contrast, with Medishield Life, while there is no lifetime cap, like commercial insurance policies, there is an annual cap on the payout by the insurer with the rest of the costs for very expensive treatments being borne by the individual. This has resulted in the sad spectacle of children and adults with rare diseases who require expensive treatments in excess of their annual Medishield Life claims limits resorting to crowdfunding through the various thriving online crowdfunding platforms. Singaporeans are very generous and many have given to support these individuals who need expensive medications to stay alive but I personally believe that having a child with a rare genetic disorder or cancer which does not respond to first or second line treatment should not force an individual to turn into an online beggar.

It is not just in the rare diseases with expensive treatments beyond the Medishield Life annual caps which are the problem. The co-payments and deductibles that come with Medishield Life are also very high. For an 81 year old staying in a C class ward, the first $2000 of the hospital bill is not covered by Medishield Life. Expenses above $2000 also carry a 10% co-payment and Medishield Life only covers inpatient costs and some very selected outpatient costs including chemotherapy, dialysis and some transplant medications. This means that for the vast majority of C class hospitalisations and outpatient treatments, individuals who have paid into Medishield Life are unable to claim for their treatments. The evidence for this comes from data provided by the Ministry of Health citing the CPF annual reports. These data show that for 2016, the total amount of money collected in premiums from Singaporeans was $1.858 billion. In contrast, the amount paid out was $745 million which would make Medishield Life much more like a commercial insurance scheme rather than a mandatory public insurance policy. The government challenges this approach by arguing ( LINK ).
“This approach is not a holistic representation as it omits a large part of what MediShield Life premiums are meant to support, namely future long-term claims and premium rebates.” I am not an insurance or financial planning expert like the other two speakers but no other public mandatory health insurance scheme in the world to my knowledge uses this method of calculating its incurred loss ratio.

The impact of restricting payouts in Medishield Life reduces the potential for Medishield Life to really make a difference in the health of Singaporeans. An example of what has worked is the one-off Pioneer generation package which greatly reduced the costs of primary healthcare for individuals who were classified as Pioneers. In contrast, Medishield Life with its restriction to hospital care and tertiary outpatient care has led to the paradoxical situation where people do not get the help that they need until it is too late. To give you an example, I recently visited a friend at a long term care facility and saw row after row of disabled Singaporeans who had had strokes. Many of them were in their fifties and sixties and many of them had been told some time before their stroke that they had an irregular heart rate or high blood pressure but they had not followed up on this because of the costs of medications or the lack of an integrated subsidized primary healthcare system that catered to working Singaporeans. The polyclinics do good work but they only cover 20% of primary healthcare in Singapore, the bulk of which is provided by private general practitioners. These individual GPs pay commercial rates for drugs, rental and equipment and have to recover costs from patients although most of them would often waive charges for poor patients. Apart from the very limited subsidies provided by the CHAS system, most people pay for their GP visits in cash or through their employers insurance as Medishield Life cannot be used for GP visits. The result is that irregular heart rhythms and high blood pressure are often inadequately treated until it is too late and a stroke occurs. The consequences of a stroke can be devastating. Despite the fact that Medishield Life will then kick in to cover the costs of inpatient stay, for the individual and the family, this is something which could and probably should have been prevented by more affordable and accessible primary healthcare.

The latest innovation we have heard about is the proposal to make Eldershield compulsory and to lower the age for contributions to 30. This is worrying as it suggests that the same metrics for calculating the loss ratio for Medishield Life are being applied to Eldershield. Indeed, according to the Straits Times of 1 Feb 2018 ( LINK ),
“In Parliament last year, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said $2.6 billion in ElderShield premiums was collected between 2002 and end-2015, and around $100 million was paid out in claims”. Personally, I think it would be simpler to just allow individuals to use their Medishield Life funds to pay for orthopaedic devices, diapers, wound care creams and other medical needs that disabled older Singaporeans would need.

So, my first wish is that Medishield Life be expanded to cover evidence-based healthcare interventions. I raised this at the IPS dialogue with DPM Teo Chee Hean last month and his response was to cite the classic neoliberal argument that if you provide free medical care, a “buffet table syndrome” will result. This means that individuals will get all kinds of diseases and treatments just so that they can enjoy the free medical benefits. This is not his fault, it is a widely held belief among health economists from various right wing think tanks primarily in the United States who have advanced this argument. To those of us who practice medicine on a daily basis, it is completely at odds with reality. There are some individuals who seek medical treatment when they do not really need it – they have a medical condition known as Munchausen’s syndrome which can actually be successfully treated. The rest of the people most doctors see everyday in the wards and clinics of our local hospitals do not want to be there. The happiest moments of my practice are when a patient shakes my hand and says “Thank you doc, I hope to see you again, but not in hospital!”. No one with cancer wants to get cancer or with a heart attack wants to get a heart attack just because his insurance provides free treatment for cancer or heart attacks. None of us chooses to get sick. Healthcare is a basic human right and the World Health Organization now recognises that truly universal healthcare is a fundamental human right. We have taken the first steps towards this with Medishield Life covering pre-existing medical conditions and congenital illnesses, we now need to move closer towards truly universal medical care where no one needs to go begging online to support their children’s healthcare expenses or ends up hospitalised for a preventable medical condition such as a stroke caused by an irregular heart beat.

Aging population

Don’t worry, my second and third wishes are a lot shorter! My second wish relates to the bogeyman of the elderly Singaporean. I hear a lot about how we have an ageing population in Singapore and the aged-dependency ratio is changing dramatically and that we have a demographic time bomb and other alarmist rhetoric. This annoys me tremendously mainly because firstly, it is not accurate. We do not have 200 and 300 year olds walking around the streets of Singapore demanding expensive social services. We do not even have 92 year old politicians trying to upset the political leadership succession plans for our country. What has happened in Singapore, just like in many other countries, is that social conditions and medical care have resulted in fewer people dying young. This means that more people are surviving to an older age which should be a good thing – something to be celebrated. The problem comes about when people are unhealthy regardless of their age. An unhealthy 50 year old with diabetes, kidney failure and an amputation, will need a lot more social and medical support than an 80 year old who runs marathons. The best news in recent weeks has been that the number of new dialysis patients has dropped for the first time in decades. While the authorities were rightly cautious about this, it may mean that the tide is finally turning and the incidence of chronic diseases will drop in older Singaporeans to levels closer to what middle aged Singaporeans are experiencing today. This is not wildly optimistic – in many developed countries, death rates from cancer have dropped across the board, dementia rates have also dropped. Indeed, there are some accurate data from Singapore which suggest that older people in Singapore, far from being a burden on society as some would paint them, are actually making significant contributions far in excess to the benefits that they receive.

The report “A Profile of Older Men and Women in Singapore 2014”, was prepared by the Tsao-NUS Ageing Research Initiative and the International Longevity Centre Singapore. Some striking findings included in the report are that 73% of older adults aged between 60 and 75 and 28% of those over 75 provided financial assistance to their children. Many middle-class Singaporeans now feel that they have to provide assistance to their adult children trying to make down payments for their first properties, something that was unheard of a generation ago. The other important piece of data in that report was the decreasing prevalence of chronic diseases in the very elderly – for example, while 31% of those 65-69 had diabetes, only 7% of those over 85 had diabetes. This is a phenomenon known as survivorship – in other words, individuals who live beyond 80 are actually probably healthier than many people in their sixties because of a combination of genetic, environmental and other factors. Thus, just because there are more 80 years olds now than there were 20 years ago does not mean that there are more unhealthy people around now. In fact, the opposite is more likely to be true. Furthermore, the older generation of Singaporeans ten years from now will be far more educated than our predecessors, thus giving us far more options in terms of careers and financial options. The one difference is that none of us will have pensions and we will have to depend on our CPF or our investments to keep us going as we start to make way for the younger generation and plan on enjoying the fruits of our labors. Basically, the sum of this argument is that older Singaporeans are not a burden. They already contribute significantly to their families, to society and our nation as a whole. With good primary care, they can live long and healthy lives and should not be used as an excuse for raising taxes to fund the very limited social support systems that we have here in Singapore. So my second wish is that the Minister of Finance does not use the excuse of “having fewer people dying young” for raising taxes on all of us.

Income inequality

My third and final wish is that the government will take serious steps to address the problem of inequality. Singapore is recognised as one of the most unequal societies in the developed world, similar to the United States or Hong Kong, and vastly different from the Scandinavian countries or Japan. This has a real impact on people as we can see from the data on population demographics. We know from Singapore’s report on the registration of births and deaths from 2015 (https://www.ica.gov.sg/cms/files/2015%20Annual%20RBD%20Report.pdf/) that the average age of death for a Chinese person in Singapore is 77, for Malays 70.3 and for Indians 68.0. This is different from life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth means that a baby born in Singapore today can expect to live to 83 years old. That is an outstanding public health achievement and the result of investment of huge amounts of resources in pediatric and obstetric care. The average age of death on the other hand refers to adults, not babies and thus the ICA data shows us that (and I quote directly from the report) “there are disparities in the average age at death among different ethnic groups. The AA for Chinese was 77.0 years compared with 70.3 years for Malays, 68.0 years for Indians and 66.3 years for other ethnic groups. The gap in AA between Chinese and non-Chinese ethnic groups existed in all major causes of death except diabetes mellitus.” No details of socio-economic status are provided but it is likely that a large part of the differences are due to socio-economic rather than racial factors. A study from Singapore’s Eye Research Institute published in the journal Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation in 2009 showed that within the Malay community, poorer health outcomes were independently associated with lower socio-economic status (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18685142). Thus inequality can be to a matter of life and death for poorer Singaporeans of all ethnic groups.

It has been argued that open free market trading economies such as Hong Kong, the United States and Singapore will inevitably have inequality far in excess of more closed societies such as Japan or Scandinavia. That may be true but in Singapore, public policy has a major role in reducing or exacerbating inequality. There is a lot that can be done.

To take the most obvious example – education. It is widely recognised that education is a pathway out of poverty and that good students who study hard and are given the opportunity have a chance to bring themselves and their families out of so-called poverty traps. There are many in Singapore in the Universities and others who have tried to address inequality by strengthening outreach programs to underrepresented groups. However, the best interventions are early. The pinnacle of Singapore’s early education system is the Gifted Education Program. Their website states clearly that “There are 2 main reasons for implementing the GEP in Singapore: The Educational Factor: It has been recognised that children have varying abilities and it is not a sound practice to give every child the same education and expect him/her to move at the same pace as his/her peers. The intellectually gifted need a high degree of mental stimulation. This need may not be met in the mainstream classroom and the gifted child may become mediocre, indifferent or disruptive in class. And The Socio-Political Factor

Singapore is a small nation with only human resources to rely on for its progress and prosperity. It is to the advantage of the nation that the gifted are helped and nurtured.”

While this does sound a bit elitist, the list of primary schools offering the GEP is even worse. There are nine primary schools offering the GEP in total, four of them, Catholic High School, Nan Hua Primary School, Nanyang Primary School and Tao Nan School do not offer Malay or Tamil as a second language effectively restricting access to a significant number of children. Of the remaining five schools, a quick check with the URA Space Map (https://www.ura.gov.sg/maps/#) and the Singstat table 152 of the General Household Survey of 2015 (http://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications-and-papers/GHS/ghs2015content)
shows an interesting distribution. Two of them – Henry Park Primary School and Raffles Girls Primary School are located in the Bukit Timah Planning Area where 44.3% of the resident households have incomes of more than $20,000 a month in comparison to the national average of 12.1% across the URA planning areas. One, ACS Primary is located in the Novena planning area which has 27.4%. Another, Rosyth School is in the Serangoon planning area with 21.3% of households in the highest income categories. Only St Hilda’s is located in a planning area closer to the national norm with only 9.5% of households in the Tampines area belonging to the highest income category. This economic segregation of elite primary schools provides well-to-do Singaporeans with additional help that they do not need. Don’t get me wrong, some of my best friends are from the GEP but I think its implementation needs to be adjusted especially at the primary school level.

Singapore’s taxation system is already extremely regressive. The highest taxes are paid by low wage work permit holders who contribute up to 40-50% of the money paid by their employers to various government levies. In Singapore, elderly Ah Pek’s and Ah Ma’s who have to pay GST on the medications that they buy from the Sinseh and on the water conservation tax that they pay in their homes. In contrast, a young person who inherits a fortune from his parents and has not worked a day in his life but simply pays some bright fund managers to invest the money to generate returns, who lives on a yacht, shops in Milan, Tokyo and Shanghai, pays no estate duty, no capital gains tax, very little GST, while at the same time enjoying taxpayer funded infrastructure, amenities, security and resources. Very few countries outside of city states such as Monaco do such transfers to the wealthy the same way that we do.

None of the people born into poor families I know in Singapore ask for a handout. They simply want a level playing field where they are given the same opportunities as other Singaporeans to work hard, do well and be recognised for their efforts. My third wish is for the government to do something to remove structural inequalities in Singapore.

So there you have it – three wishes – expand Medishield Life, stop using people who live longer as an excuse to increase revenues, and do something to remove the structural inequalities that prevent all Singaporeans from achieving our potential.

Paul Tambyah
Chairman
Singapore Democratic Party

 

 

Sponsored Content

18 Responses to “Paul Tambyah: Budget Needs to Take Care of the Have-Nots”

  • LIONS:

    Prof Paul,good to hear you speaking out for ordinary sgs like this simple old sg uncle yet again.

    You would have made a very good MINISTER OF HEALTH.
    What has COW BOON ONE done n what has GUN KIM YOUNGER done after him?

    I only see MEDICAL COSTS being allowed to escalate more n more n more!
    Govt hospitals shud not actively seek for MEDICAL TOURISTS at the expense of sick Sg Citizens by competing for limited medical resources n pushing out charges/costs.

    Medishield is sinply NO SHIELD for sgs especially jobless n needy seniors.
    By ADDINH HEFTY G$T to already costLEE medical bill$, the govt is making life miserable for many sgs.

    Happy Ageing is a $logan more than anything else.
    I want GST REMOVED FOR COSTLY MEDIC BILLS for the jobless n elderly.
    I want to see the govt BUILD RETIREMENT VILLAGES.
    With a govt target of 10 million people, OVERCROWDING IS A SOURCE OF RISK TO AGEING CITIZENS in so many ways,from compromised safety to inconveniences like getting injured from all the jostling n rushing about.

    Yes,rich are getting richer n so are our TOP PUBLIC SERVANTS,from PM TO MINISTERS TO PERM SECS N TLC SENIOR STAFFER$?
    Meanwhile,many families’ breadwinners lost their jobs to fake FTs.
    Coupled with negligible public assistances,many sgs can hardly make ends meet n still the greedy govt is thinking of rai$ing GST?

    Think its time to get in sgs like Paul into Parliament n we cannot wait till he turns 92???

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Hagen Daiz:

    Remember what Deputy PM Tharman had said in 2015 on the adequacy of revenue? Then followed by PM Lee’s retraction in 2017? Now, FM Heng says he is not ‘Robin Hood nor Santa’. Reminds me of an old nursery rhyme about three geese leaving a flock, “one flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest”
    Our Sheriff of Nottingham will be raising taxes, GST and duties on Feb. 19. After that, “throw all our seniors under the bus” for good measure.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • I Say:

    If the Have-Nots also Need-Not serve NS, then don’t need to worry too much about problem of inequality.

    If the Have-Nots also;
    Need-Not raise a child to serve NS
    Need-Not support a husband to server NS
    Need-Not stand by a father, brother while they are away to serve NS,

    then don’t need to worry too much about the problem of inequality.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • The Other Hard Truths:

    Yet another excellent piece by Dr Paul Tambyah. Men like him are the right kind of ministerial or even PM material.

    Governments exist to take care of their citizens, but horrifically in Singapore, the ruling party deems the citizens exist only for taking care of its needs — which by the way, are humongously insatiable.

    The PAP used to repeat ad nauseam that Singapore is a tiny Red Dot and there has to enact special laws and implement special policies that defy common sense in order to protect the country’s long-term viability and even survival.

    However the reasons put forth by the PAP fail to veil the actual evil behind them. The truth is that these acts are desperado attempts to “dig in” , meaning entrench itself in political power, so that the PAP can continue to do whatever it likes.

    Year after year, the government continues to suck in (actually “robbing” in euphemistic lingo) millions and billions from the people, while giving out “theatric” minute amounts while crowing from dawn to dusk.

    Money, in very large amounts, can do wonders. The PAP knows best about that. And the lack of it can cause extreme miseries, and the PAP knows best how to exploit that.

    If the people have more time, more energy and more money to spare, “they will have great tendency to indulge in motives that are rebellious and unfavorable” to the PAP. That is a truth.

    What the PAP is doing now is nothing short of “corralling” the people, per the likes of ranchers do to sheep, goats, cattle, horses, etc.

    Behind all the gleaming facades of shopping malls and high-rises, there is a creeping despair. The rich (aka government) is getting richer and the poor getting poorer, and the not-so-rich turning into poor.

    When one has to contend with a shoe-box or pigeon apartment that
    *cost half-a-million dollars and take a whole life-time to pay, and a care *that cost another quarter of a million, and
    *a healthcare system that is actually a highway-robbery system in white gowns

    how do we get the nation to be creative and innovative?

    No time, no energy left…..even to make babies !

    And to rub it in, we have $million goondus masquerading as ministers, spouting rubbish, trying to “lead” the nation in taking the nation forward.

    Even today, we have ministers who look like they are still sucking pacifiers at home, attempt to look good by mimicking the old leaders of 30 years ago, proposing things that are totally out of place, out of time. Like, still trying to “sell” China our “software” in managing cities and industrial parks.

    The PAP has to go….there is absolutely no chance of it ever changing. The groupthink, the corruptible largess of money umlimted…has reached an irreversible stage of rot.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • pap selected INDIAN president:

    you pap Ljs and pap CBs in parleement please listen.

    Singapore started to rot when pap started to pay each other S$m.

    1st, because everyone in pap is a millionaire, every thing becomes cheap. so much so every ffffing policy coming out of pap Lj and pap Cb mouths is affordable. ffff. if everyone is S$m year in year out, of course every ffffing thing pap can implement is cheap. BUT the truth is, median wage GROSS is less than S$3,500 pm. SO affordable is FAKE news.

    2nd, pap fakes about caring for the needy and poor in Singapore. when one has S$m coming in year in year out very quickly one becomes entitled to the luxuries of life. HOW, then, can such a Lj or Cb take care of the needy and poor? THE task is actually impossible since the needy and poor are so many and the S$m pap Lj and S$m Cb have so many zeroes to count in their own bank accounts. THE conflict here is the root cause of rot in current Singapore.

    3rd, for ffff sake, Singapore is a city nation. a small piece of island. natural selection over the years show the small island can accommodate naturally about 3m+. stretch to 4m at maximum. SO to say Singapore belongs to every one is utter FAKE news. AND very irresponsible too. WHO gives pap Ljs and pap Cbs the right to say 6.9m or 10.0m? the stupid 70% sheep? NO. there is justice under the sky. CANNOT abuse, humans or nature. OTHERWISE things break. THIS is why once great Singapore is starting to rot.

    Solutions are very simple. PAY pap Ljs and pap Cbs median wage. very quickly can see right results in right policies. STOP playing against nature. STOP the Singapore belongs to every one stupidity. send back all the 2.8m+ aliens FTS PRs. these parasites were born in another land for a reason. SO off they go back to their land of birth.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    INSIDE 200m is not within 200m. WTF.

    INDIAN is malay. WTF.

    Singapore belongs to everyone. WTF.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Rabble-rouser:

    Prof Tambyah, you can say what you want but I’m afraid that the PAP wouldn’t listen to what you’ve said! Frankly this PAP govt is so set in their ways that they’re oblivious to any sort of feedback. They’ll keep doing same things over & over again until S’pore faces imminent collapse & then they’ll probably bailed out leaving S’pore & the trapped inhabitants to pick up the pieces. And that is the truth!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • N.Jungne:

    The Gabramen will ask for Donation and Volunteers, see how good are our Gabras.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • patriot of Temesak:

    Heng Swee Kiat is NOT Robin or Santa but a Parasite who when STRUCK down by a Stroke had to depend on the Govt generosity and priviledges as a Parasite living off the peoples’ SUFFERINGS!!!

    The STROKE is a WARNING from ABOVE!!! Repent and Repay or “Pay the PRICE” for the people’s “Pay & PaY”

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • 阿不都.仁道班长.衣丝花篮:

    现執政党做的什么都是灾难?

    你相信这个说的比唱的好听的人能做得比现執政党好吗?

    新加坡人应该不会如此天真吧!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • fpc:

    I love Paul.

    Well said:

    In contrast, a young person who inherits a fortune from his parents and has not worked a day in his life but simply pays some bright fund managers to invest the money to generate returns, who lives on a yacht, shops in Milan, Tokyo and Shanghai, pays no estate duty, no capital gains tax, very little GST, while at the same time enjoying taxpayer funded infrastructure, amenities, security and resources. Very few countries outside of city states such as Monaco do such transfers to the wealthy the same way that we do.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • PAP elites entitlement mindset:

    The Other Hard Truths:
    Governments exist to take care of their citizens, but horrifically in Singapore, the ruling party deems the citizens exist only for taking care of its needs — which by the way, are humongously insatiable.

    The lives of the citizens of a country improve when you have leaders with a conviction and a mission to improve the lives of the lot stepping out. They will know how to get the priorities right, not those self-serving elitist scumbags with an entitlement mindset drawn in only by the multimillion-dollar salary (which the PAP tyranny permits them to arbitrarily decide to pay themselves).

    Such scum would have no interest whatsoever to serve the nation or the people if the salary were low, or even on par with leaders in other First World countries, let alone those of other emerging economies or Third World countries with a comparative purchasing power parity or standard of living in which their policies have made the majority of Singaporeans to actually live in.

    These PAP elites have openly admitted that they will succumb to corruption if they are not paid humongous salaries. How many leaders in other First World countries need humongous salaries to attract them to step out to serve the nation? How many of them have succumbed to corruption?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • how can it be excellent:

    Paul Tambyah:

    Singapore has excellent healthcare with some of the finest doctors, nurses and allied health professionals in the world especially in our public hospitals. We have access to the most up to date technologies and drugs and some really modern facilities with state of the art equipment.

    However, our healthcare financing system is overly complex leading to many people being afraid of falling sick in Singapore.

    So how can it be ‘excellent’ if we don’t have access to the healthcare we need because we can’t afford it when we fall ill, or forego the medical treatment because we feel the pain of the medical bill?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • how can it be excellent:

    It is excellent only if we have (or are able to have) access to it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • rich Civil Servants are spared:

    Paul Tambyah:
    I recently visited a friend at a long term care facility and saw row after row of disabled Singaporeans who had had strokes. Many of them were in their fifties and sixties and many of them had been told some time before their stroke that they had an irregular heart rate or high blood pressure but they had not followed up on this because of the costs of medications or the lack of an integrated subsidized primary healthcare system that catered to working Singaporeans.

    This shows that the Singapore healthcare system is not working.

    Nobody wants to be disabled, or to become seriously ill, or die. Why did they (have to) delay or procrastinate or forego the treatment they needed?

    A good healthcare system has to be humane, and be accessible to all. And Singapore has ample (huge) perennial annual budget surpluses to enable us to adopt a more humane and civilized approach.

    However, much of those (budget) surpluses were spent on something else, something else less pressing, often the pet projects of the decision makers, and in line with their (even private) self-interests.

    Or frittered away. Like the $500m unthinkingly spent on YOG which served nothing to us and now forgotten by everyone. Or the millions spent on the $2,200 Brompton bicycles for public gardeners; or the Herman Miller’s chairs for Civil Servant butts. Plus the many flashy monuments, etc. to showcase Singapore to the world.

    Or the hundreds of billions of our reserves lost by some foolish Civil Servants, easily outwitted by everyone else. And they didn’t feel the pain, and continued to gamble away more of our money.

    In PAP-run Singapore, the poor can suffer, and die. The multi-millionaire Civil Servant decision makers are spared.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • sorry,you'd hv to suffer n die:

    Paul Tambyah:

    I raised this at the IPS dialogue with DPM Teo Chee Hean last month and his response was to cite the classic neoliberal argument that if you provide free medical care, a “buffet table syndrome” will result.

    This means that individuals will get all kinds of diseases and treatments just so that they can enjoy the free medical benefits.

    How stupid can one get?

    If you offer me something I enjoy having for free, sure, I might pile it on in the buffet.

    Now, you mean I want to or will try to become sick because you offer free treatment? That was GCT’s (or was it LKY’s?) logic. Use your own head to think!

    Sure, many would probably take more care of their health if medical care is not free. But that does not mean you want to get sick because the treatment is free.

    The approach ought to be more education on health prevention to mitigate the cost of healthcare. Those who still succumb to it should be able to receive medical attention humanely, even if the treatment has to be made available for free.

    A civilized society cannot say ‘sorry, if you can’t afford it, you’d have to suffer and die’. Least, when we have huge budget surpluses every year, despite having wasted or spending much of it on other less pressing needs.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • policies that favor the rich:

    Paul Tambyah:

    Singapore’s taxation system is already extremely regressive. The highest taxes are paid by low wage work permit holders who contribute up to 40-50% of the money paid by their employers to various government levies.

    In Singapore, elderly Ah Pek’s and Ah Ma’s who have to pay GST on the medications that they buy from the Sinseh and on the water conservation tax that they pay in their homes.

    In contrast, a young person who inherits a fortune from his parents and has not worked a day in his life but simply pays some bright fund managers to invest the money to generate returns, who lives on a yacht, shops in Milan, Tokyo and Shanghai, pays no estate duty, no capital gains tax, very little GST, while at the same time enjoying taxpayer funded infrastructure, amenities, security and resources.

    Such is how the Singapore PAP tyranny is run, in their own self-interest.

    The extremely highly paid multimillionaire PAP Civil Servant elites make policies that always benefit them first, using one-sided arguments that always favors themselves, which also means the rich.

    No surprise when they reduced their million-dollar income tax bracket rates to the one of the lowest in the world.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • then give you a huge discount:

    //A good healthcare system has to be humane, and be accessible to all. And Singapore has ample (huge) perennial annual budget surpluses to enable us to adopt a more humane and civilized approach.//

    civilized approach is for the treatment of the white monkey idiots and gang and for civil servants.

    the rest of the daft sinkies will have to finance this civilized approach and take care of themselves also lar. have you seen any hospital bill for one month or two month stay – e.g usually you get to see very very high amount on the top part, then huge garment subsidy for the lower class (then medishield followed by medisave). it works like singapore great sales bs where the retailers will price high and then give you a huge discount.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • HarderTruths:

    Yes, by all means
    Let’s have a discussion about a possible plan that looks at a way to address how we can have a meaningful conversation about a possible problem

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement



Most Recent Comments
  • MarBowling: Thaman has said the Coverment has NO ROLE to play wrt who should squat as the CEO of TH. And yet SMOS...
  • Ah beng: Dr Chan you are dreaming. Clownish.
  • Haigen-diaz: Following the playbook of other strongmen of the past, Najib uses the same tactics PM Lee is using of a...
  • Ah Peng Kia: There will again be a global search, perhaps ending with the appointment of another General who can take...
  • it's because Sinkies are dumb: With so many top-scholar ‘top talents’ that the ‘best’...
  • Dr. Chan: Singaporeans voters should determine who should be the next PM and next government. He or she should be a...
  • Exercise in futility: Every day, Nasrudin crosses the border with a donkey loaded with a pair of panniers. After a...
  • HarderTruths: He is right of course. Pappies have made their money through HDB – so what of the price falls and...
  • HarderTruths: He will only give up the throne to his sons. So he is waiting for one of them to return and rule $G...
  • what to do: The trouble is no one in Sinkieland is keen to sign on. The pay is attractive but the job sucks....
  • A Nation Of Dumb Parrots: The key problem is not due to lack of choices of opposition members to take over PAP but...
  • You Die Your Own Business: The greedy devil PAP has nothing to lose. They can still sell your land at the high market...
  • High and mighty low-down: It takes quite a bit of wrongdoing to sink down into 151st place in the world’s Free...
  • Trust only myself: rukidding: Its been MONTHs NOW…..my elder brother ( age 65 ) has NOT EVEN a SINGLE VIEWER for his...
Announcement
Support TRE
Support TR Emeritus:
Other Amount:
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRE Classifieds
  • Sample of a Premium 4 Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Premium 4 Ad (can upl...
    [Read more]

  • Sample of a Free Ad

    . This ia a sample of how a Free Ad (without imag...
    [Read more]

  • Korean Stylenanda

    Stylenanda is a South Korea-based clothes brand. T...
    [Read more]

  • SmartCar

    Prevent $thousands In Vehicle Repairs. SmartCar Wi...
    [Read more]