With more people dying – is changing HDB policies good for Singaporeans?

I refer to Ku Swee Yong’s article “Prepare for supply avalanche as ageing HDB flat owners die” (Straits Times, Mar 5).

It states that “Even as a larger supply of resale flats comes on the market from a passing generation of baby boomers, demand will go down due to a shrinking youth population. The widening gap between supply and demand will add significant downward pressure on resale prices.

Compounding the issue is the ageing of HDB flats, which are sold on 99-year leases. The depreciation of old HDB flats steepens from the point of 40 years of age and by 2030, more than 400,000 HDB flats will be left with a remaining lease of 59 years or less. This is likely to lead to lower prices.”

As to “To lessen the impact, Singapore can attract more foreigners to become permanent residents and citizens to boost demand for resale HDB flats. But that is contingent on the economy creating tens of thousands of additional jobs every year and remaining attractive to foreign migrants” – the continuance of such a policy – about 30,000 New PRs and 20,000 new citizens granted per year, may continue to have negative implications for Singaporeans.

For example, very little of the jobs growth in the last three years may have gone to true-blue Singaporeans.

Also, resale flats’ prices may be less affordable.

With regard to “Alternatively, HDB can loosen “ownership” rules to allow beneficiaries to inherit HDB flats, even when they already own a flat. Subletting rules may then have to be relaxed so the flats will not remain vacant” – allowing Airbnb in Singapore may help to relieve not just this issue, but also help many cash-strapped Singaporeans.

In respect of “I would strongly recommend a third option. In death-related and inheritance cases, the HDB could repossess the flats at the prevailing resale value, allowing the beneficiaries to divide the cash proceeds.

This gives the HDB a larger stock of rental flats so that the public has more housing choices. The HDB could also refurbish the newer flats acquired and offer them for resale under the Sale of Balance Flats scheme – at prices that take into account the remaining years of lease” – whilst this is a good suggestion – it may have negative implications for Singaporeans, as long as the “profit-making” public housing policies remain.

For example, one needs only to look at the financials of schemes like the Lease-buyback scheme to see how much money and equity HDB flat owners are losing?


Leong Sze Hian




Sponsored Content

4 Responses to “With more people dying – is changing HDB policies good for Singaporeans?”

  • HarderTruths:

    Rest assured pappies WILL find a way to make money from people who are dying.
    Death tax?

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Sad:

    Sad to see many who has put most of their money in the HDB flat will end up with nothing at the end of the HDB lease…
    The only right thing to do is to return 50% of the purchase value back to them as the Land goes back to the Government.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Amos exposed PAP hypocrisy:

    Another big mistake (besides making GDP growth main economic KPI) made by PAP. It made Singaporeans “feel rich” through a property bubble on rented (not-owned) housing. LHL also used public housing to “drain” the CPF accounts of Singaporeans by selling them over-priced flats. And when Singaporeans do not have enough money in their CPF to live on PAP raises GST to fund financial support to elderly Singaporeans. PAP just makes one big mistake after another. It is really a “spent force”. Time to bury it with the arrogant, self-serving SOB LKY. “Clear the swamp”. VTO.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • kenny:

    They would not do it until the problem blows up right in their face.
    Never good at creative solutions, forecasts and good foresight.
    Only good at reactive and fire fighting issues and problems ! ! !
    I just hope the next election the 70% majority win will drop to 60 % ! ! !

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system

Leave a Reply

 characters available

Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Most Recent Comments
  • Tom lee: Well the Dis*&# Son wants to show fist to US by going ahead with TPP. What nonsense TPP without US and...
  • MarBowling: Think D Trump hasn’t forget what Mai Hum has passed negative remarks about him bf he was elected as the...
  • patriot of Temesak: The DIFFERENCE??? one is a MAN who walks like a Dragon…the other is a SHIM neither she or...
  • Lye Khuen Way: Hear, Hear! Agree with Mr Tan that what our PM had announced so far are just outdated model. We would...
  • patriot of Temesak: PM Lee is trying to IDENTIFY himself with the Billionaires after all he belongs to a Dynasty that...
  • patriot of Temesak: Father & Son are BEHOLDEN to the SWAMP headed by Kissinger…Killer of UNBORN BABIES and...
  • HarderTruths: The USA is a warmonger and only looks after itself. $G is a tool nothing more. $G has stupidos like LHL...
  • Kiuk, Great Woman: Wow. She’s impressive. Like Ong TC, dare to ask how much is in the reserve. For OTC, the...
  • Char Chong Fake: opposition dude: And PAP wants to set up a wayang committee to look into fake news? Ironic is...
  • Eviil be gone: Ad hominem is an attack directly at a person’s character . It’s a method equivalent to...
  • Eviil be gone: He did not die from liver? So lucky rich man. Is liver disease a rich man good life disease due to...
  • What is there sto defend?: The assumption is that NS men have good reasons to defend the country. But what is there...
  • 'Fake' Chairman?: For A Parliamentary Committee on Fake News? Got Moral Standing or not? Be a Gentleman and stand up...
Support TR Emeritus
Support TR Emeritus:
Other Amount:
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic